/* DATA DESCRIPTION: Citation: Hays, James D; Cook, Harry E III (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 9-81. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.231178 Related to: DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM Orr, W N; Milow, E Dean; Goll, Robert M; Fuller, J T; Cook, F M; Jenkins, D Graham; Cook, Harry E III; Hays, J D (1972): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, IX, 1205 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.9.1972 Further details: Processed smear slide data base - background and methods (URI: hdl:10013/epic.32353.d001) Project(s): Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) (URI: http://www.deepseadrilling.org/) Coverage: LATITUDE: 1.441500 * LONGITUDE: -113.809000 DATE/TIME START: 1970-01-08T00:00:00 * DATE/TIME END: 1970-01-08T00:00:00 MINIMUM DEPTH, sediment/rock: 1.30 m * MAXIMUM DEPTH, sediment/rock: 389.85 m Event(s): 9-81 * LATITUDE: 1.441500 * LONGITUDE: -113.809000 * DATE/TIME: 1970-01-08T00:00:00 * ELEVATION: -3865.0 m * Penetration: 409.3 m * Recovery: 38.4 m * LOCATION: North Pacific/HILL * CAMPAIGN: Leg9 (URI: https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.9.1972) * BASIS: Glomar Challenger (URI: http://www-odp.tamu.edu/glomar.html) * METHOD/DEVICE: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * COMMENT: 7 cores; 39.7 m cored; 0 m drilled; 96.7 % recovery Parameter(s): DEPTH, sediment/rock [m] (Depth sed) * GEOCODE Sample code/label (Sample label) * METHOD/DEVICE: DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation (URI: hdl:10013/epic.27914.d001) Sand [%] (Sand) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Silt [%] (Silt) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay [%] (<2 µm) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Stratigraphy (Stratigraphy) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Lithology/composition/facies (Lithology) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Comment (Comment) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Nannofossils [%] (Nannos) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Foraminifera [%] (Foram) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Radiolarians [%] (Rad) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Collophane [%] (Collophane) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Mica [%] (Mica) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Clay minerals [%] (Clay min) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Glauconite [%] (Glt) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Manganese [%] (Mn) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0) (URI: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) Size: 135 data points */ Depth sed [m] Sample label Sand [%] Silt [%] <2 µm [%] Stratigraphy Lithology Comment Nannos [%] Foram [%] Rad [%] Collophane [%] Mica [%] Clay min [%] Glt [%] Mn [%] 1.30 9-81-1-11,105 35 35 35 Pleistocene FORAM NANNO RAD OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 40 25 0 0 6 1 0 0 1.60 9-81-1-11,135 35 35 35 Pleistocene FORAM RAD NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 70 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 1.70 9-81-1-11,145 35 35 35 Pleistocene FORAM RAD NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 70 10 20 0 0 0 0 0 2.50 9-81-1-2,75 35 35 35 Pleistocene FORAM RAD NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 45 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 321.93 9-81-2-2,73 35 35 35 Middle miocene RAD NANNO CHALK Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 60 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 327.30 9-81-2-CC,0 0 0 0 Middle miocene CLAY Minor lithology; relative abundance 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 377.90 9-81-3-2,10 0 0 0 Middle miocene RAD FORAM NANNO CHALK Dominat lithology; relative abundance 65 20 0 2 0 0 0 0 378.08 9-81-3-2,28 35 35 35 Middle miocene FORAM NANNO DIATOM RAD CHALK Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 389.85 9-81-4-1,75 10 10 85 Lower miocene FORAM RAD NANNO CHALK Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 85 5 5 0 0 0 0 0