Citation:

PANGAEA.231178

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Orr, W N; Milow, E Dean; Goll, Robert M; Fuller, J T; Cook, F M; Jenkins, D Graham; Cook, Harry E III; Hays, J D (1972): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, IX, 1205 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.9.1972

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 1.441500 * Longitude: -113.809000

Date/Time Start: 1970-01-08T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1970-01-08T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 1.30 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 389.85 m

Event(s):

9-81 * Latitude: 1.441500 * Longitude: -113.809000 * Date/Time: 1970-01-08T00:00:00 * Elevation: -3865.0 m * Penetration: 409.3 m * Recovery: 38.4 m * Location: North Pacific/HILL * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 7 cores; 39.7 m cored; 0 m drilled; 96.7 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Collophane	Collophane	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Mica	Mica	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Glauconite	Glt	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Manganese	Mn	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

135 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Nannos [%]	10 Foram [%]	11 Rad [%]	12 Collophane [%]	13 Mica [%]	14 Clay min [%]	15 Glt [%]	16 Mn [%]
1.30	9-81-1-11,105	35	35	35	Pleistocene	FORAM NANNO RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	40	25	0	0	6	1	0	0
1.60	9-81-1-11,135	35	35	35	Pleistocene	FORAM RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	70	15	15	0	0	0	0	0
1.70	9-81-1-11,145	35	35	35	Pleistocene	FORAM RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	70	10	20	0	0	0	0	0
2.50	9-81-1-2,75	35	35	35	Pleistocene	FORAM RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	45	15	0	0	0	0	0	0
321.93	9-81-2-2,73	35	35	35	Middle miocene	RAD NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	60	5	0	0	0	0	0	1
327.30	9-81-2-CC,0	0	0	0	Middle miocene	CLAY	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0
377.90	9-81-3-2,10	0	0	0	Middle miocene	RAD FORAM NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	65	20	0	2	0	0	0	0
378.08	9-81-3-2,28	35	35	35	Middle miocene	FORAM NANNO DIATOM RAD CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	20	20	0	0	0	0	0	0
389.85	9-81-4-1,75	10	10	85	Lower miocene	FORAM RAD NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	85	5	5	0	0	0	0	0