Citation:

PANGAEA.231177

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Orr, W N; Milow, E Dean; Goll, Robert M; Fuller, J T; Cook, F M; Jenkins, D Graham; Cook, Harry E III; Hays, J D (1972): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, IX, 1205 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.9.1972

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: -0.962000 * Longitude: -121.553700

Date/Time Start: 1970-01-04T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1970-01-04T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 42.85 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 147.27 m

Event(s):

9-80A * Latitude: -0.962000 * Longitude: -121.553700 * Date/Time: 1970-01-04T00:00:00 * Elevation: -4411.0 m * Penetration: 155.7 m * Recovery: 45.5 m * Location: South Pacific/VALLEY * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 5 cores; 45.5 m cored; 0 m drilled; 99.9 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Quartz	Qz	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Feldspar	Fsp	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

135 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Nannos [%]	10 Foram [%]	11 Rad [%]	12 Diatoms [%]	13 Qz [%]	14 Fsp [%]	15 Clay min [%]	16 Volc glass [%]
42.85	9-80A-2-1,10	60	60	60	Lower pliocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	60	0	25	5	0	0	0	0
43.79	9-80A-2-11,104	60	60	60	Lower pliocene	FORAM NANNO RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	45	10	35	0	0	0	0	0
45.68	9-80A-2-21,143	60	60	60	Lower pliocene	FORAM RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	50	15	30	0	0	0	1	0
86.91	9-80A-3-1,7	60	60	35	Middle miocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	95	5	6	6	0	0
90.82	9-80A-3-3,98	60	60	60	Middle miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	80	0	10	0	0	0	2	1
109.60	9-80A-4-1,20	60	60	60	Lower miocene	NANNO FORAM CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	23	23	3	0	0	0	51	0
111.35	9-80A-4-2,45	60	60	60	Lower miocene	FORAM NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	50	40	5	0	0	0	0	0
147.21	9-80A-5-1,44	0	0	0	Lower miocene	RAD FORAM NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	50	35	15	0	0	0	0	0
147.27	9-80A-5-1,50	60	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD FORAM NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	70	20	10	0	0	0	0	0