Citation:

PANGAEA.231176

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Orr, W N; Milow, E Dean; Goll, Robert M; Fuller, J T; Cook, F M; Jenkins, D Graham; Cook, Harry E III; Hays, J D (1972): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, IX, 1205 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.9.1972

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: -0.962000 * Longitude: -121.553700

Date/Time Start: 1970-01-04T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1970-01-04T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.40 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 196.22 m

Event(s):

9-80 * Latitude: -0.962000 * Longitude: -121.553700 * Date/Time: 1970-01-04T00:00:00 * Elevation: -4411.0 m * Penetration: 199.7 m * Recovery: 39.5 m * Location: South Pacific/VALLEY * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 6 cores; 44 m cored; 0 m drilled; 89.9 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Chalcedony	Chalcedony	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Quartz	Qz	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Mica	Mica	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

255 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Nannos [%]	10 Foram [%]	11 Chalcedony [%]	12 Rad [%]	13 Diatoms [%]	14 Qz [%]	15 Mica [%]	16 Clay min [%]	17 Volc glass [%]
0.40	9-80-1-1,27	60	60	60	Pleistocene	FORAM NANNO RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	35	20	0	45	0	0	0	0	0
0.53	9-80-1-1,40	60	60	60	Pleistocene	FORAM RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	50	15	0	35	0	0	0	0	0
0.83	9-80-1-1,70	60	60	60	Pleistocene	FORAM RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	60	20	0	20	0	0	0	0	0
5.14	9-80-1-4,51	60	35	60	Pleistocene	RAD FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	55	38	0	15	0	0	0	0	0
9.23	9-80-1-CC,0	60	60	60		FORAM RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	60	20	0	20	0	0	0	0	0
61.36	9-80-2-1,15	35	60	60	Upper miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	60	10	0	30	2	0	0	0	0
61.74	9-80-2-1,53	35	60	60	Upper miocene	NANNO RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	50	10	0	40	0	0	0	0	0
128.15	9-80-3-1,38	60	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD FORAM NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	65	25	0	10	0	0	0	0	0
130.37	9-80-3-21,110	60	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD FORAM NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	33	33	0	33	0	0	0	1	1
136.02	9-80-3-6,75	0	0	0	Lower miocene	VOLCANIC PUMICE FRAGS	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	0	60	0	0	0
167.95	9-80-4-2,75	35	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	80	10	0	10	0	0	0	0	0
169.48	9-80-4-3,78	35	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	80	10	0	10	0	0	0	1	6
171.08	9-80-4-4,88	35	60	60	Lower miocene	NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	85	7	0	7	0	0	6	1	0
194.05	9-80-5-2,15	0	35	85	Lower miocene	NANNO CLAY CHALK MUDSTONE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	45	5	0	0	0	0	0	45	0
194.68	9-80-5-2,78	0	10	85	Lower miocene	CLAY NANNO CHALK MUDSTONE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	50	5	0	5	0	0	0	40	0
196.22	9-80-5-3,82	0	35	85	Lower miocene	CLAY NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	70	5	5	0	0	0	0	20	0