Citation:

PANGAEA.231174

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Orr, W N; Milow, E Dean; Goll, Robert M; Fuller, J T; Cook, F M; Jenkins, D Graham; Cook, Harry E III; Hays, J D (1972): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, IX, 1205 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.9.1972

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 2.550300 * Longitude: -121.566700

Date/Time Start: 1969-12-31T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1969-12-31T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 3.00 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 390.00 m

Event(s):

9-79 * Latitude: 2.550300 * Longitude: -121.566700 * Date/Time: 1969-12-31T00:00:00 * Elevation: -4574.0 m * Penetration: 413.9 m * Recovery: 109.1 m * Location: North Pacific/VALLEY * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 16 cores; 123.7 m cored; 0 m drilled; 88.2 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Feldspar	Fsp	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Mica	Mica	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Manganese	Mn	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

420 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Nannos [%]	10 Foram [%]	11 Rad [%]	12 Fsp [%]	13 Mica [%]	14 Clay min [%]	15 Volc glass [%]	16 Mn [%]
3.00	9-79-1-21,110	60	35	60	Pleistocene	FORAM RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	60	17	0	0	0	0	0	0
3.07	9-79-1-21,117	60	60	60	Pleistocene	CLAY FORAM RAD NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	55	17	0	0	0	10	0	0
3.13	9-79-1-21,123	85	60	35	Pleistocene	NANNO CLAY FORAM RAD CHALK OOZE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	20	25	0	0	0	25	0	0
6.50	9-79-1-5,10	35	35	35	Pleistocene	FORAM NANNO RAD CLAY MUD	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	15	15	15	0	0	55	0	0
6.52	9-79-1-5,12	35	35	35	Pleistocene	FORAM RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	70	15	15	0	0	0	0	0
9.50	9-79-1-CC,0	60	60	60	Pleistocene	FORAM NANNO RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	34	10	43	0	0	13	0	0
61.02	9-79-2-1,60	35	35	35	Lower pliocene	FORAM NANNO RAD MANGANESE OOZE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	27	10	0	0	0	0	0	35
61.72	9-79-2-11,130	35	35	35	Lower pliocene	FORAM RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	55	12	0	0	0	0	0	0
61.82	9-79-2-11,140	35	35	35	Lower pliocene	FORAM NANNO RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	35	10	0	0	0	0	0	0
67.12	9-79-2-5,70	60	60	35	Upper miocene	FORAM NANNO RAD DIAT OOZE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	25	10	0	0	0	0	0	0
67.19	9-79-2-5,77	35	35	35	Upper miocene	FORAM NANNO RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	45	10	0	0	0	0	0	0
67.72	9-79-2-51,130	60	60	35	Upper miocene	FORAM NANNO RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	25	10	65	0	0	0	0	0
127.35	9-79-3-1,25	60	60	60	Upper miocene	NANNO RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	35	10	0	0	0	0	0	0
133.35	9-79-3-5,25	60	60	60	Upper miocene	FORAM NANNO RAD OOZE CHALK	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	45	12	0	0	0	0	0	0
133.40	9-79-3-5,30	60	60	60	Upper miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	55	10	0	0	0	0	0	0
135.35	9-79-3-6,75	60	60	60	Upper miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE,CHALK OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	55	10	0	0	0	0	0	0
195.88	9-79-4-2,58	35	35	60	Middle miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	55	10	0	0	0	0	0	0
195.92	9-79-4-2,62	60	60	60	Middle miocene	NANNO RAD CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	35	10	0	0	0	0	0	0
264.35	9-79-5-3,75	10	10	85	Middle miocene	FORAM RAD NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	75	12	12	0	0	0	0	0
328.14	9-79-6-11,144	0	0	0	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	10	35	2	0	0	0	0
333.45	9-79-6-5,75	60	60	60	Lower miocene	FORAM RAD NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	55	10	0	0	0	0	0	0
334.10	9-79-6-51,140	35	35	85	Lower miocene	RAD FORAM NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	70	17	12	0	0	0	2	0
345.10	9-79-8-1,10	35	35	60	Lower miocene	CLAY RAD NANNO CHALK	Minor lithology; relative abundance	72	7	17	0	6	4	0	0
353.35	9-79-9-1,75	35	35	60	Lower miocene	FORAM NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	72	17	10	0	0	0	0	0
360.95	9-79-10-4,75	0	0	0	Lower miocene	FORAM NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	85	10	5	0	0	0	0	0
372.30	9-79-11-6,60	0	0	0	Lower miocene	FORAM NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	75	20	5	0	0	0	0	0
382.65	9-79-13-2,75	35	10	85	Lower miocene	FORAM NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	85	10	5	0	0	0	0	0
390.00	9-79-14-1,50	10	10	85	Lower miocene	RAD FORAM NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	85	7	7	0	0	0	0	0