Citation:

PANGAEA.231173

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Orr, W N; Milow, E Dean; Goll, Robert M; Fuller, J T; Cook, F M; Jenkins, D Graham; Cook, Harry E III; Hays, J D (1972): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, IX, 1205 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.9.1972

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods. hdl:10013/epic.32353.d001

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 7.950000 * Longitude: -127.355800

Date/Time Start: 1969-12-25T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1969-12-25T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.27 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 320.09 m

Event(s):

9-78 * Latitude: 7.950000 * Longitude: -127.355800 * Date/Time: 1969-12-25T00:00:00 * Elevation: -4378.0 m * Penetration: 320.4 m * Recovery: 301.3 m * Location: North Pacific/CONT RISE * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 37 cores; 320.4 m cored; 0 m drilled; 94 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Mica	Mica	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Magnetite	Fe3O4	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Manganese	Mn	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

660 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Nannos [%]	10 Foram [%]	11 Rad [%]	12 Diatoms [%]	13 Mica [%]	14 Clay min [%]	15 Fe3O4 [%]	16 Mn [%]
0.27	9-78-1-1,0	0	0	85	Middle miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	90	5	5	0	0	3	0	0
2.12	9-78-1-2,35	10	10	85	Middle miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	90	5	5	0	6	2	0	0
2.12	9-78-1-2,35	10	10	85	Middle miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	90	5	5	0	0	4	0	0
5.87	9-78-1-41,110	0	0	0	Middle miocene	FORAM-RAD-NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	85	8	8	0	6	1	0	0
14.52	9-78-2-4,80	35	10	85	Middle miocene	FORAM-RAD-NANNO CHALK OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	83	10	13	0	6	5	0	0
17.42	9-78-2-6,70	10	10	85	Middle miocene	CLAY NANNO OOZE TO CHALK OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	90	5	5	0	0	0	0	0
20.50	9-78-3-2,50	35	35	60	Middle miocene	RAD FORAM NANNO CHALK OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	70	18	13	0	6	2	0	0
21.40	9-78-3-21,140	35	35	35	Middle miocene	CLAY NANNO RAD CHALK OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	40	5	40	0	0	15	0	0
29.55	9-78-4-2,35	35	0	85	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	65	10	25	0	0	4	0	0
29.95	9-78-4-2,75	60	60	60	Lower miocene	NANNO-RAD CHALK OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	35	8	55	0	0	2	0	0
30.25	9-78-4-21,105	0	0	0	Lower miocene	CLAY NANNO RAD CHALK OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	35	5	45	0	23	18	0	0
48.05	9-78-6-2,55	35	35	60	Lower miocene	CLAY RAD-NANNO CHALK OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	88	5	13	0	6	3	0	0
57.45	9-78-7-2,75	60	35	60	Lower miocene	VERY PALE ORANGE RAD-NANNO-FORAM OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	40	45	15	0	0	0	0	0
57.95	9-78-7-21,125	35	35	60	Lower miocene	RAD FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	55	35	13	0	0	0	0	0
60.45	9-78-7-4,75	35	35	35	Lower miocene	RAD FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	50	35	15	0	0	0	0	0
64.15	9-78-7-61,145	35	35	60	Lower miocene	RAD-NANNO CHALK OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	70	10	23	0	6	2	0	0
86.31	9-78-10-3,75	0	0	0	Lower miocene	RAD-FORAM-NANNO-CHALK OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	55	35	10	0	0	0	0	0
103.70	9-78-12-3,10	35	35	60	Lower miocene	FORAM NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	80	18	5	0	0	0	0	0
108.85	9-78-12-6,75	35	0	60	Lower miocene	FORAM NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	85	13	5	0	0	0	0	0
112.20	9-78-13-2,70	35	35	60	Lower miocene	RAD-FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	75	13	13	0	0	0	0	0
112.25	9-78-13-2,75	0	0	0	Lower miocene	FORAM-NANNO-RAD CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	40	20	20	20	0	0	0	10
118.25	9-78-13-6,75	35	0	60	Lower miocene	FORAM RAD NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	80	10	0	0	0	0	0	0
142.20	9-78-16-4,30	35	35	60	Upper oligocene	FORAM-RAD-NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	75	8	15	0	0	0	0	0
142.77	9-78-16-4,87	35	35	60	Upper oligocene	FORAM-RAD-NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	65	13	18	0	0	0	0	0
143.15	9-78-16-41,125	35	35	60	Upper oligocene	CLAY RAD-FORAM-NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	68	20	18	0	0	3	0	0
151.30	9-78-17-4,50	35	35	60	Upper oligocene	FORAM-RAD-NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	85	8	8	0	0	0	0	0
159.20	9-78-18-3,50	35	35	85	Upper oligocene	FORAM RAD NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	75	13	0	0	0	0	0	0
168.14	9-78-19-3,25	35	35	60	Upper oligocene	FORAM-RAD-NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	70	15	15	0	0	0	0	0
169.14	9-78-19-31,125	35	35	60	Upper oligocene	FORAM-RAD-NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	70	15	15	0	0	0	0	0
178.70	9-78-20-4,50	35	35	60	Upper oligocene	FORAM RAD NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	75	13	13	0	0	0	0	0
185.37	9-78-21-2,75	35	35	60	Upper oligocene	FORAM-RAD-NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	80	10	10	0	0	0	0	0
191.37	9-78-21-6,75	0	0	0	Upper oligocene	FORAM-RAD-NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	75	13	13	0	0	0	0	0
200.45	9-78-22-6,75	35	35	60	Upper oligocene	FORAM-RAD-NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	75	13	13	0	0	0	0	0
227.65	9-78-25-6,75	35	35	60	Upper oligocene	FORAM-NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	75	20	5	0	0	0	0	0
242.95	9-78-27-4,75	35	35	60	Upper oligocene	FORAM NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	80	20	5	0	0	0	0	0
256.10	9-78-28-61,140	35	0	85	Upper oligocene	RAD-FORAM-NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	75	15	10	0	0	0	0	0
262.75	9-78-29-5,75	35	0	60	Upper oligocene	FORAM NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	70	25	5	0	0	0	0	0
271.60	9-78-30-5,20	35	0	60	Upper oligocene	FORAM-NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	83	13	5	0	0	0	0	0
274.15	9-78-30-61,125	0	0	0	Upper oligocene	FORAM NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	75	25	5	0	0	0	0	0
290.55	9-78-32-5,75	35	0	60	Upper oligocene	FORAM NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	83	18	5	0	0	0	0	0
299.65	9-78-33-5,75	60	35	60	Upper oligocene	FORAM NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	65	35	5	0	0	0	0	0
308.70	9-78-34-5,75	60	35	60	Upper oligocene	NANNO FORAM CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	45	55	5	0	0	0	0	0
319.27	9-78-35-6,75	10	10	35	Upper oligocene	CLAY RAD NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	83	0	18	0	0	1	0	0
320.09	9-78-36-1,5	85	0	35	Lower oligocene	FORAM PACKSTONE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	68	0	0	0	2	1	0