Citation:

PANGAEA.231165

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Whitman, Jill M; Sliter, William V; Schaefer, Rainer G; Schaaf, André; Premoli Silva, Isabella; Ogg, James G; Haggerty, Janet A; Fujii, Naoyuki; Floyd, Peter A; Dean, Walter E; Bergen, James A; Baltuck, Miriam; Moberly, Ralph; Schlanger, Seymour O (1986): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, LXXXIX, 678 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.89.1986

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: -0.497300 * Longitude: 158.498200

Date/Time Start: 1982-11-19T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1982-11-19T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 41.60 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 296.40 m

Event(s):

89-586A * Latitude: -0.497300 * Longitude: 158.498200 * Date/Time: 1982-11-19T00:00:00 * Elevation: -2207.0 m * Penetration: 300.2 m * Recovery: 256.8 m * Location: South Pacific * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 31 cores; 260.9 m cored; 0 m drilled; 98.4 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
7	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
8	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
9	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Silicoflagellates	Silicoflag	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Zeolite	Zeo	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Mica	Mica	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Pyrite, FeS2	Py	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Iron	Fe	%	Smear slide analysis
20	Ilmenite	Ilm	%	Smear slide analysis
21	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis
22	Organic matter	OM	%	Smear slide analysis	organic debris

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

987 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Lithology	7 Comment	8 Carb [%]	9 Nannos [%]	10 Foram [%]	11 Rad [%]	12 Diatoms [%]	13 Silicoflag [%]	14 Spiculae [%]	15 Zeo [%]	16 Mica [%]	17 Clay min [%]	18 Py [%]	19 Fe [%]	20 Ilm [%]	21 Volc glass [%]	22 OM [%]
41.60	89-586A-1-2,80	8	12	80	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	86	10	2	1	1	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
43.13	89-586A-1-3,83	12	3	85	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	82	15	1	1	1	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
43.18	89-586A-1-3,88	3	10	87	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	89	10	2	2	0	0	0	2	0	1	0	0	0	0
49.64	89-586A-2-1,74	18	2	80	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	1	78	20	2	2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0
50.90	89-586A-2-2,50	13	5	78	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	1	83	15	1	2	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0
52.60	89-586A-2-3,70	5	3	92	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	1	85	10	1	1	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
60.70	89-586A-3-2,70	12	5	83	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	3	81	12	3	2	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
61.96	89-586A-3-3,46	8	5	87	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	5	83	11	1	0	0	2	0	0	0	2	0	2	0	2
63.87	89-586A-3-4,87	12	5	83	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	1	86	12	1	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0
70.11	89-586A-4-2,51	12	4	84	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	1	87	11	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
70.30	89-586A-4-2,70	9	3	88	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	3	85	10	1	2	0	0	0	0	0	1	2	0	2	2
82.79	89-586A-5-4,59	10	3	87	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	3	84	11	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0	0	0
90.92	89-586A-6-3,62	8	9	83	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	5	84	10	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
91.84	89-586A-6-4,4	11	9	80	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	4	82	14	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
101.50	89-586A-7-4,10	14	5	81	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	4	78	16	2	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
102.45	89-586A-7-41,105	8	7	85	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	2	86	10	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
110.52	89-586A-8-31,102	17	3	80	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	77	20	1	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
118.15	89-586A-9-2,55	5	15	80	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	75	23	2	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
129.44	89-586A-10-3,74	14	4	82	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	3	77	18	2	2	0	2	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0
138.40	89-586A-11-3,10	15	4	81	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	2	77	19	2	2	0	2	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0
142.42	89-586A-11-51,112	12	7	81	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	79	17	2	0	0	2	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0
150.05	89-586A-12-4,65	2	8	90	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	90	10	2	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0
157.95	89-586A-13-3,45	3	10	87	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	85	12	1	0	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
163.87	89-586A-14-2,57	1	9	90	M ZEOL TR	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	90	10	2	0	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
170.30	89-586A-15-3,60	2	10	88	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	88	12	2	0	0	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
178.05	89-586A-16-2,85	2	10	88	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	86	12	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0
193.50	89-586A-17-6,70	2	10	88	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	3	87	10	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0
197.00	89-586A-18-2,60	8	12	80	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	5	79	15	1	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
208.00	89-586A-19-3,50	8	10	82	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	2	87	10	1	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
215.30	89-586A-20-2,80	3	12	85	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	3	83	12	1	0	2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0
228.20	89-586A-21-41,110	2	10	88	M ZEOL TR	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	88	12	2	0	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
237.30	89-586A-22-4,60	2	12	86	FORAM BEARING NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	86	14	2	0	2	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
245.00	89-586A-23-3,20	2	14	84	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	84	15	1	0	2	2	0	0	0	2	0	0	2	0
248.60	89-586A-23-5,80	2	14	84	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	84	16	2	0	0	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
257.35	89-586A-24-41,145	4	12	84	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	1	58	10	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	30	0	0	0	0
260.35	89-586A-24-61,145	1	12	87	M ZEOL TR,CARB 1	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	86	13	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
269.87	89-586A-25-61,137	1	10	89	FORAM BEARING NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	1	88	10	1	2	2	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
274.35	89-586A-26-3,75	1	10	89	FORAM BEARING NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	10	79	11	2	2	2	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
277.43	89-586A-27-1,83	8	5	87	M PYR TR,CARB 5	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	80	12	3	2	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
278.44	89-586A-27-2,34	5	3	92	NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	7	66	10	4	1	1	7	0	0	6	0	0	0	0	0
279.18	89-586A-27-21,108	10	2	88	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	7	74	13	4	0	0	2	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0
280.34	89-586A-27-3,74	13	5	82	FORAM BEARING NANNO CHALK	Minor lithology; relative abundance	10	72	15	2	2	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0
280.71	89-586A-27-CC,8	10	3	87	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	9	67	15	5	1	0	0	0	0	3	0	0	0	2	0
285.75	89-586A-28-4,45	10	3	87	M CARB 3	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	85	10	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
289.20	89-586A-29-31,100	15	4	81	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	4	78	12	6	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0	0	0
290.75	89-586A-30-1,55	13	4	83	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	83	12	3	2	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
296.40	89-586A-31-11,120	15	4	81	FORAM BEARING NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	77	15	6	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0