Citation:

PANGAEA.231164

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Whitman, Jill M; Sliter, William V; Schaefer, Rainer G; Schaaf, André; Premoli Silva, Isabella; Ogg, James G; Haggerty, Janet A; Fujii, Naoyuki; Floyd, Peter A; Dean, Walter E; Bergen, James A; Baltuck, Miriam; Moberly, Ralph; Schlanger, Seymour O (1986): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, LXXXIX, 678 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.89.1986

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: -0.497300 * Longitude: 158.498200

Date/Time Start: 1982-11-19T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1982-11-19T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.06 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 37.83 m

Event(s):

89-586 * Latitude: -0.497300 * Longitude: 158.498200 * Date/Time: 1982-11-19T00:00:00 * Elevation: -2207.0 m * Penetration: 39.3 m * Recovery: 39 m * Location: South Pacific * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 5 cores; 39.3 m cored; 0 m drilled; 99.2 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
7	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
8	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
9	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Pteropoda	Pteropoda	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Silicoflagellates	Silicoflag	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Zeolite	Zeo	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Pyrite, FeS2	Py	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

306 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Lithology	7 Comment	8 Carb [%]	9 Nannos [%]	10 Foram [%]	11 Pteropoda [%]	12 Rad [%]	13 Diatoms [%]	14 Silicoflag [%]	15 Spiculae [%]	16 Zeo [%]	17 Py [%]	18 Volc glass [%]
0.06	89-586-1-1,6	35	30	35	NANNOFOSSIL FORAM OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	35	65	0	0	0	0	2	0	0	0
0.50	89-586-1-1,50	10	40	50	FORAMINIFERAL NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	50	50	0	2	0	2	2	2	0	0
0.75	89-586-1-1,75	30	30	40	NANNOFOSSIL FORAM OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	40	60	0	2	0	0	2	0	0	2
1.25	89-586-1-CC,23	10	40	50	FORAMINIFERAL NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	50	50	0	2	0	2	2	0	0	0
1.74	89-586-2-1,44	15	40	45	NANNOFOSSIL FORAM OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	45	55	0	0	0	0	2	2	0	2
2.60	89-586-2-11,130	2	30	68	FORAM NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	15	69	15	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	1
3.48	89-586-2-2,68	7	45	48	NANNOFOSSIL FORAM OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	46	50	0	2	0	2	2	0	0	2
8.70	89-586-2-51,140	2	28	70	FORAM NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	3	70	27	0	0	0	0	2	0	0	2
11.50	89-586-3-1,70	5	35	60	FORAM NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	60	35	0	2	0	0	2	0	0	1
12.81	89-586-3-2,51	15	35	50	FORAM NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	10	50	40	0	2	0	0	2	0	0	2
14.71	89-586-3-3,91	10	25	65	FORAM NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	5	65	28	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1
18.87	89-586-3-6,57	2	15	83	PYRITE BEARING NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	83	5	0	2	0	0	2	0	12	0
21.13	89-586-4-1,83	1	15	84	FORAM BEARING NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	84	16	2	0	2	2	2	0	0	0
22.38	89-586-4-2,58	15	35	50	FORAMINIFERAL NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	50	50	0	0	0	0	2	2	0	0
25.96	89-586-4-41,116	2	13	85	FORAM BEARING NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	85	15	0	2	0	0	2	0	0	0
28.12	89-586-4-6,32	3	25	72	FORAMINIFERAL NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	72	28	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0
35.20	89-586-5-4,90	2	18	80	FORAM BEARING NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	80	20	2	2	0	0	0	2	0	0
37.83	89-586-5-6,53	1	18	81	FORAM BEARING NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	81	17	0	2	0	0	2	2	2	0