Heath, G Ross; Burckle, Lloyd H (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 86-579 [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.231140
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Related to:
DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM
Wright, Audrey; Schultheiss, P; Morley, Joseph J; Lenôtre, Nicole; Monechi, Simonetta; Krissek, Lawrence A; Koizumi, Itaru; Janecek, Thomas R; Jacobi, Robert D; Horai, Ki-Iti; Bleil, Ulrich; D'Agostino, Anthony E; Heath, G Ross; Burckle, Lloyd H (1985): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, LXXXVI, 804 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.86.1985
Further details:
Project(s):
Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)
Coverage:
Latitude: 38.628000 * Longitude: 153.836200
Date/Time Start: 1982-06-01T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1982-06-01T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.35 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 15.00 m
Event(s):
86-579 * Latitude: 38.628000 * Longitude: 153.836200 * Date/Time: 1982-06-01T00:00:00 * Elevation: -5737.0 m * Penetration: 18.9 m * Recovery: 17.1 m * Location: North Pacific * Campaign: Leg86 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 2 cores; 17.9 m cored; 0 m drilled; 95.3 % recovery
Parameter(s):
| # | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DEPTH, sediment/rock | Depth sed | m | Geocode | ||
| 2 | Sample code/label | Sample label | DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation | |||
| 3 | Sand | Sand | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 4 | Silt | Silt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 5 | Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay | <2 µm | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 6 | Lithology/composition/facies | Lithology | Smear slide analysis | |||
| 7 | Comment | Comment | Smear slide analysis | |||
| 8 | Radiolarians | Rad | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 9 | Diatoms | Diatoms | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 10 | Silicoflagellates | Silicoflag | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 11 | Spiculae | Spiculae | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 12 | Quartz | Qz | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 13 | Feldspar | Fsp | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 14 | Mica | Mica | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 15 | Clay minerals | Clay min | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 16 | Volcanic glass | Volc glass | % | Smear slide analysis |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
105 data points
Data
| 1 Depth sed [m] | 2 Sample label | 3 Sand [%] | 4 Silt [%] | 5 <2 µm [%] | 6 Lithology | 7 Comment | 8 Rad [%] | 9 Diatoms [%] | 10 Silicoflag [%] | 11 Spiculae [%] | 12 Qz [%] | 13 Fsp [%] | 14 Mica [%] | 15 Clay min [%] | 16 Volc glass [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.35 | 86-579-1-1,35 | 3 | 0 | 67 | PELAGIC SILTY CLAY | relative abundance | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 65 | 5 |
| 1.10 | 86-579-1-11,110 | 18 | 30 | 52 | DIATOM CLAY | numerical abundance | 5 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 2 | 55 | 5 |
| 2.30 | 86-579-1-2,80 | 1 | 30 | 69 | M QTZ 20,FEL 1,MICA 2,CLAY 65,VOLC.GLAS 4 | relative abundance | 3 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4.46 | 86-579-1-31,146 | 20 | 30 | 50 | SILICEOUS CLAY | numerical abundance | 7 | 18 | 1 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 3 | 46 | 5 |
| 5.90 | 86-579-1-41,140 | 15 | 25 | 50 | SILICEOUS CLAY | relative abundance | 6 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 60 | 7 |
| 10.16 | 86-579-2-2,26 | 10 | 25 | 65 | SILICEOUS CLAY | relative abundance | 5 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 65 | 2 |
| 15.00 | 86-579-2-5,60 | 15 | 47 | 68 | SILICEOUS CLAY | relative abundance | 7 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 2 | 2 | 68 | 2 |