/* DATA DESCRIPTION: Citation: Mayer, Larry A; Theyer, Fritz (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 85-575C. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.231133 Related to: DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM Wilkens, Roy H; Weinreich, Norbert; Thomas, Ellen; Stout, Paul M; Saito, Tsunemasa; Pujos, Annick; Pisias, Nicklas G; Nigrini, Catherine A; Jarvis, Ian; Hills, Scott; Handyside, Tim; Dunn, Dean A; Barron, John A; Mayer, L; Theyer, Fritz (1985): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, LXXXV, 999 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.85.1985 Further details: Processed smear slide data base - background and methods (URI: hdl:10013/epic.32353.d001) Project(s): Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) (URI: http://www.deepseadrilling.org/) Coverage: LATITUDE: 5.850000 * LONGITUDE: -135.036000 DATE/TIME START: 1982-04-21T00:00:00 * DATE/TIME END: 1982-04-21T00:00:00 MINIMUM DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.05 m * MAXIMUM DEPTH, sediment/rock: 12.95 m Event(s): 85-575C * LATITUDE: 5.850000 * LONGITUDE: -135.036000 * DATE/TIME: 1982-04-21T00:00:00 * ELEVATION: -4536.0 m * Penetration: 15.8 m * Recovery: 15.9 m * LOCATION: North Pacific/FLANK * CAMPAIGN: Leg85 (URI: https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.85.1985) * BASIS: Glomar Challenger (URI: http://www-odp.tamu.edu/glomar.html) * METHOD/DEVICE: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * COMMENT: 2 cores; 15.8 m cored; 0 m drilled; 100.7 % recovery Parameter(s): DEPTH, sediment/rock [m] (Depth sed) * GEOCODE Sample code/label (Sample label) * METHOD/DEVICE: DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation (URI: hdl:10013/epic.27914.d001) Sand [%] (Sand) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Silt [%] (Silt) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay [%] (<2 µm) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Lithology/composition/facies (Lithology) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Comment (Comment) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Carbonates [%] (Carb) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Nannofossils [%] (Nannos) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Foraminifera [%] (Foram) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Radiolarians [%] (Rad) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Diatoms [%] (Diatoms) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Silicoflagellates [%] (Silicoflag) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Spiculae [%] (Spiculae) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Quartz [%] (Qz) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Clay minerals [%] (Clay min) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Pyrite, FeS2 [%] (Py) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Iron [%] (Fe) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0) (URI: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) Size: 51 data points */ Depth sed [m] Sample label Sand [%] Silt [%] <2 µm [%] Lithology Comment Carb [%] Nannos [%] Foram [%] Rad [%] Diatoms [%] Silicoflag [%] Spiculae [%] Qz [%] Clay min [%] Py [%] Fe [%] 0.05 85-575C-1-1,5 20 30 50 CLAYEY SILICEOUS CALCAREOUS OOZE relative abundance 30 5 5 10 20 2 2 0 15 5 10 1.00 85-575C-1-11,100 10 30 60 CLAYEY SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE relative abundance 25 15 2 5 25 2 2 2 30 2 2 12.95 85-575C-2-5,65 30 40 30 RAD DIATOM NANNO OOZE relative abundance 17 40 3 10 30 0 2 0 2 2 2