Citation:

PANGAEA.231132

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Wilkens, Roy H; Weinreich, Norbert; Thomas, Ellen; Stout, Paul M; Saito, Tsunemasa; Pujos, Annick; Pisias, Nicklas G; Nigrini, Catherine A; Jarvis, Ian; Hills, Scott; Handyside, Tim; Dunn, Dean A; Barron, John A; Mayer, L; Theyer, Fritz (1985): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, LXXXV, 999 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.85.1985

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 5.850000 * Longitude: -135.036000

Date/Time Start: 1982-04-21T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1982-04-21T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 4.05 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 117.17 m

Event(s):

85-575B * Latitude: 5.850000 * Longitude: -135.036000 * Date/Time: 1982-04-21T00:00:00 * Elevation: -4536.0 m * Penetration: 119 m * Recovery: 118.7 m * Location: North Pacific/FLANK * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 14 cores; 118.3 m cored; 0 m drilled; 100.3 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
7	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
8	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
9	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Silicoflagellates	Silicoflag	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Pyrite, FeS2	Py	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Iron	Fe	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

425 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Lithology	7 Comment	8 Carb [%]	9 Nannos [%]	10 Foram [%]	11 Rad [%]	12 Diatoms [%]	13 Silicoflag [%]	14 Spiculae [%]	15 Clay min [%]	16 Py [%]	17 Fe [%]	18 Volc glass [%]
4.05	85-575B-1-1,75	15	10	75	SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	8	70	8	8	4	0	2	0	1	1	0
5.10	85-575B-1-2,30	45	35	20	NANNO RAD FORAM OOZE	relative abundance	30	15	20	20	9	2	2	4	1	1	0
13.30	85-575B-2-11,130	40	30	30	CALCAREOUS DIATOM RAD OOZE	relative abundance	30	8	5	25	20	2	2	9	2	1	0
16.70	85-575B-2-4,20	20	30	50	RAD NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	35	33	5	12	8	2	2	5	1	1	0
20.25	85-575B-2-6,75	8	7	85	NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	40	50	3	4	3	0	2	0	2	0	0
22.70	85-575B-3-2,20	15	5	80	RAD NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	70	14	1	12	3	2	2	0	2	0	0
28.10	85-575B-3-51,110	10	5	85	NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	17	70	4	7	2	2	2	0	0	0	0
31.75	85-575B-4-2,75	10	5	85	NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	75	15	2	7	1	2	2	0	2	0	0
34.70	85-575B-4-4,70	40	10	50	RAD NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	46	12	2	35	5	2	2	0	2	0	0
37.75	85-575B-4-6,75	40	15	45	CALCAREOUS CLAYEY RAD OOZE	relative abundance	21	4	2	35	3	2	2	30	2	1	0
42.75	85-575B-5-3,75	15	5	80	RAD NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	20	60	1	12	2	2	2	3	1	1	0
47.25	85-575B-5-6,75	4	1	95	NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	26	70	2	2	2	2	2	0	0	0	0
51.75	85-575B-6-3,75	8	7	85	NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	15	75	2	7	1	0	2	0	0	0	0
59.80	85-575B-7-31,140	7	3	90	NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	12	80	2	5	1	0	2	0	0	2	0
66.95	85-575B-8-2,75	5	30	65	SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	0	86	3	5	5	2	2	0	2	0	0
77.55	85-575B-9-3,75	2	20	78	NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	0	86	5	3	5	0	2	0	2	2	0
85.15	85-575B-10-3,75	3	15	82	CALCAREOUS OOZE	relative abundance	70	18	5	5	2	2	2	0	2	0	0
86.67	85-575B-10-4,77	5	45	50	CALCAREOUS RAD OOZE	relative abundance	35	10	2	45	9	0	2	0	0	0	0
94.65	85-575B-11-3,75	0	20	80	NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	20	75	2	2	1	0	0	0	2	0	0
103.35	85-575B-12-3,75	1	30	69	NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	30	55	5	4	4	2	2	0	2	2	0
106.90	85-575B-12-51,130	25	50	25	CLAYEY CALCAREOUS RAD OOZE	relative abundance	15	5	0	50	8	2	1	15	2	5	0
111.30	85-575B-13-2,60	2	20	78	SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	35	50	5	5	5	0	2	0	0	2	0
113.20	85-575B-13-31,100	25	50	25	CALCAREOUS RAD OOZE	relative abundance	25	10	2	55	5	0	2	5	0	2	0
116.35	85-575B-14-2,75	3	25	72	SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	10	75	5	5	5	0	2	0	2	2	0
117.17	85-575B-14-3,7	25	50	25	CALCAREOUS RAD OOZE	relative abundance	20	15	2	50	10	0	2	5	0	2	2