Citation:

PANGAEA.231130

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Wilkens, Roy H; Weinreich, Norbert; Thomas, Ellen; Stout, Paul M; Saito, Tsunemasa; Pujos, Annick; Pisias, Nicklas G; Nigrini, Catherine A; Jarvis, Ian; Hills, Scott; Handyside, Tim; Dunn, Dean A; Barron, John A; Mayer, L; Theyer, Fritz (1985): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, LXXXV, 999 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.85.1985

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 5.850000 * Longitude: -135.036000

Date/Time Start: 1982-04-21T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1982-04-21T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.45 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 93.85 m

Event(s):

85-575 * Latitude: 5.850000 * Longitude: -135.036000 * Date/Time: 1982-04-21T00:00:00 * Elevation: -4536.0 m * Penetration: 98.6 m * Recovery: 99.4 m * Location: North Pacific/FLANK * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 11 cores; 98.6 m cored; 0 m drilled; 100.8 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
7	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
8	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
9	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Silicoflagellates	Silicoflag	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Pyrite, FeS2	Py	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Iron	Fe	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

374 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Lithology	7 Comment	8 Carb [%]	9 Nannos [%]	10 Foram [%]	11 Rad [%]	12 Diatoms [%]	13 Silicoflag [%]	14 Spiculae [%]	15 Clay min [%]	16 Py [%]	17 Fe [%]	18 Volc glass [%]
0.45	85-575-1-1,45	10	25	65	CLAYEY SILICEOUS CALCAREOUS OOZE	relative abundance	25	10	5	20	18	2	0	15	2	5	2
1.00	85-575-1-11,100	10	25	65	CLAYEY SILICEOUS CALCAREOUS OOZE	relative abundance	25	15	2	15	20	0	2	20	2	2	0
1.70	85-575-1-2,20	5	10	85	FORAM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	0	85	10	1	4	2	0	0	2	2	0
2.58	85-575-1-21,108	40	10	50	FORAM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	0	60	40	0	0	0	0	0	2	2	0
6.75	85-575-1-5,75	5	35	60	CLAYEY SILICEOUS CALCAREOUS OOZE	relative abundance	30	5	0	15	20	2	2	10	5	15	0
8.05	85-575-2-1,75	15	40	45	CLAYEY SILICEOUS CALCAREOUS OOZE	relative abundance	25	15	2	15	15	0	0	10	10	10	0
14.20	85-575-2-5,90	5	55	40	RAD DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	10	60	2	13	15	2	2	2	0	0	0
15.55	85-575-2-6,75	2	15	83	NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	0	92	1	5	2	2	2	0	0	0	0
19.55	85-575-3-21,125	35	15	50	RAD NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	20	40	2	30	8	2	2	0	0	0	0
23.55	85-575-3-5,75	25	5	70	RAD NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	40	34	2	20	4	2	2	2	0	0	0
26.80	85-575-4-1,50	50	10	40	CLAYEY RAD OOZE	relative abundance	6	3	0	45	5	0	3	37	1	2	2
30.05	85-575-4-3,75	20	10	70	RAD NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	48	25	1	17	7	2	1	1	2	0	0
33.05	85-575-4-5,75	9	3	88	NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	43	45	2	7	2	2	2	2	1	0	0
39.80	85-575-5-4,30	10	10	80	SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	23	60	2	9	6	2	2	0	0	0	0
49.20	85-575-6-4,20	10	5	85	NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	22	65	5	7	1	0	2	0	0	0	0
58.80	85-575-7-4,30	17	3	80	RAD NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	25	55	5	12	3	0	2	0	0	0	0
65.75	85-575-8-2,75	10	5	85	NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	25	60	6	4	5	2	2	0	0	0	0
69.06	85-575-8-41,106	50	15	35	NANNO FORAM OOZE	relative abundance	5	35	50	1	1	0	2	0	8	0	2
71.75	85-575-8-6,75	15	5	80	NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	7	75	9	6	2	2	1	0	2	0	0
78.25	85-575-9-4,75	17	3	80	SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	9	70	9	9	3	0	2	0	0	0	2
84.60	85-575-10-31,140	20	10	70	SILICEOUS FORAM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	30	40	15	6	9	0	2	0	2	0	0
93.85	85-575-11-4,25	15	5	80	NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	12	70	9	6	3	0	2	0	2	0	2