Citation:

PANGAEA.231123

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Wilkens, Roy H; Weinreich, Norbert; Thomas, Ellen; Stout, Paul M; Saito, Tsunemasa; Pujos, Annick; Pisias, Nicklas G; Nigrini, Catherine A; Jarvis, Ian; Hills, Scott; Handyside, Tim; Dunn, Dean A; Barron, John A; Mayer, L; Theyer, Fritz (1985): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, LXXXV, 999 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.85.1985

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 0.498500 * Longitude: -133.309500

Date/Time Start: 1982-04-02T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1982-04-02T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.10 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 155.90 m

Event(s):

85-573 * Latitude: 0.498500 * Longitude: -133.309500 * Date/Time: 1982-04-02T00:00:00 * Elevation: -4301.0 m * Penetration: 158.6 m * Recovery: 159 m * Location: North Pacific/TROUGH * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 19 cores; 158.6 m cored; 0 m drilled; 100.6 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
7	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
8	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
9	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Silicoflagellates	Silicoflag	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Pyrite, FeS2	Py	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Iron	Fe	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

680 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Lithology	7 Comment	8 Carb [%]	9 Nannos [%]	10 Foram [%]	11 Rad [%]	12 Diatoms [%]	13 Silicoflag [%]	14 Spiculae [%]	15 Clay min [%]	16 Py [%]	17 Fe [%]	18 Volc glass [%]
0.10	85-573-1-1,10	35	20	45	CLAYEY RAD DIATOM FORAM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	10	32	20	10	15	2	0	10	0	3	2
0.80	85-573-1-1,80	20	25	55	FORAM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	5	55	30	2	7	2	0	2	0	1	0
1.55	85-573-1-2,5	25	25	50	CLAYEY DIATOM RAD FORAM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	20	30	20	10	10	2	0	10	0	2	2
3.85	85-573-2-2,35	20	20	60	FORAM RAD NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	33	30	12	17	8	0	0	0	0	0	2
6.00	85-573-2-31,100	15	15	70	SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	7	70	8	9	6	0	0	2	0	2	2
9.60	85-573-2-6,10	10	10	80	FORAM NANNO OOZE	numerical abundance	5	80	12	2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0
14.70	85-573-3-3,20	25	10	65	SILICEOUS FORAM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	6	65	18	7	4	2	0	0	0	0	0
19.60	85-573-3-6,60	15	20	65	SILICEOUS FORAM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	12	65	12	4	7	2	0	0	0	0	2
23.75	85-573-4-21,125	25	10	65	FORAM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	13	65	12	5	4	2	0	0	0	1	0
28.30	85-573-4-51,130	15	15	70	SILICEOUS FORAM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	18	55	12	9	6	2	0	0	0	0	0
34.82	85-573-5-31,132	10	10	80	FORAM NANNO OOZE	numerical abundance	5	75	11	4	3	0	0	0	0	2	0
37.55	85-573-5-51,105	5	10	85	NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	5	80	9	3	3	2	0	2	0	0	0
43.05	85-573-6-3,75	15	10	75	SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	20	55	9	9	7	2	0	0	0	0	0
46.50	85-573-6-51,120	7	8	85	M CARB 10	numerical abundance	0	80	1	7	2	0	0	0	0	0	0
50.45	85-573-7-2,95	10	5	85	SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE	numerical abundance	20	65	2	9	4	0	0	0	0	0	0
54.35	85-573-7-5,35	10	15	75	SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	30	45	7	9	9	2	0	0	2	0	2
61.80	85-573-8-4,30	15	5	80	RAD DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	0	63	2	10	25	2	2	0	0	0	0
65.75	85-573-8-61,125	10	15	75	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	0	80	5	5	10	2	2	0	0	0	0
67.50	85-573-9-1,80	5	10	85	SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	0	84	4	4	8	2	2	0	2	0	0
68.99	85-573-9-2,79	15	10	75	SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	0	85	5	5	5	2	2	2	0	0	0
73.90	85-573-9-51,120	15	10	75	RAD DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	0	75	5	10	10	2	2	2	2	0	2
76.90	85-573-10-1,70	3	15	82	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	0	75	4	5	15	1	2	0	2	0	0
79.90	85-573-10-3,70	5	25	70	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	15	70	0	5	10	2	2	0	2	0	0
83.45	85-573-10-51,125	25	25	50	RAD FORAM DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	0	70	10	10	10	2	0	0	0	0	2
86.60	85-573-11-1,90	10	15	75	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	10	70	5	5	10	2	2	0	0	0	2
91.90	85-573-11-5,20	20	30	50	RAD DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	9	60	1	10	20	2	2	0	2	0	0
94.00	85-573-11-6,80	10	20	70	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	5	80	2	3	10	2	2	0	2	0	0
95.88	85-573-12-1,68	10	20	70	SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	5	81	4	2	8	0	2	0	0	0	0
100.03	85-573-12-4,33	2	10	88	NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	10	83	1	2	4	0	2	0	2	0	0
101.30	85-573-12-5,10	2	35	63	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	10	44	2	5	40	1	2	0	2	0	0
105.80	85-573-13-2,30	10	10	80	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	10	65	5	5	15	2	0	0	2	0	2
110.58	85-573-13-5,58	10	30	60	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	10	60	2	2	25	1	0	0	2	0	2
111.95	85-573-13-6,45	1	30	69	NANNO DIATOM OOZE	relative abundance	0	43	2	2	45	1	0	0	2	1	0
119.75	85-573-14-51,115	5	15	80	NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	5	85	1	3	6	2	2	0	2	0	2
122.90	85-573-15-1,80	5	30	65	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	5	80	0	5	10	2	2	0	2	0	2
131.05	85-573-15-61,145	15	20	65	RAD DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	10	65	5	10	10	2	0	0	1	0	0
136.82	85-573-16-41,102	10	20	70	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	10	70	2	5	15	2	2	0	2	0	0
143.35	85-573-17-3,25	3	2	95	NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	60	35	2	4	1	2	0	0	2	0	2
151.42	85-573-18-2,92	3	2	95	NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	60	35	1	3	1	2	0	0	2	0	2
155.90	85-573-19-2,40	5	10	85	SILICEOUS CALCAREOUS OOZE	relative abundance	75	9	1	6	9	0	0	0	2	0	2