Citation:

PANGAEA.231122

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Wilkens, Roy H; Weinreich, Norbert; Thomas, Ellen; Stout, Paul M; Saito, Tsunemasa; Pujos, Annick; Pisias, Nicklas G; Nigrini, Catherine A; Jarvis, Ian; Hills, Scott; Handyside, Tim; Dunn, Dean A; Barron, John A; Mayer, L; Theyer, Fritz (1985): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, LXXXV, 999 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.85.1985

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 1.434800 * Longitude: -113.842000

Date/Time Start: 1982-03-22T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1982-03-22T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 153.32 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 464.63 m

Event(s):

85-572D * Latitude: 1.434800 * Longitude: -113.842000 * Date/Time: 1982-03-22T00:00:00 * Elevation: -3893.0 m * Penetration: 489 m * Recovery: 258.9 m * Location: North Pacific * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 34 cores; 323 m cored; 0 m drilled; 80.1 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
7	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
8	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
9	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Silicoflagellates	Silicoflag	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Quartz	Qz	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Zeolite	Zeo	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Pyrite, FeS2	Py	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Iron	Fe	%	Smear slide analysis
20	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis
21	Micronodules	Micronod	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

960 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Lithology	7 Comment	8 Carb [%]	9 Nannos [%]	10 Foram [%]	11 Rad [%]	12 Diatoms [%]	13 Silicoflag [%]	14 Spiculae [%]	15 Qz [%]	16 Zeo [%]	17 Clay min [%]	18 Py [%]	19 Fe [%]	20 Volc glass [%]	21 Micronod [%]
153.32	85-572D-1-2,82	5	30	65	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	5	68	1	1	25	2	2	0	2	0	0	0	0	0
161.40	85-572D-2-1,90	3	40	57	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	numerical abundance	5	52	1	1	40	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
164.13	85-572D-2-3,63	2	40	58	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	5	24	1	1	60	1	0	0	2	5	3	0	0	0
169.40	85-572D-2-61,140	2	55	43	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	3	20	2	1	70	1	0	0	0	5	0	0	0	0
172.90	85-572D-3-21,140	5	45	50	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	0	55	2	2	40	2	0	0	0	5	0	0	2	0
175.17	85-572D-3-4,67	2	60	38	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	5	20	2	1	60	1	0	0	0	3	10	0	0	0
183.15	85-572D-4-3,65	15	30	55	M CLAY 5,CARB 1	relative abundance	0	50	2	5	35	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
193.90	85-572D-5-4,40	20	30	50	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	10	50	5	5	30	2	2	0	0	2	2	0	0	0
200.70	85-572D-6-2,70	35	15	50	PYRITE BEARING NANNO DIATOM OOZE	relative abundance	5	30	2	2	40	2	0	2	2	3	20	0	2	0
211.94	85-572D-7-3,94	4	8	88	NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	14	75	1	2	6	1	2	0	0	0	2	2	2	0
221.55	85-572D-8-31,105	8	22	70	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	10	65	1	7	15	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	2	0
229.20	85-572D-9-2,70	5	15	80	SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	17	65	1	6	9	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	2	0
240.95	85-572D-10-31,145	3	7	90	M VOLC.GLAS TR,PYR TR,CARB 37	relative abundance	0	55	1	3	3	1	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
247.03	85-572D-11-11,103	5	10	85	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	55	28	2	3	12	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	2	0
253.02	85-572D-11-51,102	10	15	75	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	50	25	2	9	15	2	0	0	0	0	1	0	2	0
260.50	85-572D-12-4,50	6	10	84	SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	19	65	2	9	5	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	2	0
268.50	85-572D-13-3,50	5	35	60	RAD DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	5	60	2	10	25	2	2	0	2	0	0	0	0	0
272.35	85-572D-13-51,135	10	60	30	NANNO DIATOM OOZE	relative abundance	0	25	2	8	65	2	2	0	2	0	0	0	2	0
276.82	85-572D-14-2,82	5	40	55	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	2	53	2	8	35	2	0	0	0	0	2	0	2	0
279.99	85-572D-14-4,99	10	25	65	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	2	55	8	5	30	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
285.27	85-572D-15-11,127	10	35	55	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	5	55	1	8	30	2	2	0	0	0	1	0	0	0
293.52	85-572D-16-1,2	1	90	9	DIATOM OOZE	relative abundance	0	5	0	1	93	0	2	0	2	0	1	0	2	0
294.07	85-572D-16-1,57	10	25	65	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	0	10	2	3	25	2	0	0	0	0	2	0	2	0
297.03	85-572D-16-3,53	15	15	70	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	5	75	5	5	10	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0
300.50	85-572D-16-51,100	15	15	70	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	0	60	5	10	25	0	2	0	2	0	0	0	0	0
313.65	85-572D-18-11,115	20	25	55	RAD DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	0	45	5	15	35	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0
317.45	85-572D-18-4,45	10	30	60	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	numerical abundance	0	53	1	8	35	2	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0
321.09	85-572D-18-CC,0	15	45	40	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	2	64	1	3	30	2	0	0	0	0	2	0	2	0
334.25	85-572D-20-21,125	15	35	50	RAD FORAMS DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	0	50	10	10	30	2	2	0	0	0	2	0	0	0
334.70	85-572D-20-3,20	25	30	45	FORAM DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	0	45	15	5	35	2	2	0	0	0	2	0	2	0
347.70	85-572D-21-5,70	5	40	55	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	5	50	3	7	35	2	2	0	0	0	2	0	2	0
353.01	85-572D-22-21,101	5	10	85	SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	37	45	2	9	7	2	0	0	0	0	2	0	2	0
364.35	85-572D-23-31,135	5	7	88	NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	48	40	3	2	7	2	2	0	0	0	2	0	0	0
371.92	85-572D-24-2,92	10	5	85	SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	40	45	4	4	7	2	0	0	0	0	2	0	2	0
384.87	85-572D-25-41,137	10	10	80	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	15	65	2	1	15	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	2
394.03	85-572D-26-41,103	10	5	85	SILICEOUS NANNO CHALK	relative abundance	30	65	4	4	7	2	0	0	0	0	2	0	2	0
400.32	85-572D-27-2,82	25	30	45	DIATOM NANNO CHALK	relative abundance	0	50	2	8	40	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0
405.98	85-572D-27-6,48	25	20	55	DIATOM NANNO CHALK	relative abundance	0	67	2	5	25	0	2	0	0	0	1	0	0	0
408.81	85-572D-28-11,131	20	20	60	RAD FORAMS DIATOM NANNO CHALK	relative abundance	0	50	10	10	30	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0
411.25	85-572D-28-3,75	20	30	50	RAD FORAM DIATOM NANNO CHALK	relative abundance	0	50	10	10	30	1	0	0	0	0	2	0	0	0
417.90	85-572D-29-1,90	20	30	50	FORAM RAD DIATOM NANNO CHALK	relative abundance	0	45	10	10	35	2	0	0	0	0	2	0	0	0
428.90	85-572D-30-2,90	20	30	50	FORAM RAD DIATOM NANNO CHALK	relative abundance	0	45	15	10	30	0	0	0	0	0	2	0	0	0
436.70	85-572D-31-1,70	10	40	50	SILICEOUS FORAM NANNO CHALK	relative abundance	20	43	25	7	5	2	2	0	0	0	2	0	2	0
441.36	85-572D-31-4,86	20	40	40	FORAM NANNO CHALK	relative abundance	35	33	25	5	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0
447.83	85-572D-32-2,83	30	30	40	SILICEOUS FORAM NANNO CHALK	relative abundance	25	40	25	5	5	2	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0
459.06	85-572D-33-31,106	30	30	40	SILICEOUS FORAM NANNO CHALK	relative abundance	25	40	20	8	7	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
461.80	85-572D-33-5,80	20	20	60	FORAM NANNO CHALK	numerical abundance	38	35	20	5	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
464.63	85-572D-33-CC,0	35	30	35	FE BEARING FORAM NANNO CHALK	relative abundance	15	50	20	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	5	10	0	0