Citation:

PANGAEA.231121

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Wilkens, Roy H; Weinreich, Norbert; Thomas, Ellen; Stout, Paul M; Saito, Tsunemasa; Pujos, Annick; Pisias, Nicklas G; Nigrini, Catherine A; Jarvis, Ian; Hills, Scott; Handyside, Tim; Dunn, Dean A; Barron, John A; Mayer, L; Theyer, Fritz (1985): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, LXXXV, 999 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.85.1985

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 1.434800 * Longitude: -113.842000

Date/Time Start: 1982-03-22T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1982-03-22T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 1.14 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 165.00 m

Event(s):

85-572C * Latitude: 1.434800 * Longitude: -113.842000 * Date/Time: 1982-03-22T00:00:00 * Elevation: -3893.0 m * Penetration: 169.5 m * Recovery: 161.6 m * Location: North Pacific * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 20 cores; 169.5 m cored; 0 m drilled; 95.3 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
7	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
8	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
9	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Silicoflagellates	Silicoflag	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Zeolite	Zeo	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Pyrite, FeS2	Py	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Iron	Fe	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

522 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Lithology	7 Comment	8 Carb [%]	9 Nannos [%]	10 Foram [%]	11 Rad [%]	12 Diatoms [%]	13 Silicoflag [%]	14 Spiculae [%]	15 Zeo [%]	16 Clay min [%]	17 Py [%]	18 Fe [%]	19 Volc glass [%]
1.14	85-572C-1-11,114	30	30	40	RAD FORAM DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	0	40	15	10	35	2	0	0	0	0	0	2
2.40	85-572C-1-2,90	15	35	50	STAINED RAD FORAM DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	15	35	10	10	30	2	0	2	0	0	0	2
10.85	85-572C-2-1,75	15	25	60	FORAM DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	15	42	10	3	30	2	2	0	0	0	0	0
21.95	85-572C-3-2,75	20	40	40	RAD FORAM DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	10	35	15	10	30	2	2	2	0	2	0	0
31.30	85-572C-4-2,50	20	30	50	RAD FORAM DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	10	35	15	10	25	2	2	2	0	0	0	2
43.32	85-572C-5-31,142	15	10	75	SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	9	75	3	4	8	1	2	0	0	0	0	2
50.53	85-572C-6-2,53	25	10	65	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	5	65	5	9	16	2	2	0	0	0	0	2
57.06	85-572C-6-61,106	15	15	70	SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	6	70	5	9	9	2	2	0	0	1	0	2
59.10	85-572C-7-11,100	10	10	80	SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	3	80	2	6	9	2	2	0	0	0	2	2
65.50	85-572C-7-51,140	10	10	80	SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	5	80	5	7	3	2	2	0	0	2	0	2
70.90	85-572C-8-3,20	10	15	75	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	4	75	6	4	11	2	2	0	0	0	0	2
76.68	85-572C-8-61,148	2	70	28	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	2	27	2	1	70	2	0	0	2	2	0	2
78.90	85-572C-9-2,10	15	10	75	SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	2	75	9	4	9	1	2	0	0	0	0	0
82.87	85-572C-9-41,107	5	15	80	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	4	80	1	3	12	2	2	0	0	0	0	2
90.95	85-572C-10-31,105	5	5	90	NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	2	90	2	2	3	1	0	0	0	0	0	2
98.80	85-572C-11-2,80	5	20	75	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	4	75	2	3	15	1	0	0	0	0	0	2
103.80	85-572C-12-2,80	5	25	70	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	13	40	5	2	40	2	2	0	0	0	0	2
108.87	85-572C-13-2,87	10	40	50	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	11	40	3	6	40	2	2	0	0	0	0	2
113.77	85-572C-14-2,77	5	45	50	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	5	45	2	8	40	2	0	2	0	0	0	2
117.04	85-572C-14-41,104	2	50	48	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	0	40	2	2	60	0	0	0	0	2	0	0
122.00	85-572C-15-1,90	20	30	50	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	8	50	8	4	30	2	2	0	0	0	0	0
122.17	85-572C-15-11,107	5	35	60	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	numerical abundance	17	45	2	1	30	5	0	0	0	0	0	0
133.13	85-572C-16-2,93	5	45	50	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	10	40	1	4	40	2	2	0	3	0	0	2
135.87	85-572C-16-4,67	15	40	45	RAD FORAM DIATOM NANNO OOE	relative abundance	8	40	10	10	30	2	2	0	0	2	0	0
142.57	85-572C-17-2,77	15	35	50	DIATOM OOZE	relative abundance	10	40	4	4	40	2	2	0	0	0	0	0
145.80	85-572C-17-41,100	10	40	50	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	10	40	3	6	40	1	0	0	0	0	0	2
151.13	85-572C-18-11,123	5	45	50	NANNO DIATOM OOZE	numerical abundance	10	35	4	6	40	5	0	0	0	0	0	0
157.19	85-572C-18-51,129	3	47	50	NANNO DIATOM OOZE	numerical abundance	0	65	3	1	30	1	0	0	0	0	0	0
165.00	85-572C-20-1,50	5	50	45	NANNO DIATOM OOZE	relative abundance	5	30	1	2	60	2	2	0	0	2	0	0