Citation:

PANGAEA.231117

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Wilkens, Roy H; Weinreich, Norbert; Thomas, Ellen; Stout, Paul M; Saito, Tsunemasa; Pujos, Annick; Pisias, Nicklas G; Nigrini, Catherine A; Jarvis, Ian; Hills, Scott; Handyside, Tim; Dunn, Dean A; Barron, John A; Mayer, L; Theyer, Fritz (1985): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, LXXXV, 999 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.85.1985

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 3.997300 * Longitude: -114.142200

Date/Time Start: 1982-03-19T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1982-03-19T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.12 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 7.05 m

Event(s):

85-571 * Latitude: 3.997300 * Longitude: -114.142200 * Date/Time: 1982-03-19T00:00:00 * Elevation: -3962.0 m * Penetration: 7.1 m * Recovery: 7.1 m * Location: North Pacific * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 1 cores; 7.1 m cored; 0 m drilled; 100.1 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
7	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
8	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
9	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Silicoflagellates	Silicoflag	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Iron	Fe	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Terrigenous	Terr	%	Smear slide analysis	terrigeneous detritus

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

160 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Lithology	7 Comment	8 Carb [%]	9 Nannos [%]	10 Foram [%]	11 Rad [%]	12 Diatoms [%]	13 Silicoflag [%]	14 Clay min [%]	15 Fe [%]	16 Volc glass [%]	17 Terr [%]
0.12	85-571-1-1,12	38	22	40	SILICEOUS FORAM NANNO OOZE	numerical abundance	16	40	35	3	4	1	0	2	0	0
0.70	85-571-1-1,70	37	23	40	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	17	40	35	2	6	1	0	0	0	0
2.07	85-571-1-2,57	7	23	70	DIATOM FORAM NANNO OOZE	numerical abundance	16	65	4	3	7	0	0	5	0	0
2.75	85-571-1-21,125	35	20	45	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	50	35	2	8	0	2	0	2	0
3.32	85-571-1-3,32	30	20	50	FORAM DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	5	50	12	8	25	2	2	0	2	0
4.28	85-571-1-31,128	25	25	50	NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	15	60	8	8	9	2	0	0	0	0
5.63	85-571-1-41,113	25	15	60	FORAM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	2	65	20	5	8	0	2	0	0	0
6.46	85-571-1-5,46	10	20	70	NANNO OOZE	numerical abundance	6	80	9	2	2	1	0	0	0	0
6.94	85-571-1-CC,3	25	15	60	FORAM NANNO OOZE	numerical abundance	10	60	20	5	5	1	0	0	0	0
7.05	85-571-1-CC,14	15	5	80	FORAM NANNO OOZE	numerical abundance	20	60	10	5	5	0	0	0	0	1