Bougault, Henri; Cande, Steven C (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 82-556 [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.231100
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Related to:
DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM
Weaver, Barry L; Rideout, M L; Neuser, R D; Khan, Mohammad Javed; Hill, Ian Ashley; Echols, D J; Drake, N; Curtis, Doris M; Clark, Murlene W; Christie, David M; Brannon, Joyce C; Mills, William; Bougault, Henri; Cande, Steven C (1985): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, LXXXII, 667 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.82.1985
Further details:
Project(s):
Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)
Coverage:
Latitude: 38.939700 * Longitude: -34.685300
Date/Time Start: 1981-09-22T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1981-09-22T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.88 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 481.88 m
Event(s):
82-556 * Latitude: 38.939700 * Longitude: -34.685300 * Date/Time: 1981-09-22T00:00:00 * Elevation: -3672.0 m * Penetration: 639 m * Recovery: 80.9 m * Location: North Atlantic/RIDGE * Campaign: Leg82 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 20 cores; 166 m cored; 0 m drilled; 48.7 % recovery
Parameter(s):
# | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DEPTH, sediment/rock | Depth sed | m | Geocode | ||
2 | Sample code/label | Sample label | DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation | |||
3 | Sand | Sand | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
4 | Silt | Silt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
5 | Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay | <2 µm | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
6 | Stratigraphy | Stratigraphy | Smear slide analysis | |||
7 | Lithology/composition/facies | Lithology | Smear slide analysis | |||
8 | Comment | Comment | Smear slide analysis | |||
9 | Nannofossils | Nannos | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
10 | Foraminifera | Foram | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
11 | Radiolarians | Rad | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
12 | Diatoms | Diatoms | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
13 | Silicoflagellates | Silicoflag | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
14 | Spiculae | Spiculae | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
15 | Iron | Fe | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
16 | Basalt | Basalt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
17 | Fecal pellets | Fecal pel | % | Smear slide analysis |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
426 data points
Data
1 Depth sed [m] | 2 Sample label | 3 Sand [%] | 4 Silt [%] | 5 <2 µm [%] | 6 Stratigraphy | 7 Lithology | 8 Comment | 9 Nannos [%] | 10 Foram [%] | 11 Rad [%] | 12 Diatoms [%] | 13 Silicoflag [%] | 14 Spiculae [%] | 15 Fe [%] | 16 Basalt [%] | 17 Fecal pel [%] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.88 | 82-556-1-1,88 | 0 | 10 | 90 | Pleistocene | FORAM NANNOFOSSIL OOZE M FEL TR,PALAG TR | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 82 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2.06 | 82-556-1-2,56 | 0 | 5 | 95 | Pleistocene | SILICEOUS NANNOFOSSIL OOZE M FEL TR,VOLC.GLAS TR,PYR TR | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 80 | 5 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2.20 | 82-556-1-2,70 | 0 | 3 | 97 | Pleistocene | SILICEOUS NANNOFOSSIL OOZE M PALAG TR,PYR TR | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 80 | 3 | 5 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3.94 | 82-556-1-3,94 | 0 | 15 | 85 | Pleistocene | FORAM NANNOFOSSIL OOZE M VOLC.GLAS TR,PALAG TR | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 85 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5.49 | 82-556-1-4,99 | 0 | 5 | 95 | Pleistocene | NANNOFOSSIL OOZE M PALAG TR | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 93 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5.74 | 82-556-1-41,124 | 0 | 15 | 85 | Pleistocene | FORAM NANNOFOSSIL OOZE M CLAY TR,PALAG TR | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 85 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6.09 | 82-556-1-CC,0 | 0 | 5 | 95 | Pleistocene | NANNOFOSSIL OOZE M CLAY 2,PALAG TR,CARB 3 | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 90 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15.60 | 82-556-H1-CC,0 | 0 | 15 | 85 | Pliocene | FORAM NANNOFOSSIL OOZE M FEL TR,PALAG TR | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 85 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
98.70 | 82-556-H2-11,120 | 0 | 5 | 95 | Upper miocene | NANNOFOSSIL OOZE M HVY.MINS TR,CLAY 5 | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 90 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
99.60 | 82-556-H2-2,60 | 0 | 10 | 90 | Upper miocene | FORAM NANNOFOSSIL OOZE M PALAG TR,PYR TR | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 90 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
145.70 | 82-556-H3-1,70 | 0 | 2 | 98 | Upper miocene | NANNOFOSSIL OOZE M PALAG TR | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 98 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
192.61 | 82-556-H4-1,11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Tertiary | NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,PALAG TR,CARB 5 | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 95 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
193.26 | 82-556-H4-1,76 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Tertiary | NANNO CHALK M CARB 5 | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 95 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
194.41 | 82-556-H4-2,41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Tertiary | NANNOFOSSIL OOZE M QTZ TR,CARB 2 | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 98 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
195.08 | 82-556-H4-21,108 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Tertiary | NANNOFOSSIL CHALK M QTZ 1,HVY.MINS TR,VOLC.GLAS 1,CARB 2 | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 95 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
195.60 | 82-556-H4-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Tertiary | NANNOFOSSIL OOZE M FEL 1,PALAG TR,CARB 3 | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 93 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
466.05 | 82-556-2-4,5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower oligocene | LIMESTONE M FEL 1,VOLC.GLAS 2,PALAG 1,BASALT.FRAGS 1, CARB 90 | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
466.05 | 82-556-2-4,5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower oligocene | M FEL 2,VOLC.GLAS 1,PALAG 1,BASALT.FRAGS 1,CARB 90 | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
466.47 | 82-556-2-4,47 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower oligocene | LIMESTONE M FEL 3,VOLC.GLAS 2,PALAG TR,BASALT.FRAGS 2, CARB 90 | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
468.31 | 82-556-2-5,81 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower oligocene | LIMESTONE M FEL 2,HVY.MINS 1,VOLC.GLAS 2,PALAG 3, BASALT.FRAGS 1,CARB 91 | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
471.00 | 82-556-3-1,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower oligocene | LIMESTONE M FEL TR,VOLC.GLAS TR,PALAG TR,CARB 98 | numerical abundance | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
480.06 | 82-556-4-1,6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | BASALTIC NANNO CHALK M FEL 5,HVY.MINS 5,VOLC.GLAS 5,PALAG 5,CARB 80 | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
480.40 | 82-556-4-1,40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | LIMESTONE M FEL 1,HVY.MINS TR,VOLC.GLAS TR,PALAG TR,CARB 98 | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
481.32 | 82-556-4-11,132 | 0 | 0 | 0 | MARTY CHALK M CLAY 30,VOLC.MINS 10,CARB 85 | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
481.35 | 82-556-4-11,135 | 0 | 0 | 0 | VOLCANIC/INTRACLASTIC CHALK M FEL 2,HVY.MINS 2,VOLCANICLASTS 2,VOLC.GLAS | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | |
481.35 | 82-556-4-11,135 | 0 | 0 | 0 | LIMESTONE M FEL 2,HVY.MINS TR,VOLC.GLAS TR,PALAG TR, CARB 95 | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
481.88 | 82-556-4-2,38 | 0 | 0 | 0 | CHALK W/BASALT M VOLC.MINS 7,CARB 90 | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |