Roberts, David G; Schnitker, Detmar (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 81-554 [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.231097
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Related to:
DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM
Zimmerman, Herman; Westberg-Smith, M J; Murray, John W; Morton, Andrew C; Krumsiek, Klaus A O; Kaltenback, A J; Huddlestun, P; Homrighausen, Reiner; Desprairies, Alain; Baldauf, Jack G; Backman, Jan; Keene, John B; Roberts, David G; Schnitker, Detmar (1984): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, LXXXI, 923 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.81.1984
Further details:
Project(s):
Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)
Coverage:
Latitude: 56.290200 * Longitude: -23.528200
Date/Time Start: 1981-08-27T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1981-08-27T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.40 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 71.70 m
Event(s):
81-554 * Latitude: 56.290200 * Longitude: -23.528200 * Date/Time: 1981-08-27T00:00:00 * Elevation: -2576.0 m * Penetration: 76 m * Recovery: 53.7 m * Location: North Atlantic/PLATEAU * Campaign: Leg81 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 7 cores; 66.5 m cored; 9.5 m drilled; 80.8 % recovery
Parameter(s):
| # | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DEPTH, sediment/rock | Depth sed | m | Geocode | ||
| 2 | Sample code/label | Sample label | DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation | |||
| 3 | Sand | Sand | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 4 | Silt | Silt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 5 | Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay | <2 µm | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 6 | Stratigraphy | Stratigraphy | Smear slide analysis | |||
| 7 | Lithology/composition/facies | Lithology | Smear slide analysis | |||
| 8 | Comment | Comment | Smear slide analysis | |||
| 9 | Nannofossils | Nannos | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 10 | Foraminifera | Foram | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 11 | Radiolarians | Rad | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 12 | Diatoms | Diatoms | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 13 | Silicoflagellates | Silicoflag | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 14 | Spiculae | Spiculae | % | Smear slide analysis |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
208 data points
Data
| 1 Depth sed [m] | 2 Sample label | 3 Sand [%] | 4 Silt [%] | 5 <2 µm [%] | 6 Stratigraphy | 7 Lithology | 8 Comment | 9 Nannos [%] | 10 Foram [%] | 11 Rad [%] | 12 Diatoms [%] | 13 Silicoflag [%] | 14 Spiculae [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.40 | 81-554-1-1,40 | 65 | 15 | 20 | Pleistocene | FORAM OOZE M QTZ 3,HVY.MINS 1,CLAY 5,VOLC.GLAS 2/N DK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 26 | 60 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| 0.76 | 81-554-1-1,76 | 10 | 15 | 75 | Pleistocene | NANNO FORAM MUD M QTZ 2,FEL 1,HVY.MINS 2,CLAY 70,VOLC.GLAS 2, CARB 2 | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 10 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 7.96 | 81-554-1-6,46 | 60 | 10 | 30 | Pleistocene | NANNO FORAM OOZE M QTZ 4,HVY.MINS 1,CLAY 4,VOLC.GLAS 3,CARB 2 | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 45 | 40 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 11.45 | 81-554-2-2,45 | 15 | 15 | 70 | Pleistocene | CALCAREOUS (FORAM) MUD M QTZ 10,FEL 3,HVY.MINS 2,CLAY 55,LITH 3/N CLASTS | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 5 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 12.87 | 81-554-2-3,37 | 25 | 30 | 45 | Pleistocene | SANDY MUD M QTZ 25,FEL 10,HVY.MINS 5,CLAY 45,LITH 5/N CLASTS,VOLC.GLAS 5 | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 13.44 | 81-554-2-3,94 | 30 | 20 | 50 | Pleistocene | FORAM OOZE M QTZ 5,CLAY 15,VOLC.GLAS 1,GLAUC 2,CARB TR | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 35 | 40 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 16.60 | 81-554-2-51,110 | 20 | 25 | 55 | Pleistocene | SANDY MUD M QTZ 15,FEL 5,CLAY 50,LITH 10/N CLASTS, VOLC.GLAS 2,GLAUC 1,P | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 20.76 | 81-554-3-2,26 | 40 | 15 | 45 | Pleistocene | FORAM MARL M QTZ 10,FEL 2,HVY.MINS 2,CLAY 30,LITH 2/N CLASTS, MICRONOD 2 | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 15 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 24.10 | 81-554-3-4,60 | 30 | 10 | 60 | Pleistocene | FORAM OOZE M QTZ 5,FEL 2,HVY.MINS 2,CLAY 20,VOLC.GLAS 1, MICRONOD TR | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 30 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27.39 | 81-554-3-6,89 | 40 | 10 | 50 | Pleistocene | FORAM OOZE M QTZ 3,HVY.MINS TR,CLAY 15,VOLC.GLAS TR/N PALE, PALAG TR | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 35 | 45 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 43.24 | 81-554-5-4,74 | 10 | 5 | 85 | Lower pliocene | FORAM NANNO OOZE M QTZ TR,CLAY 3 | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 80 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 54.07 | 81-554-6-5,57 | 8 | 2 | 90 | Upper miocene | FORAM NANNO OOZE M CLAY 10 | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 80 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 54.92 | 81-554-6-51,142 | 10 | 5 | 85 | Upper miocene | FORAM NANNO OOZE M CLAY 12,VOLC.GLAS 1 | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 74 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 55.32 | 81-554-6-6,32 | 15 | 20 | 65 | Upper miocene | NANNO FORAM OOZE M QTZ 1,CLAY 20,VOLC.GLAS 1 | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 47 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| 60.70 | 81-554-7-3,70 | 15 | 7 | 78 | Upper miocene | FORAM NANNO OOZE M CLAY 8 | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 70 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| 71.70 | 81-554-8-4,70 | 15 | 5 | 80 | Upper miocene | FORAM NANNO OOZE M CLAY 10 | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 70 | 20 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |