Citation:

PANGAEA.231084

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

Beckmann, Jean-Pierre; Haq, Bilal U; Lipps, J; Moore, Ted; von der Borch, Christopher C; Galehouse, J S; Nesteroff, Wladimir D; Sutton, George H; Tracey, J I J (1971): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, VIII, 1037 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.8.1971

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: -12.516700 * Longitude: -134.266700

Date/Time Start: 1969-11-24T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1969-11-24T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.89 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 81.40 m

Event(s):

8-75 * Latitude: -12.516700 * Longitude: -134.266700 * Date/Time: 1969-11-24T00:00:00 * Elevation: -4181.0 m * Penetration: 82.1 m * Recovery: 68.4 m * Location: South Pacific/CONT RISE * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 10 cores; 81.1 m cored; 0 m drilled; 84.3 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Zeolite	Zeo	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Iron	Fe	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

612 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Nannos [%]	10 Foram [%]	11 Zeo [%]	12 Fe [%]	13 Volc glass [%]
0.89	8-75-1-1,89	35	85	Pleistocene	BROWN CLAY ZEOL	Minor lithology; relative abundance	55	2	55	0	0
0.95	8-75-1-1,95	35	85	Pleistocene	RED CLAY ZEOL	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	23	1	55	0	0
1.10	8-75-1-11,110	35	85	Lower miocene	RED CLAY ZEOL	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	1	55	0	0
2.50	8-75-1-21,100	60	85	Lower miocene	RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	0	0	0
3.10	8-75-1-3,10	35	60	Lower miocene	RED CLAY	Minor lithology; relative abundance	55	0	55	0	0
4.00	8-75-1-31,100	35	85	Lower miocene	NANNO OOZE ZEOL	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	55	0	0
5.70	8-75-1-41,120	10	85	Lower miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	2	0	0
7.20	8-75-1-51,120	10	85	Lower miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	6	0	0
9.90	8-75-2-1,90	10	85	Lower miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	2	0	0
11.60	8-75-2-21,110	10	85	Lower miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	1	0	0	0
12.50	8-75-2-3,50	10	85	Lower miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	0	0	0
13.00	8-75-2-31,100	10	85	Lower miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	0	0	0
14.40	8-75-2-4,90	10	85	Lower miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	0	0	0
15.90	8-75-2-5,90	10	85	Lower miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	0	0	0
19.10	8-75-3-11,110	10	85	Lower miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	0	0	0
20.60	8-75-3-21,110	10	85	Lower miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	2	0	0
21.65	8-75-3-3,65	10	85	Lower miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	0	0	0
21.90	8-75-3-3,90	10	85	Lower miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	0	0	0
24.75	8-75-3-5,75	10	85	Lower miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	0	0	0
26.20	8-75-3-6,70	10	85	Lower miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	0	0	0
27.70	8-75-4-1,70	10	85	Lower miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	6	0	0
29.30	8-75-4-2,80	10	85	Lower miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	2	0	0
30.90	8-75-4-3,90	10	85	Lower miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	2	0	0
32.10	8-75-4-4,60	10	85	Lower miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	0	0	0
33.75	8-75-4-5,75	10	85	Lower miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	0	0	0
35.00	8-75-4-6,50	10	85	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	2	0	0
36.85	8-75-5-1,85	10	85	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	2	0	0
38.15	8-75-5-2,65	10	85	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	2	0	0
39.90	8-75-5-3,90	10	85	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	2	0	0
41.30	8-75-5-4,80	10	85	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	2	0	0
42.75	8-75-5-5,75	10	85	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	2	0	0
44.30	8-75-5-6,80	10	85	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	1	0	0
55.80	8-75-7-1,80	10	85	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	2	0	2	0
57.60	8-75-7-21,110	10	85	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	0	0	0
58.50	8-75-7-3,50	10	85	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	0	0	2
60.40	8-75-7-4,90	10	85	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	0	0	0
64.15	8-75-8-1,15	10	85	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	0	0	0
64.65	8-75-8-1,65	10	85	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	0	0	0
68.10	8-75-8-31,110	10	85	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	0	0	0
69.25	8-75-8-4,75	10	85	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	0	0	0
70.80	8-75-8-5,80	10	85	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	2	0	0	0
72.15	8-75-8-6,65	10	85	Lower oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	1	0	0
73.87	8-75-9-1,87	10	85	Lower oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	2	0	0	2
74.10	8-75-9-11,110	10	85	Lower oligocene	NANNO OOZE,CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	2	0	0	0
75.40	8-75-9-2,90	10	85	Lower oligocene	RED CLAY,NANNO	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	1	0	0	0
76.55	8-75-9-3,55	10	85	Lower oligocene	NANNO OOZE,CLAY	Minor lithology; relative abundance	75	6	0	0	0
76.90	8-75-9-3,90	10	85	Lower oligocene	RED CLAY,NANNO	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	6	0	0	0
78.50	8-75-9-41,100	10	85	Lower oligocene	RED CLAY,NANNO	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	1	0	0	0
79.90	8-75-9-5,90	10	85	Lower oligocene	RED CLAY CALCAREOUS	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	1	0	0	0
80.90	8-75-9-6,40	10	85	Lower oligocene	RED CLAY,NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	55	1	0	0	0
81.40	8-75-9-6,90	10	85	Lower oligocene	RED CLAY,NANNO	relative abundance	55	1	0	0	0