Citation:

PANGAEA.231080

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

Beckmann, Jean-Pierre; Haq, Bilal U; Lipps, J; Moore, Ted; von der Borch, Christopher C; Galehouse, J S; Nesteroff, Wladimir D; Sutton, George H; Tracey, J I J (1971): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, VIII, 1037 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.8.1971

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 0.441500 * Longitude: -138.867000

Date/Time Start: 1969-11-12T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1969-11-12T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.00 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 347.70 m

Event(s):

8-72 * Latitude: 0.441500 * Longitude: -138.867000 * Date/Time: 1969-11-12T00:00:00 * Elevation: -4326.0 m * Penetration: 345 m * Recovery: 84.8 m * Location: North Pacific/PLAIN * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 11 cores; 87 m cored; 0 m drilled; 97.5 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

717 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Nannos [%]	10 Foram [%]	11 Rad [%]	12 Diatoms [%]	13 Spiculae [%]
0.00	8-72-1-0,0	60	60	Pleistocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	35	15	35	15	0
0.05	8-72-1-0,5	60	60	Pleistocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	6	55	23	0
0.25	8-72-1-1,0	60	60	Pleistocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	23	6	6
2.25	8-72-1-2,50	60	60	Pleistocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	23	6	6
3.98	8-72-1-3,73	60	60	Pleistocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	23	6	6
6.95	8-72-1-5,70	60	60	Pleistocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	23	6	6
8.45	8-72-1-6,70	60	60	Pleistocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	23	6	6
61.50	8-72-2-2,0	60	60	Upper miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	23	6	6
64.10	8-72-2-31,110	60	60	Upper miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	23	6	6
64.70	8-72-2-4,20	60	60	Upper miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	50	15	15	15	4
66.70	8-72-2-5,70	60	60	Upper miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	6	23	6	6
107.20	8-72-3-11,120	60	60	Upper miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	23	6	0
108.50	8-72-3-21,100	60	60	Upper miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	23	6	0
109.80	8-72-3-3,80	60	60	Upper miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	55	6	0
111.40	8-72-3-4,90	60	60	Upper miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	23	6	0
112.89	8-72-3-5,89	60	60	Upper miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	23	6	0
114.40	8-72-3-6,90	60	60	Middle miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	53	0	39	4	4
150.90	8-72-4-1,90	60	60	Middle miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	23	6	0
151.00	8-72-4-11,100	60	60	Middle miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	23	6	0
152.30	8-72-4-2,80	60	60	Middle miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	6	6	0
153.80	8-72-4-3,80	60	60	Middle miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	23	23	6	0
156.80	8-72-4-5,80	60	60	Middle miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	23	6	0
158.50	8-72-4-61,100	60	60	Middle miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	23	6	0
211.70	8-72-5-1,70	60	60	Lower miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	6	6	0
213.20	8-72-5-2,70	60	60	Lower miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	6	6	0
214.75	8-72-5-3,75	60	60	Lower miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	23	23	6	0
216.40	8-72-5-4,90	60	60	Lower miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	23	23	6	0
217.60	8-72-5-5,60	60	60	Lower miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	23	23	6	0
219.40	8-72-5-6,90	60	60	Lower miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	23	6	0
266.86	8-72-6-1,86	60	60	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	6	0	0
268.25	8-72-6-2,75	60	60	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	23	0	6
269.95	8-72-6-3,95	60	60	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	23	0	0
271.50	8-72-6-41,100	60	60	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	1	0	6	0	0
272.60	8-72-6-5,60	60	60	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	23	0	0
274.45	8-72-6-6,95	60	60	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	23	0	6
312.70	8-72-7-1,70	60	60	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	15	15	0	0
314.30	8-72-7-2,80	60	60	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	23	6	0	0
315.60	8-72-7-3,60	60	60	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	15	6	0	0
317.30	8-72-7-4,80	0	0	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	23	6	0	0
317.34	8-72-7-4,84	60	60	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	23	6	0	0
318.54	8-72-7-5,54	60	60	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	23	6	0	0
319.85	8-72-7-6,35	60	60	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	23	6	0	0
319.86	8-72-7-6,36	60	60	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	23	6	0	0
323.25	8-72-8-2,75	60	60	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	23	6	0	0
327.49	8-72-8-5,49	60	60	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	55	6	0	0
329.25	8-72-8-6,75	60	60	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	6	0	0
332.80	8-72-9-21,130	60	60	Lower oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	55	0	6	0
333.90	8-72-9-3,90	60	60	Lower oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	55	6	0	0
335.80	8-72-9-41,130	60	60	Lower oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	15	6	0	2
336.90	8-72-9-5,90	60	60	Lower oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	6	0	0
338.40	8-72-9-6,90	60	60	Lower oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	23	0	0
342.00	8-72-11-1,0	60	60	Upper eocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	0	0	0
342.05	8-72-10-3,5	60	60	Upper eocene	NANNO RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	55	0	0
342.40	8-72-11-1,40	60	60	Upper eocene	NANNO RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	55	0	0
342.42	8-72-11-1,42	60	60	Upper eocene	NANNO RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	55	0	6
342.70	8-72-11-1,70	60	60	Upper eocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	0	0	0
343.43	8-72-11-11,143	60	60	Upper eocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	2	0	0
346.20	8-72-10-51,120	60	60		NANNO RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	55	0	0
347.20	8-72-10-6,70	60	60		NANNO RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	75	0	0
347.70	8-72-10-61,120	60	60		NANNO RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	75	0	0