Citation:

PANGAEA.231077

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

Beckmann, Jean-Pierre; Haq, Bilal U; Lipps, J; Moore, Ted; von der Borch, Christopher C; Galehouse, J S; Nesteroff, Wladimir D; Sutton, George H; Tracey, J I J (1971): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, VIII, 1037 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.8.1971

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 6.334700 * Longitude: -140.362000

Date/Time Start: 1969-10-23T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1969-10-23T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.34 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 110.65 m

Event(s):

8-70 * Latitude: 6.334700 * Longitude: -140.362000 * Date/Time: 1969-10-23T00:00:00 * Elevation: -5059.0 m * Penetration: 113 m * Recovery: 98 m * Location: North Pacific/BASIN * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 12 cores; 108 m cored; 0 m drilled; 90.7 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Iron	Fe	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

1204 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Nannos [%]	10 Foram [%]	11 Rad [%]	12 Diatoms [%]	13 Spiculae [%]	14 Fe [%]	15 Volc glass [%]
0.34	8-70-1-1,34	60	60	35	Pleistocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	75	6	0	0	0
1.71	8-70-1-2,21	60	60	10	Pleistocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	75	6	6	0	0
2.30	8-70-1-2,80	60	60	10	Pleistocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	75	23	0	0	0
3.75	8-70-1-3,75	60	60	10	Pliocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	75	6	0	0	0
5.30	8-70-1-4,80	60	60	10	Pliocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	75	6	0	0	0
6.75	8-70-1-5,75	60	60	10	Pliocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	75	6	0	0	0
8.25	8-70-1-6,75	60	60	10	Upper miocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	75	23	0	6	0
9.45	8-70-2-1,45	60	60	10	Upper miocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	75	6	0	0	0
10.05	8-70-2-11,105	60	60	10	Upper miocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	6	0	75	6	0	0	0
11.50	8-70-2-21,100	60	60	10	Upper miocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	6	0	75	6	0	0	0
12.10	8-70-2-CC,0	60	60	10	Upper miocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	75	6	0	6	0
17.75	8-70-3-1,75	35	60	10	Upper miocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	75	6	0	6	0
19.50	8-70-3-21,100	60	60	10	Upper miocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	75	6	0	6	0
19.95	8-70-3-21,145	10	60	60	Upper miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	23	6	0	0	0
20.03	8-70-3-3,3	10	60	60	Middle miocene	NANNO CHALK OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	6	6	0	0	0
20.35	8-70-3-3,35	60	60	10	Middle miocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	6	0	75	6	0	6	0
21.10	8-70-3-31,110	60	60	60	Middle miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	55	6	0	0	0
22.25	8-70-3-4,75	10	60	60	Middle miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	55	6	0	0	0
22.95	8-70-3-41,145	35	60	60	Middle miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	53	4	39	4	0	0	0
23.30	8-70-3-5,30	35	60	60	Middle miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	23	6	0	0	0
23.45	8-70-3-5,45	60	60	60	Middle miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	55	6	0	0	0
24.20	8-70-3-51,120	35	60	60	Middle miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	23	6	0	0	0
24.46	8-70-3-51,146	60	60	35	Middle miocene	NANNO RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	75	6	0	0	0
25.25	8-70-3-6,75	60	60	60	Middle miocene	NANNO RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	39	0	53	4	4	0	0
25.95	8-70-3-61,145	60	60	60	Middle miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	53	0	39	4	4	0	0
26.20	8-70-4-1,20	35	60	60	Middle miocene	NANNO CHALK OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	23	6	0	0	0
26.60	8-70-4-1,60	60	60	10	Middle miocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	23	0	75	6	6	0	0
27.25	8-70-4-11,125	60	60	60	Middle miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	53	0	39	4	4	0	0
28.58	8-70-4-21,108	60	60	60	Middle miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	55	6	6	0	0
29.43	8-70-4-3,43	60	60	60	Middle miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	51	4	37	4	4	0	0
31.25	8-70-4-4,75	60	60	60	Middle miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	53	0	39	4	4	0	0
32.53	8-70-4-5,53	60	60	60	Middle miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	55	0	6	0	0
32.93	8-70-4-5,93	60	60	10	Middle miocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	6	0	75	23	6	0	0
35.40	8-70-5-1,40	60	60	60	Middle miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	55	6	0	0	0
35.85	8-70-5-1,85	60	60	60	Middle miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	53	0	39	4	4	0	0
37.10	8-70-5-2,60	60	60	60	Middle miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	55	6	0	0	0
39.00	8-70-5-31,100	60	60	60	Middle miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	55	6	0	6	0
39.28	8-70-5-31,128	60	60	10	Middle miocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	6	0	75	2	0	0	0
39.70	8-70-5-4,20	60	60	60	Middle miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	51	0	37	4	4	4	0
40.55	8-70-5-41,105	60	60	10	Lower miocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	75	6	0	6	0
41.75	8-70-5-5,75	60	60	10	Lower miocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	6	0	75	6	0	6	0
42.65	8-70-5-6,15	60	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	51	0	37	4	4	4	0
43.15	8-70-5-6,65	60	60	10	Lower miocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	6	0	75	6	0	6	0
44.40	8-70-6-1,40	60	60	10	Lower miocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	23	0	75	6	6	6	0
45.25	8-70-6-11,125	60	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	55	6	0	0	0
45.70	8-70-6-2,20	60	60	35	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	55	6	0	0	0
46.10	8-70-6-2,60	60	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	53	0	39	4	0	4	0
47.25	8-70-6-3,25	60	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	51	0	37	4	4	4	0
48.40	8-70-6-31,140	60	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	55	6	0	0	0
49.75	8-70-6-41,125	60	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	53	0	39	4	0	4	0
50.65	8-70-6-5,65	60	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	51	0	37	4	4	4	0
51.20	8-70-6-51,120	60	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	53	0	39	4	0	4	0
52.40	8-70-6-6,90	60	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	23	0	6	0	0
53.75	8-70-7-1,75	60	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	55	0	0	6	0
55.25	8-70-7-2,75	60	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	51	4	37	0	4	4	0
55.85	8-70-7-21,135	60	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	55	6	6	6	0
56.85	8-70-7-3,85	60	60	60	Lower miocene	NANNO RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	55	6	0	0	0
57.86	8-70-7-4,36	60	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	49	4	36	4	0	4	6
58.55	8-70-7-41,105	60	60	60	Lower miocene	NANNO RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	55	6	0	6	0
60.05	8-70-7-51,105	60	60	60	Lower miocene	NANNO RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	55	6	6	6	0
60.31	8-70-7-51,131	60	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	55	0	6	0	0
61.10	8-70-7-6,60	60	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	53	4	39	0	0	4	0
62.10	8-70-8-1,10	60	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	55	0	0	6	0
62.17	8-70-8-1,17	10	60	60	Lower miocene	NANNO CHALK OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	6	0	0	0	0
64.25	8-70-8-2,75	60	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	55	0	0	0	0
65.75	8-70-8-3,75	60	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	53	4	39	0	4	0	0
66.75	8-70-8-4,25	35	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	55	0	0	0	0
67.80	8-70-8-41,130	60	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	51	4	37	4	4	0	0
68.80	8-70-8-5,80	60	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	53	4	39	4	0	0	0
70.30	8-70-8-6,80	60	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	51	4	37	4	4	0	0
78.41	8-70-9-5,41	60	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	55	6	6	0	0
78.95	8-70-9-5,95	60	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	53	4	39	4	0	0	0
80.25	8-70-9-6,75	35	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	51	0	37	4	4	4	0
81.50	8-70-10-1,50	60	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	23	0	0	0	0
84.90	8-70-10-3,90	35	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	23	0	6	6	0
86.60	8-70-10-41,110	35	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	23	6	6	0	0
87.80	8-70-10-5,80	60	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	55	0	6	0	0
89.25	8-70-10-6,75	60	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	53	0	39	4	4	0	0
101.80	8-70-11-5,80	10	60	60	Lower miocene	NANNO CHALK OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	6	0	6	6	0
103.25	8-70-11-6,75	10	60	60	Lower miocene	NANNO CHALK OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	6	0	0	6	0
106.00	8-70-12-2,50	35	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	23	6	0	0	0
108.30	8-70-12-31,130	60	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	53	0	39	4	4	0	0
109.30	8-70-12-4,80	10	60	60	Lower miocene	NANNO CHALK OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	6	6	6	0	0	0
109.80	8-70-12-41,130	60	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	55	6	6	6	0
110.40	8-70-12-5,40	60	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	53	0	39	0	4	4	0
110.65	8-70-12-5,65	60	60	60	Lower miocene	RAD NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	55	6	0	0	6