/* DATA DESCRIPTION: Citation: Tracey, J I J; Sutton, George H (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 8-69A. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.231076 Related to: Beckmann, Jean-Pierre; Haq, Bilal U; Lipps, J; Moore, Ted; von der Borch, Christopher C; Galehouse, J S; Nesteroff, Wladimir D; Sutton, George H; Tracey, J I J (1971): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, VIII, 1037 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.8.1971 DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM Further details: Processed smear slide data base - background and methods (URI: hdl:10013/epic.32353.d001) Project(s): Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) (URI: http://www.deepseadrilling.org/) Coverage: LATITUDE: 6.000000 * LONGITUDE: -152.865500 DATE/TIME START: 1969-10-17T00:00:00 * DATE/TIME END: 1969-10-17T00:00:00 MINIMUM DEPTH, sediment/rock: 61.70 m * MAXIMUM DEPTH, sediment/rock: 223.18 m Event(s): 8-69A * LATITUDE: 6.000000 * LONGITUDE: -152.865500 * DATE/TIME: 1969-10-17T00:00:00 * ELEVATION: -4978.0 m * Penetration: 229 m * Recovery: 92.2 m * LOCATION: North Pacific/BASIN * CAMPAIGN: Leg8 (URI: https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.8.1971) * BASIS: Glomar Challenger (URI: http://www-odp.tamu.edu/glomar.html) * METHOD/DEVICE: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * COMMENT: 12 cores; 106 m cored; 0 m drilled; 87 % recovery Parameter(s): DEPTH, sediment/rock [m] (Depth sed) * GEOCODE Sample code/label (Sample label) * METHOD/DEVICE: DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation (URI: hdl:10013/epic.27914.d001) Sand [%] (Sand) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Silt [%] (Silt) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay [%] (<2 µm) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Stratigraphy (Stratigraphy) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Lithology/composition/facies (Lithology) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Comment (Comment) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Nannofossils [%] (Nannos) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Radiolarians [%] (Rad) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Diatoms [%] (Diatoms) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Spiculae [%] (Spiculae) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0) (URI: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) Size: 484 data points */ Depth sed [m] Sample label Sand [%] Silt [%] <2 µm [%] Stratigraphy Lithology Comment Nannos [%] Rad [%] Diatoms [%] Spiculae [%] 61.70 8-69A-1-1,70 60 60 0 Upper oligocene NANNO-RAD OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 49 36 0 15 63.19 8-69A-1-2,69 60 60 0 Upper oligocene NANNO-RAD OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 55 55 0 23 63.74 8-69A-1-21,124 60 60 0 Upper oligocene NANNO-RAD OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 49 36 0 15 65.04 8-69A-1-31,104 0 35 60 Upper oligocene NANNO-RAD OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 75 55 0 0 67.75 8-69A-1-5,75 60 60 0 Upper oligocene NANNO-RAD OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 55 55 0 0 70.29 8-69A-2-1,29 60 60 0 Upper oligocene RAD-NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 55 55 0 0 70.87 8-69A-2-1,87 60 60 0 Upper oligocene NANNO OOZE WITH RQDS Dominat lithology; relative abundance 55 23 0 0 72.50 8-69A-2-21,100 0 60 60 Upper oligocene NANNO OOZE WITH RADS Dominat lithology; relative abundance 75 55 0 0 75.20 8-69A-2-4,70 0 60 60 Upper oligocene NANNO-RAD OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 55 55 6 0 79.60 8-69A-3-1,60 0 60 60 Upper oligocene NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 75 6 0 0 84.50 8-69A-3-41,100 0 60 60 Upper oligocene NANNO-RAD OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 75 55 6 0 85.70 8-69A-3-5,70 60 60 0 Upper oligocene NANNO-RAD OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 55 55 0 23 85.95 8-69A-3-5,95 60 60 0 Upper oligocene NANNO-RAD OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 49 36 0 15 88.90 8-69A-4-1,90 35 85 0 Upper oligocene NANNO-CHALK OOZE WITH SILICEOUS FOSSILS Dominat lithology; relative abundance 75 23 0 23 90.65 8-69A-4-21,115 35 85 0 Upper oligocene NANNO CHALK OOZE WITH RADS Dominat lithology; relative abundance 75 23 0 6 94.80 8-69A-4-5,80 35 85 0 Upper oligocene NANNO OOZE WITH SILICEOUS FOSSILS Dominat lithology; relative abundance 75 23 0 6 96.20 8-69A-4-6,70 35 85 0 Upper oligocene NANNO CHALK OOZE WITH SILICEOUS FOSSILS Dominat lithology; relative abundance 75 23 0 6 98.70 8-69A-5-1,70 35 85 0 Upper oligocene NANNO CHALK OOZE WITH SILICEOUS FOSSILS Dominat lithology; relative abundance 75 23 0 6 100.20 8-69A-5-2,70 35 85 0 Upper oligocene NANNO OOZE WITH SILICEOUS FOSSILS Dominat lithology; relative abundance 75 23 0 6 101.70 8-69A-5-3,70 35 60 0 Upper oligocene NANNO CHALK OOZE WITH SILICEOUS FOSSILS Dominat lithology; relative abundance 75 23 0 6 103.20 8-69A-5-4,70 35 85 0 Upper oligocene NANNO CHALK OOZE WITH SILICEOUS FOSSILS Dominat lithology; relative abundance 75 23 0 6 106.20 8-69A-5-6,70 35 85 0 Upper oligocene NANNO CHALK OOZE WITH RARE SILICEOUS FOSSILS Dominat lithology; relative abundance 75 6 0 6 107.70 8-69A-6-1,70 35 60 0 Upper oligocene NANNO CHALK OOZE WITH SILICEOUS FOSSILS Dominat lithology; relative abundance 75 23 0 6 108.85 8-69A-6-2,35 35 60 0 Upper oligocene NANNO OOZE WITH RADS Dominat lithology; relative abundance 55 23 0 0 111.05 8-69A-6-31,105 35 60 0 Upper oligocene NANNO OOZE WITH RADS Dominat lithology; relative abundance 75 23 0 0 115.17 8-69A-6-6,67 60 60 0 Upper oligocene NANNO CHALK OOZE WITH RADS Dominat lithology; relative abundance 75 23 0 23 115.20 8-69A-6-6,70 35 60 0 Upper oligocene NANNO OOZE WITH SILICEOUS FOSSILS Dominat lithology; relative abundance 75 23 0 6 135.95 8-69A-8-1,95 60 60 0 Lower oligocene RAD NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 75 55 0 0 137.05 8-69A-8-2,55 60 60 0 Lower oligocene RAD NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 75 55 0 0 139.20 8-69A-8-31,120 60 60 0 Lower oligocene NANNO RAD OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 55 75 0 0 140.25 8-69A-8-4,75 60 60 0 Lower oligocene NANNO RAD OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 55 55 0 0 142.12 8-69A-8-51,112 60 60 0 Lower oligocene NANNO RAD OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 55 55 0 0 142.65 8-69A-8-6,15 60 60 0 Lower oligocene NANNO RAD OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 55 55 0 0 143.85 8-69A-8-61,135 60 60 0 Lower oligocene RAD NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 55 55 0 0 144.85 8-69A-9-1,85 60 60 0 Upper eocene RAD OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 55 0 0 149.60 8-69A-9-41,110 60 60 0 Upper eocene RAD OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 75 0 0 150.21 8-69A-9-5,21 60 60 0 Upper eocene RAD OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 6 55 0 0 157.06 8-69A-10-31,106 85 35 0 Upper eocene RAD OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 75 0 23 161.20 8-69A-10-6,70 85 35 0 Upper eocene RAD OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 75 0 0 214.60 8-69A-11-1,60 85 35 0 Middle eocene RAD OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 75 0 0 214.70 8-69A-11-1,70 85 35 0 Middle eocene RAD OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 75 0 0 220.70 8-69A-11-5,70 85 35 0 Middle eocene RAD OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 75 0 0 222.10 8-69A-11-6,60 85 35 0 Middle eocene RAD OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 75 0 0 223.18 8-69A-12-1,18 60 60 0 Middle eocene NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 75 23 0 0