Citation:

PANGAEA.231075

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

Beckmann, Jean-Pierre; Haq, Bilal U; Lipps, J; Moore, Ted; von der Borch, Christopher C; Galehouse, J S; Nesteroff, Wladimir D; Sutton, George H; Tracey, J I J (1971): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, VIII, 1037 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.8.1971

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 6.000000 * Longitude: -152.865500

Date/Time Start: 1969-10-17T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1969-10-17T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.20 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 195.95 m

Event(s):

8-69 * Latitude: 6.000000 * Longitude: -152.865500 * Date/Time: 1969-10-17T00:00:00 * Elevation: -4978.0 m * Penetration: 231 m * Recovery: 45.5 m * Location: North Pacific/BASIN * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 7 cores; 49 m cored; 0 m drilled; 92.9 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Minerals, other	Min other	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

370 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Nannos [%]	10 Foram [%]	11 Rad [%]	12 Spiculae [%]	13 Min other [%]
0.20	8-69-1-1,20	60	60	0		RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	6	0	55	23	0
0.50	8-69-1-1,50	35	60	0		NANNO-RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	55	0	0
14.75	8-69-2-1,75	10	35	60	Middle miocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	75	0	0
16.40	8-69-2-2,90	60	35	0	Middle miocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	55	23	0
16.78	8-69-2-21,128	35	35	0	Middle miocene	RAD-NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	55	23	0
19.65	8-69-2-41,115	60	60	0	Middle miocene	RAD-NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	55	0	0
20.40	8-69-2-5,40	60	60	0	Middle miocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	6	0	55	0	0
20.81	8-69-2-5,81	60	60	0	Middle miocene	NANNO-RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	55	0	0
22.14	8-69-2-6,64	60	60	0	Middle miocene	NANNO-RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	55	23	0
23.64	8-69-3-1,64	60	60	0	Middle miocene	RAD-NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	55	23	0
23.66	8-69-3-1,66	60	60	0	Middle miocene	RAD-NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	55	23	0
23.71	8-69-3-1,71	60	60	0	Middle miocene	RAD-NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	55	23	0
26.85	8-69-3-3,85	85	35	0	Middle miocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	75	23	0
28.40	8-69-3-4,90	85	60	0	Lower miocene	RAD-NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	6	0	75	55	0
28.83	8-69-3-41,133	85	10	0	Lower miocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	75	6	0
30.08	8-69-3-51,108	60	60	0	Lower miocene	NANNO-RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	55	23	0
52.44	8-69-4-1,44	35	60	0	Upper oligocene	NANNO-RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	75	0	23	0	0
54.40	8-69-4-2,90	60	60	0	Upper oligocene	NANNO-RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	55	23	0
55.70	8-69-4-3,70	60	60	0	Upper oligocene	NANNO-RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	55	23	0
58.70	8-69-4-5,70	60	60	0	Upper oligocene	NANNO-RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	55	23	6
58.90	8-69-4-5,90	60	60	0	Upper oligocene	NANNO RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	55	0	0
117.75	8-69-5-1,75	60	60	0	Upper oligocene	NANNO RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	49	0	36	15	0
118.04	8-69-5-11,104	60	60	0	Upper oligocene	RAD-NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	55	23	0
120.90	8-69-5-3,90	60	60	0	Upper oligocene	NANNO-RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	49	0	36	15	0
121.00	8-69-5-31,100	60	60	0	Upper oligocene	NANNO-RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	55	55	23	0
122.41	8-69-5-4,91	60	60	0	Upper oligocene	NANNO-RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	55	23	0
125.15	8-69-5-6,65	60	60	0	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE WITH RADIOLARIA	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	23	0	0
187.80	8-69-6-1,80	60	60	0	Middle eocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	55	0	0
190.80	8-69-6-3,80	60	60	0	Middle eocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	55	0	0
193.75	8-69-6-5,75	60	60	0	Middle eocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	55	0	0
195.95	8-69-6-61,145	60	60	0	Middle eocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	55	0	0