Citation:

PANGAEA.231065

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Wright, Audrey; Wilson, Douglas S; Tardy, M; Renz, G W; Pudsey, Carol J; Marlow, Michael S; Hemleben, Christoph; Guerra, Rodolfo T; Davis, D; Cowan, Darrel S; Claypool, George E; Blackinton, Grant; Bergen, James A; Natland, James H; Biju-Duval, Bernard; Moore, John C (1984): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, LXXVIII A, 848 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.78a.1984

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 15.712300 * Longitude: -58.653700

Date/Time Start: 1981-02-28T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1981-02-28T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.90 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 421.65 m

Event(s):

78-543A * Latitude: 15.712300 * Longitude: -58.653700 * Date/Time: 1981-02-28T00:00:00 * Elevation: -5633.0 m * Penetration: 455 m * Recovery: 64.2 m * Location: North Atlantic/CONT RISE * Campaign: (Leg78AB) * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 16 cores; 132.5 m cored; 0 m drilled; 48.5 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

218 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Nannos [%]	10 Foram [%]	11 Rad [%]
0.90	78-543A-1-1,90	2	3	95	Quaternary	CLAY M FEL 2,HVY.MINS TR/N ZIRCON,CLAY 95, VOLC.GLAS 3/N ALTERED	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	2
2.85	78-543A-1-21,135	40	55	5	Quaternary	GREY CRYSTAL VITRIC ASH M FEL 40,CLAY 5,OP 2,VOLC.GLAS 40/N FRESH CONTAI	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0
4.80	78-543A-1-4,30	3	25	72	Quaternary	MANGANIFEROUS CLAY M FEL 1,HVY.MINS TR,CLAY 72,VOLC.GLAS 2/N VERY ALTERE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	0	2
332.50	78-543A-2-1,50	0	10	90	Lower eocene	ZEOLITIC CLAYSTONE M QTZ 1,FEL 5,HVY.MINS TR,CLAY 84,VOLC.GLAS TR, ZEOL	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0
334.41	78-543A-2-CC,19	0	10	90	Lower eocene	ZEOLITIC CLAYSTONE M QTZ 1,FEL 6,HVY.MINS TR,CLAY 84,VOLC.GLAS 1, ZEOL 8	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0
341.75	78-543A-3-1,25	0	8	92	Lower eocene	ZEOLITIC CLAYSTONE M QTZ 1,FEL 6/N ALTERED,CLAY 84,VOLC.GLAS 1, ZEOL 8	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0
342.33	78-543A-3-1,83	0	10	90	Lower eocene	ZEOLITIC MUDSTONE M QTZ 1,FEL 5/N ALTERED,HVY.MINS TR,CLAY 84, VOLC.GLAS	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0
343.90	78-543A-3-2,90	0	15	85	Lower eocene	MUDDY CLAYSTONE M QTZ 1,FEL 6/N ALTERED,CLAY 88,VOLC.GLAS TR, ZEOL 5	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0
351.62	78-543A-4-1,62	0	8	92	Lower eocene	CLAYSTONE M QTZ TR,FEL 5/N ALTERED,HVY.MINS 1,CLAY 87, VOLC.GLAS 5,ZEOL	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0
353.20	78-543A-4-2,70	1	7	92	Lower eocene	CLAYSTONE M QTZ TR,FEL 6,CLAY 92,VOLC.GLAS 2,ZEOL TR	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0
354.75	78-543A-4-3,75	1	5	94	Lower eocene	CLAYSTONE M QTZ TR,FEL 6/N ALTERED,CLAY 90,VOLC.GLAS 4, ZEOL TR	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0
361.30	78-543A-5-1,80	0	5	95	Lower eocene	CLAYSTONE M QTZ TR,FEL 4,HVY.MINS TR,CLAY 94,VOLC.GLAS 2	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0
364.20	78-543A-5-3,70	0	8	92	Lower eocene	CLAYSTONE M QTZ TR,FEL 4,HVY.MINS TR,CLAY 94,VOLC.GLAS 2	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0
364.71	78-543A-5-CC,0	0	5	95	Lower eocene	CLAYSTONE M QTZ TR,FEL 5/N ALTERED,CLAY 93,VOLC.GLAS 2	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0
370.80	78-543A-6-1,80	0	9	91		CLAYSTONE M QTZ 2,FEL 5/N ALTERED,HVY.MINS 1,CLAY 89, VOLC.GLAS 3	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	0	0
380.45	78-543A-7-1,95	0	5	95	Upper cretaceous	FERRUGINOUS CLAY M FEL 5,CLAY 95	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0
380.57	78-543A-7-11,107	0	6	94	Upper cretaceous	RED-BROWN FERRUGINOUS CLAY M FEL 6/N ALTERED,HVY.MINS TR,CLAY 94	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0
382.55	78-543A-7-3,5	0	0	100	Upper cretaceous	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE M CLAY 15	Minor lithology; relative abundance	85	2	0
389.84	78-543A-8-1,84	0	6	94	Upper cretaceous	RED BROWN FERRUGINOUS MUD M FEL 2,CLAY 94,DOLO 4/N AUTHIGENIC	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0
398.83	78-543A-9-1,33	0	2	98	Campanian	FERRUGINOUS DOLOMITIC CLAY M HVY.MINS TR,CLAY 90,DOLO 8	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	2	0	0
408.23	78-543A-10-1,23	0	8	92	Lower campanian	NANNO MUD M FEL 1,HVY.MINS TR,CLAY 48,DOLO 1	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	50	0	0
421.65	78-543A-12-2,15	0	8	92		CLAYSTONE M QTZ 1,FEL 6/N ALTERED,HVY.MINS TR,CLAY 93, VOLC.GLAS TR	Minor lithology; relative abundance	2	0	0