Citation:

PANGAEA.231062

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Wright, Audrey; Wilson, Douglas S; Tardy, M; Renz, G W; Pudsey, Carol J; Marlow, Michael S; Hemleben, Christoph; Guerra, Rodolfo T; Davis, D; Cowan, Darrel S; Claypool, George E; Blackinton, Grant; Bergen, James A; Natland, James H; Biju-Duval, Bernard; Moore, John C (1984): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, LXXVIII A, 848 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.78a.1984

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 15.517000 * Longitude: -58.713300

Date/Time Start: 1981-02-21T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1981-02-21T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 79.40 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 239.25 m

Event(s):

78-542 * Latitude: 15.517000 * Longitude: -58.713300 * Date/Time: 1981-02-21T00:00:00 * Elevation: -5016.0 m * Penetration: 240 m * Recovery: 35.3 m * Location: North Atlantic/RIDGE * Campaign: (Leg78AB) * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 4 cores; 38 m cored; 0 m drilled; 93 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

207 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Nannos [%]	10 Foram [%]
79.40	78-542-H1-1,90	3	12	85	Lower pleistocene	FORAM-NANNO OOZE M QTZ 2,FEL 5,CLAY 25,VOLC.GLAS 7	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	51	10
79.66	78-542-H1-11,116	3	15	82	Lower pleistocene	FORAM-NANNO OOZE M QTZ 4,FEL 5,CLAY 20,VOLC.GLAS 10	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	53	8
80.60	78-542-H1-2,60	3	17	80	Lower pleistocene	FORAM-NANNO OOZE M QTZ 2,FEL 5,CLAY 20,VOLC.GLAS 15,CARB 5	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	45	8
86.19	78-542-H1-6,19	10	10	80	Lower pleistocene	FORAM-NANNO OOZE M QTZ 2,FEL 5,CLAY 18,VOLC.GLAS 10	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	55	10
88.20	78-542-H2-,20	5	15	80	Upper pliocene	FORAM NANNO MUD M QTZ 3,FEL 5,CLAY 30,VOLC.GLAS 15	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	40	7
88.25	78-542-H2-1,25	0	4	96	Upper pliocene	CLAY M QTZ 2,FEL 3,CLAY 90,VOLC.GLAS 5	Minor lithology; relative abundance	2	0
90.40	78-542-H2-2,90	2	10	88	Upper pliocene	FORAM NANNO MUD M QTZ 3,FEL 8,CLAY 35,VOLC.GLAS 10	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	40	4
92.00	78-542-H2-31,100	5	10	85	Upper pliocene	MUDDY FORAM NANNO OOZE M QTZ 3,FEL 8,CLAY 45,VOLC.GLAS 8	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	30	6
93.20	78-542-H2-4,70	4	8	88	Upper pliocene	MUDDY FORAM NANNO OOZE M QTZ 2,FEL 5,CLAY 38,VOLC.GLAS 15	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	35	5
98.05	78-542-H2-71,105	2	8	90	Upper pliocene	FORAM NANNO MUD M QTZ 4,FEL 8,CLAY 33,VOLC.GLAS 15	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	35	5
154.40	78-542-H3-1,40	0	4	96	Lower pliocene	NANNOFOSSILIFEROUS MUD M CLAY 40,CARB 3	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	56	1
155.40	78-542-H3-11,140	2	98	0	Lower pliocene	CRYSTAL (FEL) VITRIC ASH M FEL 35,HVY.MINS TR,VOLC.GLAS 65/N ALTERED	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	0	0
159.50	78-542-H3-41,100	3	6	91	Lower pliocene	FORAM-RICH NANNO MUD M CLAY 40,CARB 2	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	51	7
202.60	78-542-1-1,60	15	35	50	Lower pliocene	FORAM NANNO MUD M FEL 1,HVY.MINS TR,CLAY 34	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	50	15
205.60	78-542-1-3,60	20	60	20	Lower pliocene	DARK GREY ASH M FEL 10,CLAY 20,FERROMAGS TR/N PYROXENE, VOLC.GLAS 70/N V	Minor lithology; relative abundance	2	0
212.00	78-542-2-1,50	0	6	94	Lower pliocene	NANNO MUD M FEL TR,HVY.MINS TR,CLAY 45,CARB 3	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	49	3
214.96	78-542-2-3,46	0	1	99	Lower pliocene	NANNO MUD OR CLAYEY NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,CLAY 29,CARB 1	Minor lithology; relative abundance	70	2
219.56	78-542-2-6,56	0	3	97	Lower pliocene	CLAY MUD M FEL TR,CLAY 85,CARB 3	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	12	0
224.80	78-542-3-3,80	1	25	74	Upper miocene	NANNO MUD M FEL TR,HVY.MINS TR,CLAY 34	numerical abundance	65	1
226.50	78-542-3-41,100	3	20	77	Upper miocene	NANNO MUD M FEL 1,HVY.MINS TR,CLAY 37	numerical abundance	60	2
232.93	78-542-4-2,93	0	0	100	Upper miocene	NANNOFOSSIL MUD M FEL TR,CLAY 75,CARB TR	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	25	0
234.40	78-542-4-3,90	0	2	98	Upper miocene	CLAY (MUD) M FEL 1,CLAY 93,CARB 1	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	5	0
239.25	78-542-4-61,125	0	25	75	Upper miocene	ASHY MUD M FEL 3,CLAY 75,VOLC.GLAS 21/N HEAVILY ALT,CARB 1	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0