Buffler, Richard T; Schlager, Wolfgang (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 77-536 [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.231054
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Related to:
DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM
Watkins, David K; Tyson, Richard V; Testarmata, Margaret M; Avello Suarez, Otmara; Premoli Silva, Isabella; Patton, J W; McNulty, C L; Magoon, Leslie B; Kinoshita, Hajimu; Halley, Roberet B; Cotillon, Pierre; Bowdler, Jay L; Pisciotto, Kenneth A; Buffler, Richard T; Schlager, Wolfgang (1984): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, LXXVII, 747 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.77.1984
Further details:
Project(s):
Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)
Coverage:
Latitude: 23.489800 * Longitude: -85.209700
Date/Time Start: 1981-01-09T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1981-01-09T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.03 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 78.26 m
Event(s):
77-536 * Latitude: 23.489800 * Longitude: -85.209700 * Date/Time: 1981-01-09T00:00:00 * Elevation: -2790.0 m * Penetration: 213 m * Recovery: 65.3 m * Location: Gulf of Mexico/SLOPE * Campaign: Leg77 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 23 cores; 213 m cored; 0 m drilled; 30.7 % recovery
Parameter(s):
| # | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DEPTH, sediment/rock | Depth sed | m | Geocode | ||
| 2 | Sample code/label | Sample label | DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation | |||
| 3 | Sand | Sand | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 4 | Silt | Silt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 5 | Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay | <2 µm | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 6 | Stratigraphy | Stratigraphy | Smear slide analysis | |||
| 7 | Lithology/composition/facies | Lithology | Smear slide analysis | |||
| 8 | Comment | Comment | Smear slide analysis | |||
| 9 | Carbonates | Carb | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 10 | Dolomite | Dol | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 11 | Nannofossils | Nannos | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 12 | Foraminifera | Foram | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 13 | Pteropoda | Pteropoda | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 14 | Radiolarians | Rad | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 15 | Diatoms | Diatoms | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 16 | Silicoflagellates | Silicoflag | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 17 | Spiculae | Spiculae | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 18 | Iron | Fe | % | Smear slide analysis |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
425 data points
Data
| 1 Depth sed [m] | 2 Sample label | 3 Sand [%] | 4 Silt [%] | 5 <2 µm [%] | 6 Stratigraphy | 7 Lithology | 8 Comment | 9 Carb [%] | 10 Dol [%] | 11 Nannos [%] | 12 Foram [%] | 13 Pteropoda [%] | 14 Rad [%] | 15 Diatoms [%] | 16 Silicoflag [%] | 17 Spiculae [%] | 18 Fe [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.03 | 77-536-1-1,3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pleistocene | FORAM NANNO OOZE M MICA 5,CLAY 10,CARB 10 | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 30 | 30 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 |
| 0.31 | 77-536-1-1,31 | 0 | 30 | 70 | Pleistocene | FORAM NANNO OOZE M CLAY 20,CARB 10 | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 40 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| 2.26 | 77-536-1-2,76 | 0 | 20 | 80 | Pleistocene | FORAM NANNO OOZE M CLAY 10,GLAUC 2/N IN FORAMS | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 70 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 2.98 | 77-536-1-21,148 | 0 | 80 | 20 | Pleistocene | (FORAM) NANNOFOSSIL OOZE M CLAY 10,GLAUC TR/N IN FORAMS,CARB 5 | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 74 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 3.13 | 77-536-1-3,13 | 0 | 10 | 90 | Pleistocene | (FORAM) NANNO OOZE M CLAY 10,CARB 2 | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 80 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| 3.39 | 77-536-1-3,39 | 5 | 15 | 80 | Pleistocene | NANNO OOZE M CLAY 25,CARB 10/N SHELL FRAGS TUNICATES SPIC | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 60 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3.90 | 77-536-1-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pleistocene | NANNOFOSSIL OOZE M QTZ 2,MICA 3,CLAY 15,CARB 10 | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 58 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 5.20 | 77-536-2-11,120 | 10 | 10 | 80 | Upper pleistocene | FORAM NANNO OOZE M CLAY 5,CARB 5 | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 80 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6.10 | 77-536-2-2,60 | 10 | 10 | 80 | Upper pleistocene | FORAM NANNO OOZE M CLAY 10,GLAUC TR/N IN FORAMS,CARB 5 | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 80 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6.70 | 77-536-2-21,120 | 10 | 80 | 10 | Lower pliocene | FORAM NANNO OOZE M CLAY 5,CARB 2 | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 80 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15.50 | 77-536-3-2,50 | 10 | 5 | 85 | Lower pliocene | FORAM NANNO OOZE M CLAY 5,CARB 2 | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 83 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27.10 | 77-536-4-31,110 | 3 | 30 | 67 | Middle miocene | NANNO OOZE M CLAY 10,CARB 3,DOLO TR | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 77 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 33.46 | 77-536-5-1,96 | 2 | 18 | 80 | Middle miocene | M CLAY 5 | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 2 | 87 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 34.96 | 77-536-5-2,96 | 0 | 5 | 95 | Middle miocene | NANNOFOSSIL OOZE M CLAY 2,CARB 5 | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 87 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 42.99 | 77-536-6-1,99 | 1 | 30 | 69 | Middle miocene | GREENISH NANNOFOSSIL CLAY M TOT.DET TR,CLAY 75/N GREEN GLAUCONITIC,VOLC. | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 2 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 43.73 | 77-536-6-2,23 | 2 | 80 | 18 | Middle miocene | NANNO OOZE M QTZ TR,HVY.MINS TR/N GREEN HORNBLENDE,CLAY 15, CARB 1 | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 2 | 83 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 51.91 | 77-536-7-1,41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | DIATOM NANNOFOSSIL OOZE M CLAY 15,PYR 1 | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 58 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 2 | 5 | 0 |
| 52.53 | 77-536-7-11,103 | 1 | 70 | 30 | Lower miocene | PYRITE-RICH FORAM NANNOS OOZE M CLAY 20,VOLC.GLAS TR,PYR 35 | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 30 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| 52.70 | 77-536-7-11,120 | 10 | 70 | 20 | Lower miocene | NANNOFOSSIL OOZE M CLAY 20,VOLC.GLAS TR | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 75 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| 55.20 | 77-536-7-3,70 | 10 | 70 | 20 | Lower miocene | FORAM NANNO OOZE M CLAY 20 | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 60 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| 61.83 | 77-536-8-1,83 | 30 | 70 | 0 | Upper oligocene | GLAUCONITE RICH PATCH IN NANNO OOZE M GLAUC 50 | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 40 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 62.10 | 77-536-8-11,110 | 0 | 95 | 5 | Upper oligocene | NANNOFOSSIL OOZE M CLAY 5 | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 92 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 73.10 | 77-536-9-21,110 | 0 | 95 | 5 | Upper paleocene | NANNOFOSSIL CHALK M CLAY 5 | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 95 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 77.89 | 77-536-9-51,139 | 4 | 11 | 85 | Upper maestrichtian | CALCAREOUS CLAY M QTZ TR,FEL TR,CLAY 85,DOLO 2,CARB 13,TUNICATES TR | relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 78.26 | 77-536-9-6,26 | 7 | 15 | 78 | Upper maestrichtian | CALCAREOUS CLAY M QTZ TR,FEL TR,UNIDENT.MINS 10,GLAUC 50,CARB 5 | relative abundance | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |