/* DATA DESCRIPTION: Citation: Hsü, Kenneth J; LaBrecque, John L (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 73-524A. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.231030 Related to: DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM Weissert, Helmut J; Tucker, Peter; Tauxe, Lisa; Schreiber, Edward; Poore, Richard Z; Pisciotto, Kenneth A; Peterson, Nikolai P; Percival, Stephen F Jr; McKenzie, Judith A; Karpoff, Anne Marie; Gombos, Andrew M; Carman, M F; Hsü, Kenneth J; LaBrecque, John L (1984): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. U.S. Government Printing Office, LXXIII, 798 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.73.1984 Further details: Processed smear slide data base - background and methods (URI: hdl:10013/epic.32353.d001) Project(s): Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) (URI: http://www.deepseadrilling.org/) Coverage: LATITUDE: -29.484200 * LONGITUDE: 3.512300 DATE/TIME START: 1980-05-21T00:00:00 * DATE/TIME END: 1980-05-21T00:00:00 MINIMUM DEPTH, sediment/rock: 28.90 m * MAXIMUM DEPTH, sediment/rock: 40.64 m Event(s): 73-524A * LATITUDE: -29.484200 * LONGITUDE: 3.512300 * DATE/TIME: 1980-05-21T00:00:00 * ELEVATION: -4796.0 m * Penetration: 47.5 m * Recovery: 9.9 m * LOCATION: South Atlantic/CANYON * CAMPAIGN: Leg73 (URI: https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.73.1984) * BASIS: Glomar Challenger (URI: http://www-odp.tamu.edu/glomar.html) * METHOD/DEVICE: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * COMMENT: 2 cores; 19 m cored; 0 m drilled; 51.9 % recovery Parameter(s): DEPTH, sediment/rock [m] (Depth sed) * GEOCODE Sample code/label (Sample label) * METHOD/DEVICE: DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation (URI: hdl:10013/epic.27914.d001) Sand [%] (Sand) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Silt [%] (Silt) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay [%] (<2 µm) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Stratigraphy (Stratigraphy) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Lithology/composition/facies (Lithology) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Comment (Comment) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Carbonates [%] (Carb) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Nannofossils [%] (Nannos) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Foraminifera [%] (Foram) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Spiculae [%] (Spiculae) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Quartz [%] (Qz) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Feldspar [%] (Fsp) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Clay minerals [%] (Clay min) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Heavy minerals [%] (HM) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Volcanic glass [%] (Volc glass) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Palagonite [%] (Palagonite) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0) (URI: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) Size: 51 data points */ Depth sed [m] Sample label Sand [%] Silt [%] <2 µm [%] Stratigraphy Lithology Comment Carb [%] Nannos [%] Foram [%] Spiculae [%] Qz [%] Fsp [%] Clay min [%] HM [%] Volc glass [%] Palagonite [%] 28.90 73-524A-1-1,40 5 90 5 Lower eocene NANNOFOSSIL OOZE relative abundance 5 85 10 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 39.32 73-524A-2-11,132 0 0 0 Paleocene NANNOFOSSIL OOZE relative abundance 10 60 10 2 5 2 5 2 5 5 40.64 73-524A-2-21,114 20 70 10 Paleocene NANNOFOSSIL OOZE relative abundance 15 60 20 0 2 2 5 0 2 0