Citation:

PANGAEA.231023

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Weissert, Helmut J; Tucker, Peter; Tauxe, Lisa; Schreiber, Edward; Poore, Richard Z; Pisciotto, Kenneth A; Peterson, Nikolai P; Percival, Stephen F Jr; McKenzie, Judith A; Karpoff, Anne Marie; Gombos, Andrew M; Carman, M F; Hsü, Kenneth J; LaBrecque, John L (1984): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. U.S. Government Printing Office, LXXIII, 798 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.73.1984

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: -26.073800 * Longitude: -10.264500

Date/Time Start: 1980-05-02T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1980-05-02T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.60 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 82.28 m

Event(s):

73-521 * Latitude: -26.073800 * Longitude: -10.264500 * Date/Time: 1980-05-02T00:00:00 * Elevation: -4125.0 m * Penetration: 84 m * Recovery: 75.2 m * Location: South Atlantic/HILL * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 21 cores; 84 m cored; 0 m drilled; 89.5 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Quartz	Qz	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Pyrite, FeS2	Py	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Iron	Fe	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Heavy minerals	HM	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Palagonite	Palagonite	%	Smear slide analysis
20	Micronodules	Micronod	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

722 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Carb [%]	10 Nannos [%]	11 Foram [%]	12 Spiculae [%]	13 Qz [%]	14 Clay min [%]	15 Py [%]	16 Fe [%]	17 HM [%]	18 Volc glass [%]	19 Palagonite [%]	20 Micronod [%]
0.60	73-521-1-1,60	5	90	5	Quaternary	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	88	5	0	0	5	0	0	0	1	1	0
2.60	73-521-1-21,110	5	95	0	Quaternary	FORAM NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	94	3	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	0
3.60	73-521-2-1,60	5	95	0	Quaternary	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	95	5	0	0	2	0	0	0	3	2	0
8.25	73-521-3-1,75	3	97	0	Quaternary	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	94	3	0	0	2	0	0	0	1	2	0
8.60	73-521-3-11,110	3	97	0	Quaternary	(PYRITE-BEARING) FORAM NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	95	3	0	0	2	2	0	0	2	2	0
8.67	73-521-3-11,117	3	97	0	Quaternary	WHITE FORAM NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	95	3	0	0	2	0	0	0	2	1	0
13.00	73-521-4-11,100	0	90	10	Pliocene	FORAM-NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	10	60	25	0	2	0	0	2	0	3	2	2
18.80	73-521-5-2,80	0	90	10	Upper pliocene	FORAM-NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	10	45	25	0	2	0	0	12	5	3	2	2
19.20	73-521-5-21,120	0	0	0	Upper pliocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	15	70	5	2	2	3	0	4	0	3	2	0
23.98	73-521-6-21,148	10	85	5	Upper pliocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	15	50	20	0	2	5	0	5	0	0	2	5
24.06	73-521-6-3,6	0	80	20	Upper pliocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	15	75	10	0	2	2	0	2	0	0	2	5
24.07	73-521-6-3,7	5	75	20	Upper pliocene	IRON-OXIDES RICH NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	numerical abundance	10	50	10	0	0	5	0	10	0	3	2	10
27.31	73-521-7-2,31	5	75	20	Upper pliocene	NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	25	45	15	0	0	5	0	5	0	2	0	5
28.19	73-521-7-21,119	15	50	35	Upper pliocene	CALCAREOUS MUDSTONE	numerical abundance	15	30	5	0	0	15	0	20	0	0	5	10
31.45	73-521-8-11,145	5	90	5	Upper pliocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	numerical abundance	15	65	10	0	0	5	0	5	0	3	2	5
40.49	73-521-10-11,149	5	85	10	Pliocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	20	45	10	0	2	5	0	10	0	3	2	5
41.04	73-521-10-2,54	10	90	0	Pliocene	NANNOFOSSIL (DISC) OOZE	relative abundance	15	70	5	0	0	2	0	0	0	2	0	10
42.67	73-521-10-3,67	0	95	5	Pliocene	NANNOFOSSIL (DISC) OOZE	relative abundance	15	70	5	0	0	2	0	10	0	2	0	0
44.27	73-521-11-1,77	0	85	15	Lower pliocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	10	75	5	0	2	2	0	10	0	2	0	0
44.41	73-521-11-1,91	5	60	35	Lower pliocene	IRON-RICH CALCAREOUS MUD	relative abundance	10	35	5	0	2	15	0	22	0	5	5	5
44.98	73-521-11-11,148	10	50	40	Lower pliocene	IRON-RICH NANNOFOSSIL MUD	relative abundance	10	35	5	0	2	15	0	22	0	5	0	10
46.28	73-521-11-CC,0	0	0	0	Lower pliocene	IRON-RICH CALCAREOUS MUD	relative abundance	15	35	0	0	2	15	0	27	0	0	0	10
47.02	73-521-12-1,52	3	40	57	Upper miocene	NANNOFOSSIL FE-RICH MUDSTONE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	5	20	3	0	0	50	0	20	0	1	0	1
47.60	73-521-12-11,110	3	40	57	Upper miocene	NANNOFOSSIL FE-RICH MUDSTONE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	3	27	2	0	0	50	0	20	0	2	2	1
49.10	73-521-12-21,110	1	80	14	Upper miocene	IRON-RICH CLAYEY NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	9	2	0	0	14	0	10	0	2	0	1
51.77	73-521-13-1,77	0	95	5	Upper miocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	30	65	2	0	0	5	0	5	0	0	0	0
56.70	73-521-14-11,120	1	95	5	Miocene	CLAYEY NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	20	70	1	0	0	5	2	4	0	0	2	2
58.20	73-521-14-21,120	3	80	17	Miocene	NANNOFOSSIL MUDSTONE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	10	34	1	0	0	35	0	20	0	0	2	2
61.76	73-521-16-1,26	3	67	30	Middle miocene	NANNOFOSSIL MUDSTONE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	10	47	2	0	2	30	0	10	0	2	2	1
64.00	73-521-16-21,100	3	82	15	Middle miocene	MUDDY NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	70	2	0	0	15	0	8	0	2	2	2
66.90	73-521-17-1,90	5	90	5	Middle miocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	85	5	0	0	5	0	5	0	2	0	2
69.09	73-521-17-3,9	3	70	27	Middle miocene	CLAYEY NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	10	58	2	0	0	27	0	5	0	0	2	0
70.96	73-521-18-1,46	45	50	5	Middle miocene	NANO FORAM OOZE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	10	34	40	0	0	5	0	1	0	0	0	1
73.26	73-521-18-21,126	35	60	5	Middle miocene	NANNO FORAM OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	5	60	30	0	0	5	0	1	0	2	0	2
74.20	73-521-18-3,70	10	85	5	Middle miocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	80	10	0	0	5	0	1	0	0	2	0
76.00	73-521-19-11,110	10	85	5	Middle miocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	10	70	10	0	0	5	0	5	0	2	0	0
77.50	73-521-19-21,110	5	90	5	Middle miocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	85	5	0	0	5	0	5	0	0	0	0
82.28	73-521-20-21,148	5	85	10	Middle miocene	CALCAREOUS OOZE	relative abundance	15	50	15	0	2	5	0	10	0	5	0	2