Citation:

PANGAEA.231018

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Walton, William H; Tjalsma, R C; Suzyumov, Alexey E; Shor, A N; Pujol, Claude; de Melo, Ubirajara; Hamilton, Norman; Gamboa, Luiz; Cepek, Pavel; Coulbourn, William T; Barker, Peter F; Carlson, Richard L; Johnson, David A (1983): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, LXXII, 1024 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.72.1983

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: -30.946800 * Longitude: -38.041200

Date/Time Start: 1980-03-30T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1980-03-30T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 1.27 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 51.11 m

Event(s):

72-517 * Latitude: -30.946800 * Longitude: -38.041200 * Date/Time: 1980-03-30T00:00:00 * Elevation: -2963.0 m * Penetration: 50.9 m * Recovery: 48.2 m * Location: South Atlantic/FLANK * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 12 cores; 50.9 m cored; 0 m drilled; 94.6 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Quartz	Qz	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Feldspar	Fsp	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Mica	Mica	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Glauconite	Glt	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Pyrite, FeS2	Py	%	Smear slide analysis
20	Limonite	Lm	%	Smear slide analysis
21	Heavy minerals	HM	%	Smear slide analysis
22	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis
23	Micronodules	Micronod	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

523 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Carb [%]	10 Nannos [%]	11 Foram [%]	12 Diatoms [%]	13 Spiculae [%]	14 Qz [%]	15 Fsp [%]	16 Mica [%]	17 Clay min [%]	18 Glt [%]	19 Py [%]	20 Lm [%]	21 HM [%]	22 Volc glass [%]	23 Micronod [%]
1.27	72-517-1-11,127	20	30	50	Quaternary	MARLY FORAM-NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	10	40	10	0	2	2	0	0	39	0	0	0	0	1	0
1.90	72-517-1-2,40	30	40	30	Quaternary	FORAM-NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	10	40	20	0	0	2	2	0	30	0	0	0	0	2	0
3.40	72-517-2-1,90	30	40	30	Quaternary	FORAM-NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	35	30	0	0	0	2	0	29	0	0	0	2	1	0
3.95	72-517-2-11,145	10	40	50	Quaternary	NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	5	70	10	0	0	2	0	0	15	0	0	0	0	0	0
5.30	72-517-2-21,130	10	50	40	Quaternary	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	60	20	0	0	2	2	0	15	0	2	0	2	2	0
8.80	72-517-3-2,40	10	40	50	Quaternary	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	20	60	10	0	0	0	0	0	10	0	0	0	2	2	0
14.65	72-517-4-3,35	10	50	40	Quaternary	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	75	10	0	0	1	1	0	7	0	2	0	1	2	0
14.83	72-517-4-3,53	10	50	40	Quaternary	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	70	20	0	2	0	0	0	10	0	0	0	0	2	0
15.50	72-517-4-31,120	5	55	40	Quaternary	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	80	10	0	0	0	0	0	10	0	0	0	0	2	0
17.90	72-517-5-2,70	10	40	50	Quaternary	FORAM NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	65	15	2	0	0	0	0	17	0	0	3	0	2	2
22.30	72-517-6-2,70	2	58	40	Quaternary	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	86	3	0	0	2	2	0	10	0	0	2	0	1	0
24.30	72-517-6-31,120	8	32	60	Quaternary	FORAM-NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	80	10	0	0	2	2	0	8	0	0	2	0	0	2
26.05	72-517-7-2,5	10	30	60	Upper pliocene	FORAM-NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	72	10	0	0	2	2	0	15	0	0	1	0	1	1
26.70	72-517-7-2,70	3	37	60	Upper pliocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	87	3	2	0	2	2	0	10	0	0	2	0	2	2
31.10	72-517-8-2,70	3	32	65	Upper pliocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	79	5	0	0	2	2	0	15	0	0	2	0	2	1
32.60	72-517-8-3,70	5	30	65	Upper pliocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	85	8	0	0	2	2	0	5	0	0	1	2	1	2
34.00	72-517-9-1,70	5	35	60	Upper pliocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	85	5	0	0	2	2	0	10	0	0	2	0	2	2
35.30	72-517-9-2,50	1	44	55	Upper pliocene	NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	84	1	0	0	2	2	0	13	0	0	1	2	2	1
39.90	72-517-10-2,70	10	60	30	Upper pliocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	70	15	0	0	2	0	0	10	0	0	0	0	2	0
42.66	72-517-11-1,56	15	20	65	Upper pliocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	numerical abundance	0	65	15	0	0	2	0	3	6	3	0	0	0	0	0
44.90	72-517-11-21,130	20	15	65	Upper pliocene		relative abundance	0	66	22	0	0	2	0	2	5	2	2	0	0	0	0
47.20	72-517-12-1,70	15	15	70	Upper pliocene		relative abundance	0	70	15	0	0	1	2	0	9	2	0	0	0	1	1
49.45	72-517-12-21,145	15	20	65	Upper pliocene		numerical abundance	0	70	16	0	0	0	0	3	2	0	0	0	0	2	2
51.11	72-517-12-CC,11	20	15	65			relative abundance	16	60	20	0	0	2	0	2	0	1	0	0	0	0	1