Citation:

PANGAEA.231016

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Walton, William H; Tjalsma, R C; Suzyumov, Alexey E; Shor, A N; Pujol, Claude; de Melo, Ubirajara; Hamilton, Norman; Gamboa, Luiz; Cepek, Pavel; Coulbourn, William T; Barker, Peter F; Carlson, Richard L; Johnson, David A (1983): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, LXXII, 1024 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.72.1983

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods. hdl:10013/epic.32353.d001

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: -30.276500 * Longitude: -35.285300

Date/Time Start: 1980-03-11T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1980-03-11T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 2.20 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 58.50 m

Event(s):

72-516A * Latitude: -30.276500 * Longitude: -35.285300 * Date/Time: 1980-03-11T00:00:00 * Elevation: -1313.0 m * Penetration: 69.5 m * Recovery: 60.9 m * Location: South Atlantic/CONT RISE * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 15 cores; 65.1 m cored; 4.4 m drilled; 93.6 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Pteropoda	Pteropoda	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Lamellibranchiata	Lamellibranchiata	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Minerals, other	Min other	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Quartz	Qz	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Zeolite	Zeo	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
20	Opaque minerals	Opaque	%	Smear slide analysis
21	Heavy minerals	HM	%	Smear slide analysis
22	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

269 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Carb [%]	10 Nannos [%]	11 Foram [%]	12 Pteropoda [%]	13 Lamellibranchiata [%]	14 Diatoms [%]	15 Spiculae [%]	16 Min other [%]	17 Qz [%]	18 Zeo [%]	19 Clay min [%]	20 Opaque [%]	21 HM [%]	22 Volc glass [%]
2.20	72-516A-1-2,70	10	20	70	Quaternary	FORAM-NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	82	15	0	2	2	0	0	1	0	2	0	2	1
5.70	72-516A-2-2,70	25	30	45	Quaternary	FORAM-NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	59	40	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0
13.60	72-516A-4-11,130	35	5	60	Upper pliocene		numerical abundance	0	62	35	0	0	0	0	3	0	0	0	0	0	0
18.90	72-516A-5-2,70	5	30	65	Lower pliocene	FORAM-NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	5	87	5	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	2
23.30	72-516A-6-2,70	10	20	70	Lower pliocene	FORAM-NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	82	12	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1
28.95	72-516A-7-3,45	25	5	70	Lower pliocene	FORAM-NANNO OOZE	numerical abundance	0	73	25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0	0
31.30	72-516A-8-11,140	15	5	80	Lower pliocene		relative abundance	0	85	15	0	0	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0
35.00	72-516A-9-1,70	20	15	65	Lower pliocene	FORAM-NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	5	70	25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
39.40	72-516A-10-1,70	5	25	70	Lower pliocene	FORAM-NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	84	10	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	1
43.80	72-516A-11-1,70	2	18	70	Neogene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	93	5	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	1
49.70	72-516A-12-2,70	15	5	80	Upper miocene		numerical abundance	0	85	15	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
55.30	72-516A-13-3,40	15	65	20	Upper miocene	FORAM-NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	84	15	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	2
58.50	72-516A-14-2,70	10	80	10	Upper miocene		Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	89	10	0	0	0	2	0	0	2	0	0	0	2