Citation:

PANGAEA.231005

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Schrader, Ed L; Moorby, S A; Migdisov, Areg A; Levi, Shaul; Laverne, Christine; Karato, Shun-ichiro; Jones, S C; Hubberten, Hans-Wolfgang; Bender, Michael L; Becker, Keir; Barrett, T J; Borella, Peter E; Honnorez, Jose J; von Herzen, Richard P (1983): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. U.S. Government Printing Office, LXX, 481 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.70.1983

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 1.613200 * Longitude: -86.410000

Date/Time Start: 1979-11-29T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1979-11-29T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 39.16 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 113.76 m

Event(s):

70-510 * Latitude: 1.613200 * Longitude: -86.410000 * Date/Time: 1979-11-29T00:00:00 * Elevation: -2781.0 m * Penetration: 132.5 m * Recovery: 63 m * Location: North Pacific * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 11 cores; 75.5 m cored; 0 m drilled; 83.4 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Silicoflagellates	Silicoflag	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Quartz	Qz	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Feldspar	Fsp	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Zeolite	Zeo	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Mica	Mica	%	Smear slide analysis
20	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
21	Pyrite, FeS2	Py	%	Smear slide analysis
22	Iron	Fe	%	Smear slide analysis
23	Heavy minerals	HM	%	Smear slide analysis
24	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis
25	Micronodules	Micronod	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

768 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Carb [%]	10 Nannos [%]	11 Foram [%]	12 Rad [%]	13 Diatoms [%]	14 Silicoflag [%]	15 Spiculae [%]	16 Qz [%]	17 Fsp [%]	18 Zeo [%]	19 Mica [%]	20 Clay min [%]	21 Py [%]	22 Fe [%]	23 HM [%]	24 Volc glass [%]	25 Micronod [%]
39.16	70-510-2-1,66	Lower pleistocene	SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	65	5	5	15	2	2	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	2	2
42.16	70-510-2-3,66	Lower pleistocene	SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	65	5	2	15	1	1	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	2	0
44.50	70-510-2-5,0	Lower pleistocene	DIATOMACEOUS NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	8	55	5	5	20	1	2	0	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	2	2
67.62	70-510-3-1,62	Lower pleistocene	SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	60	3	10	20	2	2	0	0	0	0	2	2	2	0	2	0
68.36	70-510-3-11,136	Lower pleistocene	NANNOFOSSIL-DIATOM OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	30	5	10	50	5	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0
69.13	70-510-3-2,63	Lower pleistocene	SILICEOUS NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	40	5	1	35	10	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
70.64	70-510-3-3,64	Lower pleistocene	NANNOFOSSIL DIATOM OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	30	5	10	40	10	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
72.40	70-510-3-4,90	Lower pleistocene	SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	50	3	15	25	2	3	0	0	0	0	2	1	0	0	0	0
73.90	70-510-3-5,90	Lower pleistocene	NANNOFOSSIL RADIOLARIAN DIATOM OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	25	5	20	45	5	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0
75.35	70-510-3-6,85	Upper pliocene	NANNOFOSSIL RADIOLARIAN DIATOM OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	20	5	20	40	10	5	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
75.40	70-510-3-6,90	Upper pliocene	NANNOFOSSIL SILICEOUS OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	10	35	5	15	30	2	5	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
77.21	70-510-4-1,71	Upper pliocene	NANNOFOSSIL SILICEOUS OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	35	5	15	30	2	5	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0	2	0
78.71	70-510-4-2,71	Upper pliocene	SILICEOUS NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	10	50	5	10	20	2	5	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0
80.21	70-510-4-3,71	Upper pliocene	NANNOFOSSIL SILICEOUS OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	10	40	5	8	30	5	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0	2	0
81.65	70-510-4-4,65	Upper pliocene	NANNOFOSSIL SILICEOUS OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	35	2	5	45	5	2	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	2	2
83.16	70-510-4-5,66	Upper pliocene	NANNOFOSSIL DIATOM OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	3	30	2	15	35	0	15	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
84.62	70-510-4-6,62	Upper pliocene	NANNOFOSSIL SILICEOUS OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	40	2	5	40	2	5	0	0	0	2	0	1	0	0	2	0
86.79	70-510-5-1,79	Upper pliocene	NANNOFOSSIL SILICEOUS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	3	40	5	10	40	1	5	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
89.79	70-510-5-3,79	Upper pliocene	NANNOFOSSIL SILICEOUS OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	30	5	15	30	3	5	0	0	0	0	5	0	0	0	2	0
90.70	70-510-5-4,20	Upper pliocene	NANNO SILICEOUS OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	3	45	2	10	30	3	5	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	2	2	0
92.60	70-510-5-5,60	Upper pliocene	SILICEOUS NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	50	2	5	30	2	3	2	0	0	0	5	0	0	0	0	0
95.22	70-510-5-7,22	Upper pliocene	NANNOFOSSIL DIATOM OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	35	0	0	35	10	15	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
100.70	70-510-6-4,70	Upper pliocene	NANNOFOSSIL SILICEOUS OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	50	3	5	35	2	3	0	0	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0
102.20	70-510-6-5,70	Upper pliocene	NANNOFOSSIL SILICEOUS OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	35	5	15	35	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	2	2	0	2	2
105.80	70-510-7-1,80	Upper pliocene	SILICEOUS-NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	50	20	5	30	1	2	0	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0
107.30	70-510-7-2,80	Upper pliocene	NANNO SILICEOUS OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	40	10	5	40	1	3	0	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	2	0
108.80	70-510-7-3,80	Upper pliocene	NANNO SILICEOUS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	2	40	5	7	40	2	1	0	0	0	0	3	0	0	0	0	0
110.07	70-510-7-4,57	Upper pliocene	SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	3	40	8	8	35	1	2	0	0	0	0	3	0	0	0	2	0
111.57	70-510-7-5,57	Lower pliocene	ASH	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	10	0	0	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	90	2
112.49	70-510-8-1,99	Lower pliocene	DIATOMACEOUS NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	3	45	5	5	40	1	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0
112.85	70-510-7-6,35	Lower pliocene	ASH	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	10	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	90	2
113.76	70-510-8-2,76	Lower pliocene	DIATOMACEOUS NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	4	40	5	8	40	1	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0