Honnorez, Jose J; von Herzen, Richard P (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 70-509 [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.231003
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Related to:
DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM
Schrader, Ed L; Moorby, S A; Migdisov, Areg A; Levi, Shaul; Laverne, Christine; Karato, Shun-ichiro; Jones, S C; Hubberten, Hans-Wolfgang; Bender, Michael L; Becker, Keir; Barrett, T J; Borella, Peter E; Honnorez, Jose J; von Herzen, Richard P (1983): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. U.S. Government Printing Office, LXX, 481 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.70.1983
Further details:
Project(s):
Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)
Coverage:
Latitude: 0.589000 * Longitude: -86.131500
Date/Time Start: 1979-11-27T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1979-11-27T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.30 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 31.05 m
Event(s):
70-509 * Latitude: 0.589000 * Longitude: -86.131500 * Date/Time: 1979-11-27T00:00:00 * Elevation: -2677.0 m * Penetration: 32.3 m * Recovery: 32.5 m * Location: North Pacific/MOUND * Campaign: Leg70 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 9 cores; 32.3 m cored; 0 m drilled; 100.5 % recovery
Parameter(s):
# | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DEPTH, sediment/rock | Depth sed | m | Geocode | ||
2 | Sample code/label | Sample label | DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation | |||
3 | Sand | Sand | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
4 | Silt | Silt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
5 | Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay | <2 µm | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
6 | Stratigraphy | Stratigraphy | Smear slide analysis | |||
7 | Lithology/composition/facies | Lithology | Smear slide analysis | |||
8 | Comment | Comment | Smear slide analysis | |||
9 | Carbonates | Carb | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
10 | Nannofossils | Nannos | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
11 | Foraminifera | Foram | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
12 | Radiolarians | Rad | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
13 | Diatoms | Diatoms | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
14 | Silicoflagellates | Silicoflag | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
15 | Spiculae | Spiculae | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
16 | Zeolite | Zeo | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
17 | Clay minerals | Clay min | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
18 | Opaque minerals | Opaque | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
19 | Pyrite, FeS2 | Py | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
20 | Iron | Fe | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
21 | Heavy minerals | HM | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
22 | Volcanic glass | Volc glass | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
23 | Micronodules | Micronod | % | Smear slide analysis |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
745 data points
Data
1 Depth sed [m] | 2 Sample label | 3 Sand [%] | 4 Silt [%] | 5 <2 µm [%] | 6 Stratigraphy | 7 Lithology | 8 Comment | 9 Carb [%] | 10 Nannos [%] | 11 Foram [%] | 12 Rad [%] | 13 Diatoms [%] | 14 Silicoflag [%] | 15 Spiculae [%] | 16 Zeo [%] | 17 Clay min [%] | 18 Opaque [%] | 19 Py [%] | 20 Fe [%] | 21 HM [%] | 22 Volc glass [%] | 23 Micronod [%] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.30 | 70-509-1-1,30 | 10 | 10 | 80 | Upper pleistocene | SILICEOUS NANNOFOSSIL OOZE | relative abundance | 5 | 70 | 5 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
0.88 | 70-509-1-1,88 | 15 | 15 | 70 | Upper pleistocene | relative abundance | 5 | 60 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
3.59 | 70-509-2-21,109 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper pleistocene | SILICEOUS NANNOFOSSIL OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 65 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
6.06 | 70-509-3-1,66 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper pleistocene | SILICEOUS NANNOFOSSIL OOZE | relative abundance | 0 | 60 | 5 | 15 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7.20 | 70-509-3-2,30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper pleistocene | NANNOFOSSIL-SILICEOUS OOZE | relative abundance | 5 | 30 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7.68 | 70-509-3-2,78 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper pleistocene | SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE | relative abundance | 2 | 55 | 10 | 8 | 20 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
9.07 | 70-509-3-3,67 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper pleistocene | SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 5 | 60 | 5 | 5 | 20 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
10.73 | 70-509-4-1,93 | 2 | 8 | 90 | Upper pleistocene | NANNOFOSSIL OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 5 | 80 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
10.90 | 70-509-4-11,110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper pleistocene | SILICEOUS NANNOFOSSIL OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 3 | 70 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
11.96 | 70-509-4-2,66 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper pleistocene | ASH LAYER | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 75 | 0 |
12.08 | 70-509-4-2,78 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper pleistocene | SILICEOUS FORAMINIFERA NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 5 | 50 | 15 | 15 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
13.20 | 70-509-4-3,40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper pleistocene | SILICEOUS FORAM-NANNO OOZE | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 60 | 20 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
13.35 | 70-509-4-3,55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper pleistocene | SILICEOUS FORAM NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 2 | 60 | 20 | 3 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15.02 | 70-509-5-1,82 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper pleistocene | SILICEOUS FORAM NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 50 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
16.36 | 70-509-5-2,66 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper pleistocene | SILICEOUS FORAM NANNO OOZE | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 50 | 15 | 10 | 15 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
16.58 | 70-509-5-2,88 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper pleistocene | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 50 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | |
16.75 | 70-509-5-21,105 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper pleistocene | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 5 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
17.26 | 70-509-5-3,6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper pleistocene | SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 70 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
17.90 | 70-509-5-3,70 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper pleistocene | FORAMINIFERA SILICEOUS NANNOFOSSIL OOZEM VOLC.GLAS TR,CARB 5 | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 50 | 10 | 15 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
18.34 | 70-509-5-31,114 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper pleistocene | SILICEOUS NANNOFOSSIL OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 5 | 65 | 3 | 5 | 15 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
19.47 | 70-509-6-1,87 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper pleistocene | SILICEOUS FORAM NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 2 | 60 | 15 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
20.66 | 70-509-6-2,56 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper pleistocene | SILICEOUS FORAM NANNO OOZE | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 50 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
20.97 | 70-509-6-2,87 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper pleistocene | FORAM SILICEOUS NANNOFOSSIL OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 60 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
22.20 | 70-509-6-3,60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper pleistocene | SILICEOUS FORAM NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 2 | 70 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
23.02 | 70-509-7-1,2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper pleistocene | SILICEOUS NANNO-OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 5 | 67 | 5 | 5 | 15 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
23.63 | 70-509-7-1,63 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper pleistocene | (SILIC) NANNOFOSSIL OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 5 | 80 | 5 | 5 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
25.13 | 70-509-7-2,63 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper pleistocene | SILIC NANNOFOSSIL OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 3 | 80 | 3 | 5 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
27.22 | 70-509-7-31,122 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper pleistocene | SILICEOUS FORAM NANNOFOSSIL OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 5 | 65 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
28.26 | 70-509-8-1,86 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper pleistocene | SILICEOUS FORAM NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 5 | 60 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
28.61 | 70-509-8-11,121 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper pleistocene | SILICEOUS FORAM NANNO OOZE | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 5 | 70 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
28.62 | 70-509-8-11,122 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper pleistocene | FORAMINIFERA NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 10 | 70 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
29.12 | 70-509-8-2,22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper pleistocene | FORAM NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 8 | 70 | 15 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
30.47 | 70-509-8-3,7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper pleistocene | FORAM NANNO OOZE | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 5 | 75 | 15 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
31.05 | 70-509-8-3,65 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper pleistocene | NANNOFOSSIL OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 10 | 80 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |