Citation:

PANGAEA.230985

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Worsley, Thomas R; Resig, Johanna M; Moberly, Ralph; Martini, Erlend; Kroenke, Loren W; Heath, G Ross; Gealy, E L; Bronnimann, P; Riedel, William R; Winterer, Edward L (1971): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, VII, 834 pp + 1757 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.7.1971

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods. hdl:10013/epic.32353.d001

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 2.393500 * Longitude: -166.121800

Date/Time Start: 1969-09-19T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1969-09-19T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 50.10 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 191.60 m

Event(s):

7-66 * Latitude: 2.393500 * Longitude: -166.121800 * Date/Time: 1969-09-19T00:00:00 * Elevation: -5310.0 m * Penetration: 193 m * Recovery: 48.8 m * Location: North Pacific/BASIN * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 11 cores; 72 m cored; 0 m drilled; 67.7 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Minerals, other	Min other	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Feldspar	Fsp	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Zeolite	Zeo	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Iron	Fe	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Pyroxene	Pyrox	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis
20	Palagonite	Palagonite	%	Smear slide analysis
21	Micronodules	Micronod	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

338 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Nannos [%]	10 Foram [%]	11 Rad [%]	12 Diatoms [%]	13 Spiculae [%]	14 Min other [%]	15 Fsp [%]	16 Zeo [%]	17 Fe [%]	18 Pyrox [%]	19 Volc glass [%]	20 Palagonite [%]	21 Micronod [%]
50.10	7-66-1-CC,0	60	60	35		DIATOMACEOUS RADIOLARIAN OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	33	33	14	0	0	3	3	0	0	0	14
81.54	7-66-2-21,104	60	60	35	Lower miocene	RADIOLARIAN OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	23	0	55	23	6	0	0	0	0	0	6	0	0
81.86	7-66-2-21,136	60	60	60	Lower miocene	NANNO DIATOM RADIOLARIAN OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	29	0	29	29	0	0	0	0	0	0	12	0	0
83.60	7-66-2-CC,0	60	60	35	Lower miocene	DIATOMACEOUS RADIOLARIAN OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	13	4	32	32	13	0	0	3	0	0	0	3	0
126.10	7-66-3-CC,0	35	60	35		RADIOLARIAN OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	55	23	6	0	0	0	23	0	6	0	6
148.10	7-66-4-CC,0	10	35	60	Paleocene	ZEOLITIC MUDSTONE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	4	0	0	0	55	6	0	6	0	6
171.10	7-66-6-CC,0	10	35	60	Paleocene	ZEOLITIC BROWN CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	6	6	0	0	0	6	55	23	0	6	6	6
180.10	7-66-7-CC,0	0	35	60	Paleocene	ZEOLITIC MUDSTONE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	55	6	0	6	6	23
187.00	7-66-9-1,0	0	0	0	Upper cretaceous	PYROCLASTIC DEPOSIT	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	0	4	0	0	0	6	6	6	0	6	23	55
188.17	7-66-9-11,117	35	60	60	Upper cretaceous	VOLCANOCLASTIC CLAY OR SILT	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	0	0	4	0	0	4	38	38	16
188.29	7-66-9-11,129	60	60	60	Upper cretaceous	ZEOLITIC TUFF	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	0	0	6	55	0	6	23	6	0
188.47	7-66-9-11,147	35	60	35	Upper cretaceous	ZEOLITIC TUFF	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	55	0	6	23	6	0
189.10	7-66-8-CC,0	10	10	60	Upper cretaceous	PELAGIC BROWN CLAY, PROBABLY ZEOLITIC	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	6	0	0	0	6	55	23	0	6	6	23
191.00	7-66-9-31,100	10	60	60	Upper cretaceous	MANGANESE RICH ZEOLITIC TUFF	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	0	55	6	23	0	0	55	0	0
191.60	7-66-9-CC,0	10	10	60	Upper cretaceous	FERROMANGANESE RICH PELAGIC CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	0	0	23	0	23	0	23	23	23
191.60	7-66-9-CC,0	10	35	60	Upper cretaceous	PELAGIC CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	0	0	6	0	6	0	23	23	23
191.60	7-66-9-CC,0	10	35	60	Upper cretaceous	PROBABLY ALTERED VOLCANIC FRAGMENT	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	0	0	6	6	0	0	6	23	55