Citation:

PANGAEA.230983

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Worsley, Thomas R; Resig, Johanna M; Moberly, Ralph; Martini, Erlend; Kroenke, Loren W; Heath, G Ross; Gealy, E L; Bronnimann, P; Riedel, William R; Winterer, Edward L (1971): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, VII, 834 pp + 1757 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.7.1971

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 4.353500 * Longitude: 176.985700

Date/Time Start: 1969-09-11T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1969-09-11T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 7.00 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 146.10 m

Event(s):

7-65 * Latitude: 4.353500 * Longitude: 176.985700 * Date/Time: 1969-09-11T00:00:00 * Elevation: -6142.0 m * Penetration: 145 m * Recovery: 130.5 m * Location: North Pacific/BASIN * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 17 cores; 144 m cored; 0 m drilled; 90.6 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Silicoflagellates	Silicoflag	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Minerals, other	Min other	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Feldspar	Fsp	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Zeolite	Zeo	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Pyrite, FeS2	Py	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Iron	Fe	%	Smear slide analysis
20	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis
21	Palagonite	Palagonite	%	Smear slide analysis
22	Micronodules	Micronod	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

440 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Nannos [%]	10 Foram [%]	11 Rad [%]	12 Diatoms [%]	13 Silicoflag [%]	14 Spiculae [%]	15 Min other [%]	16 Fsp [%]	17 Zeo [%]	18 Py [%]	19 Fe [%]	20 Volc glass [%]	21 Palagonite [%]	22 Micronod [%]
7.00	7-65-1-41,150	10	60	60	Cenozoic	RADIOLARIAN OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	4	4	37	16	0	4	0	0	0	0	0	16	4	16
19.10	7-65-2-CC,0	10	60	60	Upper miocene	RADIOLARIAN OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	55	23	0	23	0	0	0	0	0	23	6	6
28.10	7-65-3-CC,0	35	60	35	Upper miocene	RADIOLARIAN OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	35	14	0	4	0	4	0	0	14	14	0	14
37.10	7-65-4-CC,0	60	60	35	Upper miocene	RADIOLARIAN OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	33	33	14	0	0	0	0	0	14	3	3	0
46.10	7-65-5-CC,0	35	60	35	Middle miocene	RADIOLARIAN OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	31	31	13	13	0	0	0	0	3	3	3	3
48.16	7-65-6-2,66	60	60	35	Middle miocene	RADIOLARIAN OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	39	16	0	4	0	0	16	0	16	4	4	0
55.10	7-65-6-CC,0	35	60	35	Middle miocene	RADIOLARIAN OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	55	23	0	23	0	0	0	0	23	0	0	6
62.60	7-65-7-CC,0	60	60	35	Middle miocene	RADIOLARIAN OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	35	4	0	4	0	0	0	0	14	14	14	14
73.10	7-65-8-CC,0	35	60	35	Lower miocene	RADIOLARIAN OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	55	0	0	6	0	0	0	0	23	6	6	6
83.10	7-65-9-CC,0	35	60	35	Lower miocene	RADIOLARIAN OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	55	6	0	6	0	0	0	0	6	6	6	6
89.10	7-65-10-CC,0	60	60	35	Lower miocene	RADIOLARIAN OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	55	6	0	23	0	0	0	0	23	6	6	6
101.10	7-65-11-CC,0	35	60	35	Oligocene	RADIOLARIAN OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	55	0	0	6	0	0	0	0	6	6	0	6
110.10	7-65-12-CC,0	35	60	35	Oligocene	RADIOLARIAN OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	55	0	0	6	0	0	6	0	6	6	0	6
119.10	7-65-13-CC,0	60	60	35	Oligocene	RADIOLARIAN OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	55	6	0	23	0	0	0	0	23	6	6	6
123.80	7-65-14-4,30	60	60	35	Oligocene	RADIOLARIAN OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	39	4	0	16	0	0	0	0	16	16	4	4
124.45	7-65-14-4,95	60	60	35	Oligocene	NANNOFOSSIL RADIOLARIAN OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	55	23	6	6	0	6	0	0	0	0	23	6	0	6
126.07	7-65-14-51,107	60	60	60	Oligocene	FORAMINIFERAL NANNOFOSSIL CHALK OOZE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	31	31	3	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	13	13	3	3
127.22	7-65-14-6,72	60	35	60	Upper eocene	ASHY NANNOFOSSIL CHALK OOZE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	28	12	12	0	0	0	12	12	0	0	3	12	12	0
128.10	7-65-14-CC,0	35	60	35	Upper eocene	CALCAREOUS RADIOLARIAN OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	23	23	55	0	0	6	0	0	6	0	6	6	0	0
133.10	7-65-15-CC,0	35	60	35	Upper eocene	CALCAREOUS RADIOLARIAN OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	20	8	20	2	0	2	0	2	0	0	20	2	20	2
146.10	7-65-16-CC,0	60	60	35		RADIOLARIAN OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	4	4	36	4	0	15	0	0	0	0	15	4	15	4