Citation:

PANGAEA.230928

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Zolotarev, Boris P; Stephen, Ralph A; Schmincke, Hans-Ulrich; Salisbury, Matthew H; Rangin, Claude; Morrison, M Ann; Kudo, A M; Hattner, J; Gutiérrez-Estrada, Mario; Flower, Martin F J; Duennebier, Frederick K; Day, Ron; Cambon, P; Blackinton, Grant; Benson, Richard N; Lewis, Brian T R; Robinson, P (1983): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, LXV, 752 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.65.1983

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 22.789300 * Longitude: -107.993500

Date/Time Start: 1979-01-24T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1979-01-24T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 114.32 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 136.65 m

Event(s):

65-482F * Latitude: 22.789300 * Longitude: -107.993500 * Date/Time: 1979-01-24T00:00:00 * Elevation: -2998.0 m * Penetration: 145 m * Recovery: 16.1 m * Location: North Pacific/Gulf of California/CONT RISE * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 4 cores; 31.5 m cored; 7.5 m drilled; 51 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Quartz	Qz	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Feldspar	Fsp	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Zeolite	Zeo	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Mica	Mica	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Pyrite, FeS2	Py	%	Smear slide analysis
20	Heavy minerals	HM	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

133 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Carb [%]	10 Nannos [%]	11 Foram [%]	12 Diatoms [%]	13 Spiculae [%]	14 Qz [%]	15 Fsp [%]	16 Zeo [%]	17 Mica [%]	18 Clay min [%]	19 Py [%]	20 HM [%]
114.32	65-482F-2-1,82	1	45	55	Upper quaternary	SILTY CLAY	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	5	0	0	25	15	0	0	0	55	2	2
115.60	65-482F-2-2,60	0	40	60	Upper quaternary	SILTY CLAY	Minor lithology; relative abundance	1	12	0	0	0	12	1	0	0	72	1	2
117.00	65-482F-2-3,50	1	29	70	Upper quaternary	SILTY CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	1	15	2	0	0	8	3	0	2	70	1	2
135.75	65-482F-4-3,25	0	68	32	Upper quaternary	CALC NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	50	0	2	0	10	2	1	0	32	4	1
136.06	65-482F-4-3,56	0	65	35	Upper quaternary	CALC NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	10	35	2	2	0	5	3	1	2	35	1	0
136.60	65-482F-4-31,110	0	45	55	Upper quaternary	SILTY CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	1	25	1	2	0	20	5	2	0	55	2	0
136.65	65-482F-4-31,115	0	30	70	Upper quaternary	SILTY CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	1	7	2	0	0	15	5	1	2	70	2	1