Citation:

PANGAEA.230914

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Vacquier, Victor; Simoneit, Bernd R T; Schrader, Hans-Jürgen; Saunders, Andrew D; Rueda-Gaxiola, Jaime; Niemitz, Jeffrey W; Molina-Cruz, Adolfo; Matoba, Y; Lyle, Mitchell W; Kelts, Kerry; Kastner, Miriam; Guerrero-Garcia, Jose; Gieskes, Joris M; Fornari, Daniel J; Einsele, Gerhard; Aubry, Marie-Pierre; Aguayo, J Eduardo; Curray, Joseph R; Moore, David G (1982): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. U.S. Government Printing Office, LXIV, 507 pp + 1303 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.64.1982

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 23.056000 * Longitude: -109.059500

Date/Time Start: 1978-12-10T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1978-12-10T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.30 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 9.60 m

Event(s):

64-475B * Latitude: 23.056000 * Longitude: -109.059500 * Date/Time: 1978-12-10T00:00:00 * Elevation: -2593.0 m * Penetration: 96 m * Recovery: 10.4 m * Location: North Pacific/Gulf of California/SLOPE * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 4 cores; 29.5 m cored; 0 m drilled; 35.2 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Silicoflagellates	Silicoflag	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Quartz	Qz	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Feldspar	Fsp	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Mica	Mica	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
20	Pyrite, FeS2	Py	%	Smear slide analysis
21	Heavy minerals	HM	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

79 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Carb [%]	10 Nannos [%]	11 Foram [%]	12 Rad [%]	13 Diatoms [%]	14 Silicoflag [%]	15 Spiculae [%]	16 Qz [%]	17 Fsp [%]	18 Mica [%]	19 Clay min [%]	20 Py [%]	21 HM [%]
0.30	64-475B-1-1,30	5	40	55	Upper pleistocene	DIATOMACEOUS SILTY CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	2	3	1	5	23	2	3	5	5	2	46	1	5
1.80	64-475B-1-2,30	7	45	48	Upper pleistocene	RADS BEARING DIATOMACEOUS SILTY CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	3	3	2	5	25	3	2	7	8	0	40	2	3
6.30	64-475B-1-5,30	2	60	40	Upper pleistocene	NANNO BEARING DIATOMACEOUS CLAYEY SILT	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	1	20	2	1	35	2	0	2	3	0	30	2	1
9.60	64-475B-1-7,60	1	40	60		PALE OLIVE, DIATOM NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	40	3	5	15	0	2	5	3	2	30	3	1