Citation:

PANGAEA.230908

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Wolfart, R; Shibata, Tsugio; Poore, Richard Z; Pisciotto, Kenneth A; Verma, Surendra P; Niem, Alan; Leinen, Margaret W; Grechin, V I; Douglas, A G; Denham, C R; Crouch, James; Bukry, David; Barron, John A; Yeats, Robert S; Haq, Bilal U (1981): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, LXIII, 967 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.63.1981

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 23.005800 * Longitude: -113.995200

Date/Time Start: 1978-11-18T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1978-11-18T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.13 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 102.54 m

Event(s):

63-472 * Latitude: 23.005800 * Longitude: -113.995200 * Date/Time: 1978-11-18T00:00:00 * Elevation: -3831.0 m * Penetration: 137.5 m * Recovery: 65.1 m * Location: North Pacific/PLATEAU * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 16 cores; 137.5 m cored; 0 m drilled; 47.4 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Dolomite	Dol	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Silicoflagellates	Silicoflag	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Quartz	Qz	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Feldspar	Fsp	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Mica	Mica	%	Smear slide analysis
20	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
21	Glauconite	Glt	%	Smear slide analysis
22	Pyrite, FeS2	Py	%	Smear slide analysis
23	Iron	Fe	%	Smear slide analysis
24	Heavy minerals	HM	%	Smear slide analysis
25	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis
26	Terrigenous	Terr	%	Smear slide analysis	terrigeneous detritus

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

675 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Carb [%]	10 Dol [%]	11 Nannos [%]	12 Foram [%]	13 Rad [%]	14 Diatoms [%]	15 Silicoflag [%]	16 Spiculae [%]	17 Qz [%]	18 Fsp [%]	19 Mica [%]	20 Clay min [%]	21 Glt [%]	22 Py [%]	23 Fe [%]	24 HM [%]	25 Volc glass [%]	26 Terr [%]
0.13	63-472-1-1,13	10	90	Lower quaternary	CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	2	2	2	90	0	5	0	2	2	0
2.47	63-472-1-2,97	4	96	Lower quaternary	CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	2	2	2	0	0	1	0	1	1	0
5.90	63-472-2-1,40	5	95	Pliocene	CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	2	95	0	2	0	1	1	0
12.05	63-472-2-5,55	5	95	Pliocene	CLAY	Minor lithology; relative abundance	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1	2	0	0	2	0	2	2	0
18.57	63-472-3-3,57	5	95	Upper miocene	CLAY	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	1	2	2	2	1	2	2	95	0	2	0	2	1	0
24.60	63-472-4-1,10	7	93	Upper miocene	SILICEOUS CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	1	2	2	2	1	2	2	93	0	2	0	2	1	0
25.00	63-472-4-1,50	13	87	Upper miocene	SILICEOUS CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	3	3	0	4	1	2	2	87	0	1	0	2	1	0
35.00	63-472-5-11,100	16	84	Upper miocene	SILICEOUS CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	3	5	1	3	1	1	2	84	0	1	0	2	1	0
35.26	63-472-5-11,126	60	40	Upper miocene	DIATOM CLAY	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	15	25	2	5	1	1	2	50	0	1	0	2	2	0
35.40	63-472-5-11,140	90	10	Upper miocene	DIATOM OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	5	70	10	1	2	1	2	10	0	0	0	2	1	0
35.60	63-472-5-2,10	85	15	Upper miocene	DIATOM OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	10	60	10	1	2	2	2	15	0	1	0	2	1	0
47.30	63-472-6-3,80	85	15	Upper miocene	CLAYEY DIATOM OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	10	65	4	1	2	1	2	15	0	1	0	2	1	0
48.66	63-472-6-4,66	85	15	Upper miocene	CLAYEY DIATOM OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	10	60	3	2	3	1	2	15	2	5	0	2	1	0
53.90	63-472-7-1,90	80	20	Upper miocene	CLAYEY DIATOMACEOUS OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	8	60	5	1	3	1	2	20	0	1	0	2	1	0
63.00	63-472-8-1,50	80	20	Upper miocene	CLAYEY DIATOMACEOUS OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	5	60	5	3	3	2	2	20	0	1	0	2	1	0
72.50	63-472-9-1,50	10	90	Middle miocene	DIATOM RAD CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	15	16	1	2	5	1	1	54	2	2	0	0	3	0
73.27	63-472-9-11,127	13	87	Middle miocene	CLAY	relative abundance	0	0	2	0	1	6	2	2	3	2	2	87	0	2	0	0	1	91
76.95	63-472-9-4,45	10	90	Middle miocene	CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	2	1	2	2	7	1	1	0	2	1	0	2	0	0
82.50	63-472-10-11,100	60	40	Middle miocene	CLAYEY DIATOMACEOUS OOZE	relative abundance	0	0	0	0	5	52	2	1	2	0	0	40	0	0	0	0	2	42
83.75	63-472-10-2,75	36	64	Middle miocene	DIATOMACEOUS CLAY	relative abundance	0	0	0	0	5	21	2	2	6	2	2	64	0	1	0	2	3	73
91.60	63-472-11-1,60	30	70	Middle miocene	NANNO DIATOMACEOUS CLAY	relative abundance	0	0	20	0	4	20	0	2	1	0	2	50	0	2	0	0	5	56
93.01	63-472-11-2,51	17	83	Middle miocene	CLAYEY SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	0	0	66	2	7	9	2	0	1	0	0	15	0	2	0	0	2	18
93.58	63-472-11-21,108	37	63	Middle miocene	DIATOM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	0	0	54	2	0	35	0	0	0	0	0	9	0	2	0	0	2	11
95.48	63-472-11-31,148	0	0	Middle miocene	NANNO CLAY	Minor lithology; relative abundance	1	0	40	2	1	3	2	1	1	0	2	45	3	5	0	0	0	0
96.36	63-472-11-4,86	10	90	Middle miocene	SILICEOUS NANNO CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	25	2	5	10	2	1	5	1	0	53	2	2	0	0	0	0
102.05	63-472-12-2,5	3	98	Middle miocene	CLAY	relative abundance	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	2	0	0	96	0	2	0	0	1	100
102.54	63-472-12-2,54	40	60	Middle miocene	IRON-RICH DOLOMITIC NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	2	26	51	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	9	0	0	11	0	2	0