Citation:

PANGAEA.230906

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Wolfart, R; Shibata, Tsugio; Poore, Richard Z; Pisciotto, Kenneth A; Verma, Surendra P; Niem, Alan; Leinen, Margaret W; Grechin, V I; Douglas, A G; Denham, C R; Crouch, James; Bukry, David; Barron, John A; Yeats, Robert S; Haq, Bilal U (1981): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, LXIII, 967 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.63.1981

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods. hdl:10013/epic.32353.d001

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 28.907700 * Longitude: -117.518500

Date/Time Start: 1978-11-02T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1978-11-02T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 66.53 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 166.94 m

Event(s):

63-470A * Latitude: 28.907700 * Longitude: -117.518500 * Date/Time: 1978-11-02T00:00:00 * Elevation: -3549.0 m * Penetration: 215.5 m * Recovery: 48.2 m * Location: North Pacific/ABYSSAL FLOOR * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 13 cores; 101.5 m cored; 0 m drilled; 47.5 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Dolomite	Dol	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Silicoflagellates	Silicoflag	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Quartz	Qz	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Feldspar	Fsp	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Mica	Mica	%	Smear slide analysis
20	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
21	Glauconite	Glt	%	Smear slide analysis
22	Pyrite, FeS2	Py	%	Smear slide analysis
23	Heavy minerals	HM	%	Smear slide analysis
24	Hornblende	Hbl	%	Smear slide analysis
25	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis
26	Terrigenous	Terr	%	Smear slide analysis	terrigeneous detritus

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

225 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Carb [%]	10 Dol [%]	11 Nannos [%]	12 Foram [%]	13 Rad [%]	14 Diatoms [%]	15 Silicoflag [%]	16 Spiculae [%]	17 Qz [%]	18 Fsp [%]	19 Mica [%]	20 Clay min [%]	21 Glt [%]	22 Py [%]	23 HM [%]	24 Hbl [%]	25 Volc glass [%]	26 Terr [%]
66.53	63-470A-3-1,3	8	92	Upper miocene	CLAYEY NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	3	0	54	0	1	2	0	0	2	2	2	40	0	2	2	0	2	42
68.85	63-470A-3-2,85	8	92	Upper miocene	SILICEOUS NANNO CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	2	15	2	2	7	0	1	3	0	1	68	0	0	1	0	2	0
77.14	63-470A-4-11,114	30	70	Upper miocene	DIATOMACEOUS SILTY CLAY	relative abundance	3	0	7	0	4	11	0	3	3	2	0	62	0	1	2	0	0	71
86.37	63-470A-5-1,87	0	0	Upper miocene	DIATOMACEOUS NANNO CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	3	0	40	2	7	7	2	1	2	0	0	40	2	0	2	0	0	0
162.36	63-470A-6-1,86	5	95	Middle miocene	CLAYEY NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	5	75	1	0	2	0	2	2	1	2	11	0	3	0	0	2	0
164.80	63-470A-6-3,30	2	98	Middle miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	5	91	2	0	2	0	0	2	0	2	0	0	2	0	0	2	2
165.34	63-470A-6-CC,21	2	98	Middle miocene	DOLOMITIC NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	0	15	76	2	0	0	0	0	2	2	2	3	0	2	0	0	2	0
166.52	63-470A-7-1,2	15	85	Middle miocene	CLAYEY DOLOMITIC NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	0	15	83	0	0	0	0	2	1	0	2	10	0	2	0	0	1	1
166.94	63-470A-7-1,44	50	50	Middle miocene	DOLOMITIC OR CLAYSTONE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	49	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	2	1	51	0	1	2	2	5	0