Citation:

PANGAEA.230852

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Pimm, Anthony C; Lisitzin, Alexander P; Krasheninnikov, Valery A; Kling, Stanley; Garrison, Robert E; Douglas, Robert G; Bukry, David; Boyce, Robert E; Heezen, Bruce C; Fischer, A G (1971): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, VI, 1329 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.6.1971

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 32.448300 * Longitude: 157.711700

Date/Time Start: 1969-06-28T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1969-06-28T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.52 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 8.25 m

Event(s):

6-47 * Latitude: 32.448300 * Longitude: 157.711700 * Date/Time: 1969-06-28T00:00:00 * Elevation: -2689.0 m * Penetration: 9.1 m * Recovery: 9.1 m * Location: North Pacific/PLATEAU * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 1 cores; 9.1 m cored; 0 m drilled; 100 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Components indeterminata	Comp indet	%	Smear slide analysis	other fossils
15	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Minerals, other	Min other	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Minerals	Minerals	%	Smear slide analysis	isotropic minerals
18	Zeolite	Zeo	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
20	Glauconite	Glt	%	Smear slide analysis
21	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

400 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Carb [%]	10 Nannos [%]	11 Foram [%]	12 Rad [%]	13 Diatoms [%]	14 Comp indet [%]	15 Spiculae [%]	16 Min other [%]	17 Minerals [%]	18 Zeo [%]	19 Clay min [%]	20 Glt [%]	21 Volc glass [%]
0.52	6-47-1-1,52	49	41	10	Pleistocene	FORAM NANNO MARL OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	40	30	6	5	1	5	0	1	0	10	0	2
0.68	6-47-1-1,68	33	52	15	Pleistocene	FORAM SILIC NANNO MARL OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	42	12	4	4	0	4	0	17	0	14	0	3
1.02	6-47-1-11,102	37	43	20	Pleistocene	FORAM DIAT MARL OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	40	15	5	10	0	5	0	3	0	20	0	2
1.70	6-47-1-2,20	42	47	10	Pleistocene	FORAM NANNO CHALK OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	45	30	4	5	0	3	3	0	0	10	0	1
1.83	6-47-1-2,33	40	50	10	Pleistocene	FORAM SILIC NANNO CHALK OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	50	15	5	10	0	5	3	0	0	10	0	2
2.82	6-47-1-21,132	54	31	15	Pleistocene	FORAM NANNO SILIC MARL OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	30	30	5	7	0	8	3	0	1	15	0	1
3.11	6-47-1-3,11	30	15	55	Pleistocene	SANDY FORAM NANNO CHALK OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	35	29	4	6	0	0	17	0	0	0	0	9
3.47	6-47-1-3,47	20	15	65	Pleistocene	SANDY FORAM NANNO CHALK OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	50	18	8	12	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2
3.54	6-47-1-3,54	15	30	55	Pleistocene	SANDY FORAM NANNO CHALK OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	30	26	6	13	5	1	18	0	0	0	0	1
3.60	6-47-1-3,60	15	29	65	Pleistocene	SANDY FORAM NANNO CHALK OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	45	22	4	11	0	2	18	0	0	0	0	0
4.47	6-47-1-31,147	10	15	75	Pleistocene	SANDY FORAM NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	60	13	5	7	0	0	15	0	0	0	0	0
4.60	6-47-1-4,10	10	10	80	Pleistocene	FORAM NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	60	3	8	12	0	3	0	0	0	10	2	0
5.00	6-47-1-4,50	10	15	75	Pleistocene	FORAM NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	60	8	7	9	0	1	0	0	0	10	0	0
5.50	6-47-1-41,100	20	20	60	Pleistocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE (CHALK)	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	45	16	4	8	0	1	6	0	0	10	0	10
5.96	6-47-1-41,146	10	15	75	Pleistocene	NANNO CHALK OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	5	5	0	1	5	0	0	10	0	0
6.10	6-47-1-5,10	10	15	75	Pleistocene	NANNO CHALK OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	3	48	5	5	9	0	1	17	0	0	12	0	0
6.50	6-47-1-5,50	5	10	85	Pleistocene	NANNO CHALK OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	70	4	3	7	0	2	0	0	0	10	0	0
7.00	6-47-1-51,100	5	10	85	Pleistocene	NANNO CHALK OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	1	70	4	5	10	0	3	2	0	0	4	0	0
7.40	6-47-1-51,140	5	5	90	Pleistocene	NANNO CHALK OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	80	2	6	5	0	0	1	0	0	4	0	0
8.25	6-47-1-6,75	10	15	75	Pleistocene	NANNO CHALK OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	3	55	5	5	6	1	1	8	0	0	10	0	6