Citation:

PANGAEA.230845

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Zakariadze, Guram S; Usher, John L; Theyer, Fritz; Sartori, Renzo; Rodolfo, Kelvin S; Mattey, David P; Martini, Erlend; Keating, Barbara; Ishii, Teruaki; Heiman, M E; Chotin, Pierre; Brassell, Simon C; Balshaw, K M; Kroenke, Loren W; Scott, R (1981): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, LIX, 1020 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.59.1981

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 16.341000 * Longitude: 134.874200

Date/Time Start: 1978-02-13T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1978-02-13T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.40 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 290.39 m

Event(s):

59-448A * Latitude: 16.341000 * Longitude: 134.874200 * Date/Time: 1978-02-13T00:00:00 * Elevation: -3483.0 m * Penetration: 914 m * Recovery: 226.7 m * Location: North Pacific/Philippine Sea/RIDGE * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 66 cores; 704.5 m cored; 0 m drilled; 32.2 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Quartz	Qz	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Feldspar	Fsp	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Zeolite	Zeo	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Mica	Mica	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
20	Glauconite	Glt	%	Smear slide analysis
21	Iron	Fe	%	Smear slide analysis
22	Heavy minerals	HM	%	Smear slide analysis
23	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis
24	Rock fragments	Rock fragm	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

850 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Carb [%]	10 Nannos [%]	11 Foram [%]	12 Rad [%]	13 Diatoms [%]	14 Spiculae [%]	15 Qz [%]	16 Fsp [%]	17 Zeo [%]	18 Mica [%]	19 Clay min [%]	20 Glt [%]	21 Fe [%]	22 HM [%]	23 Volc glass [%]	24 Rock fragm [%]
0.40	59-448A-1-1,40	0	95	5	Middle miocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	90	0	0	0	0	2	2	2	0	1	2	3	0	2	0
1.39	59-448A-1-11,139	3	87	10	Middle miocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	15	76	2	0	0	0	0	0	2	0	1	0	2	0	3	0
4.30	59-448A-1-31,130	0	90	10	Middle miocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	10	85	3	0	0	0	0	2	0	0	2	0	0	0	2	0
7.21	59-448A-1-51,121	2	90	8	Middle miocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	22	74	1	0	0	0	1	1	0	0	2	0	2	0	0	0
8.86	59-448A-1-61,136	10	85	5	Middle miocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	79	4	8	0	3	0	1	0	0	2	0	2	0	0	0
33.55	59-448A-2-1,5	18	72	10	Lower miocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	5	71	10	2	1	4	0	0	0	0	2	0	4	0	1	0
34.90	59-448A-2-11,140	20	70	10	Lower miocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	2	71	10	2	6	4	0	0	0	0	2	1	2	0	0	0
38.81	59-448A-2-4,81	23	69	8	Lower miocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	3	64	12	1	7	1	0	1	0	0	3	0	8	0	0	0
42.30	59-448A-2-61,130	17	75	8	Lower miocene	FORAMINIFERAL-NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	1	63	15	2	10	2	0	0	0	0	2	0	5	0	0	0
42.92	59-448A-2-7,42	50	45	5	Lower miocene	VOLC.GLASS--BEARING FORAM-NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	5	49	20	2	1	2	0	1	0	0	0	0	8	1	15	0
62.06	59-448A-3-1,6	10	85	5	Lower miocene	DIATOMACEOUS NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	0	70	8	1	12	2	0	0	0	0	3	0	3	0	1	0
63.40	59-448A-3-11,140	20	72	8	Lower miocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	1	72	7	10	3	2	0	0	0	0	2	0	3	0	0	0
66.40	59-448A-3-31,140	13	82	5	Lower miocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	73	8	6	4	1	0	0	0	0	1	2	2	0	0	0
69.40	59-448A-3-51,140	10	70	20	Lower miocene	VOLCANIC ASH RICH NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	15	30	1	1	2	0	0	5	0	0	10	0	5	0	31	0
70.90	59-448A-3-61,140	14	76	10	Lower miocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	5	76	8	6	3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0
72.74	59-448A-4-11,124	19	73	8	Upper oligocene	RADIOLARIA BEARING NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	3	60	6	10	2	2	0	3	0	5	1	2	3	0	5	0
72.90	59-448A-4-11,140	8	77	15	Upper oligocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	79	6	7	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	4	0	0	0
75.70	59-448A-4-31,120	10	85	5	Upper oligocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	78	0	5	5	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	5	0	0	0
76.39	59-448A-4-4,39	5	80	15	Upper oligocene	VOLCANIC ASH-RICH NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	1	45	2	1	2	0	1	6	2	0	0	2	3	2	43	0
77.40	59-448A-4-41,140	14	76	10	Upper oligocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	1	83	5	8	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0
80.40	59-448A-4-61,140	15	75	10	Upper oligocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	80	7	8	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0
223.60	59-448A-5-1,10	0	50	50	Oligocene	VOLCANIC TUFF	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	4	2	0	0	0	0	0	3	0	10	15	0	1	0	64	0
223.83	59-448A-5-1,33	10	50	40	Oligocene	VOLCANIC TUFF	Minor lithology; relative abundance	4	5	0	0	0	2	0	2	2	0	2	2	0	0	85	0
223.85	59-448A-5-1,35	50	50	0	Oligocene	VOLCANIC TUFF AND LAPILLI	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	3	0	0	0	0	0	0	15	2	0	0	2	5	2	58	15
224.12	59-448A-5-CC,16	0	70	30	Oligocene	VOLCANIC TUFF	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	20	0	5	0	0	0	3	65	5
252.39	59-448A-6-1,39	5	80	15	Middle oligocene	VOLC. TUFF-BEARING NANNOFOSSIL CHALK	Minor lithology; relative abundance	27	50	0	0	2	0	0	3	2	0	0	2	0	0	18	0
253.20	59-448A-6-11,120	0	95	5	Middle oligocene	VOLCANIC TUFF	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	3	5	0	0	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	3	0	89	0
254.90	59-448A-6-21,140	0	95	5	Middle oligocene	VOLCANIC TUFF	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	3	8	0	0	0	2	0	1	0	2	0	0	0	0	88	0
255.56	59-448A-6-3,56	2	90	8	Middle oligocene	NANNOFOSSIL CHALK	Minor lithology; relative abundance	5	89	2	3	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0
262.58	59-448A-7-11,108	2	90	8	Middle oligocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	86	1	0	0	1	0	3	0	0	0	2	0	2	5	0
262.70	59-448A-7-11,120	0	95	5	Middle oligocene	NANNOFOSSIL-BEARING VOLCANIC TUFF	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	15	0	0	0	0	0	10	0	0	5	2	0	0	70	0
267.93	59-448A-7-5,43	0	95	5	Middle oligocene	NANNOFOSSIL CHALK	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	88	0	0	0	3	0	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	5	0
270.25	59-448A-7-61,125	1	95	4	Middle oligocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	3	91	0	0	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	0	2	0	3	0
271.83	59-448A-8-1,83	0	60	40	Middle oligocene	NANNOFOSSIL-BEARING VOLCANIC TUFF	Minor lithology; relative abundance	3	20	0	0	0	0	0	3	2	2	0	0	1	0	71	0
279.65	59-448A-8-61,115	2	90	8	Middle oligocene	NANNOFOSSIL CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	3	90	0	1	0	1	0	3	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0
279.78	59-448A-8-61,128	10	70	20	Middle oligocene	NANNO-BEARING VOLC. TUFF	Minor lithology; relative abundance	10	20	0	0	0	0	0	6	2	0	0	2	0	1	63	0
290.39	59-448A-10-1,39	5	90	5		VOLC TUFF RICH (TUFFACEOUS?) NANNOCHALK	relative abundance	0	63	4	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	33	0