Citation:

PANGAEA.230804

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Lynts, George W; Bukry, David; Barron, John A; Warren, Nick; Srivastava, R K; Schrader, Ed L; Roggenthen, William; Petersen, Nikolai P; Natland, James H; Mattey, David P; Humphris, Susan E; Hoffert, Michel; Goll, Robert M; Fodor, R; Dmitriev, Yuri I; Briqueu, Louis; Rosendahl, Bruce R; Hekinian, Roger (1980): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, LIV, 957 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.54.1980

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 8.113200 * Longitude: -104.605800

Date/Time Start: 1977-06-04T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1977-06-04T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.75 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 126.40 m

Event(s):

54-427 * Latitude: 8.113200 * Longitude: -104.605800 * Date/Time: 1977-06-04T00:00:00 * Elevation: -3834.0 m * Penetration: 174.5 m * Recovery: 57.3 m * Location: North Pacific/TROUGH * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 11 cores; 98.5 m cored; 0 m drilled; 58.1 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Silicoflagellates	Silicoflag	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Pyrite, FeS2	Py	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Iron	Fe	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Manganese	Mn	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

738 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Nannos [%]	10 Foram [%]	11 Rad [%]	12 Diatoms [%]	13 Silicoflag [%]	14 Spiculae [%]	15 Clay min [%]	16 Py [%]	17 Fe [%]	18 Volc glass [%]	19 Mn [%]
0.75	54-427-1-1,75	20	80	Upper pleistocene	MARLY FORAM NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	40	30	2	0	2	0	30	0	0	2	0
2.30	54-427-1-2,80	20	80	Upper pleistocene	MARLY FORAM NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	50	25	2	2	2	2	25	2	0	2	2
4.40	54-427-2-1,90	30	70	Upper pleistocene	MARLY FORAM NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	40	20	5	10	2	2	25	0	0	2	0
5.75	54-427-2-2,75	20	80	Upper pleistocene	SILICEOUS NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	40	15	5	15	2	2	25	0	0	0	0
7.25	54-427-2-3,75	20	80	Upper pleistocene	MARLY FORAM NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	40	25	5	10	2	2	20	2	0	2	2
8.10	54-427-2-4,10	50	50	Upper pleistocene	CALCAREOUS CLAY(?)	relative abundance	20	20	2	0	0	0	60	0	2	0	0
9.00	54-427-2-41,100	20	80	Upper pleistocene	MARLY FORAM NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	45	25	2	2	2	2	30	0	0	2	0
9.90	54-427-2-5,40	20	80	Upper pleistocene	MARLY FORAM NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	45	25	2	2	2	2	30	2	0	2	0
10.70	54-427-2-51,120	20	80	Upper pleistocene	MARLY FORAM NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	40	30	0	0	0	0	30	0	2	2	0
11.60	54-427-2-6,60	20	80	Upper pleistocene	MARLY FORAM NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	40	30	0	0	0	0	20	2	0	2	0
13.75	54-427-3-1,75	80	20	Upper pleistocene	CALCAREOUS SILICEOUS OOZE	relative abundance	20	10	20	20	2	5	25	2	0	2	0
15.25	54-427-3-2,75	80	20	Upper pleistocene	CALCAREOUS SILICEOUS OOZE	relative abundance	20	15	20	15	0	5	25	2	0	2	0
16.75	54-427-3-3,75	80	20	Upper pleistocene	CALCAREOUS SILICEOUS OOZE	relative abundance	20	10	15	30	2	5	20	2	0	2	0
32.75	54-427-4-1,75	70	30	Upper pleistocene	SILICEOUS NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	50	10	5	10	2	5	20	2	0	2	0
34.25	54-427-4-2,75	40	60	Upper pleistocene	SILICEOUS NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	50	10	5	10	2	2	25	0	0	2	0
35.75	54-427-4-3,75	0	0	Upper pleistocene	UNNAMED	relative abundance	50	15	5	10	2	2	20	2	0	2	0
51.10	54-427-5-CC,0	60	40	Upper pleistocene	DIATOM-NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	40	10	2	30	2	2	20	2	0	2	0
61.25	54-427-6-1,75	45	55	Upper pleistocene	MARLY FORAM-NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	55	15	5	5	2	2	20	2	0	2	0
61.68	54-427-6-11,118	40	60	Upper pleistocene	MARLY FORAM-NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	60	20	2	2	0	0	20	0	2	0	0
62.75	54-427-6-2,75	40	60	Upper pleistocene	MARLY FORAM-NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	60	10	2	2	0	0	30	2	0	2	0
64.90	54-427-6-31,140	30	70	Upper pleistocene	MARLY FORAM-NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	70	10	2	2	0	0	20	2	0	2	0
65.25	54-427-6-4,25	25	75	Upper pleistocene	MARLY FORAM-NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	75	10	2	2	0	2	15	2	0	2	0
65.85	54-427-6-4,85	60	40	Upper pleistocene	SILICEOUS NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	40	10	2	30	2	2	20	0	0	2	0
66.40	54-427-6-41,140	40	60	Upper pleistocene	MARLY FORAM-NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	60	20	2	2	0	0	20	2	0	2	0
90.00	54-427-7-11,100	40	60	Upper pleistocene	FORAM-NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	60	25	2	2	2	2	15	2	0	2	0
90.81	54-427-7-2,31	0	0	Upper pleistocene	PYRITE RICH DIATOM OOZE	relative abundance	10	0	2	90	0	2	2	0	0	2	0
91.25	54-427-7-2,75	60	40	Upper pleistocene	SILICEOUS NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	40	15	2	30	0	2	15	2	0	2	0
92.75	54-427-7-3,75	50	50	Upper pleistocene	SILICEOUS NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	50	15	10	10	2	2	15	2	0	2	0
93.25	54-427-7-31,125	50	50	Upper pleistocene	SILICEOUS NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	50	15	10	10	0	2	15	2	0	2	0
93.80	54-427-7-4,30	50	50	Upper pleistocene	SILICEOUS NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	50	10	2	20	2	2	20	2	0	2	0
94.05	54-427-7-4,55	0	0	Upper pleistocene	PYRITE RICH DIATOM OOZE	relative abundance	10	0	2	85	0	2	5	0	0	2	0
118.70	54-427-8-11,120	40	60	Lower pleistocene	FORAM-NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	60	20	2	2	0	2	20	2	0	2	0
119.55	54-427-8-2,55	35	65	Lower pleistocene	FORAM-NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	65	15	2	2	0	0	20	2	0	2	0
121.40	54-427-8-3,90	50	50	Lower pleistocene	FORAM-NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	50	25	2	2	0	2	25	2	0	2	0
122.98	54-427-8-4,98	0	0	Lower pleistocene	PYRITE RICH DIATOM OOZE	relative abundance	20	5	2	70	0	0	5	0	0	2	0
123.00	54-427-8-41,100	65	35	Lower pleistocene	SILICEOUS CALCAREOUS OOZE	relative abundance	35	20	5	20	0	0	15	5	0	2	0
123.06	54-427-8-41,106	0	0	Lower pleistocene	PYRITE RICH DIATOM OOZE	relative abundance	20	5	2	70	0	0	5	0	0	2	0
124.20	54-427-8-5,70	50	50	Lower pleistocene	FORAM-NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	50	30	2	2	0	0	20	2	0	2	0
125.60	54-427-8-6,60	50	50	Lower pleistocene	FORAM-NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	50	30	2	0	0	0	20	2	0	2	0
126.04	54-427-8-61,104	50	50	Lower pleistocene	FORAM-NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	50	20	5	5	2	2	20	2	0	2	0
126.40	54-427-8-61,140	40	60	Lower pleistocene	FORAM-NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	60	20	2	0	0	0	20	2	0	2	0