Citation:

PANGAEA.230798

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Lynts, George W; Bukry, David; Barron, John A; Warren, Nick; Srivastava, R K; Schrader, Ed L; Roggenthen, William; Petersen, Nikolai P; Natland, James H; Mattey, David P; Humphris, Susan E; Hoffert, Michel; Goll, Robert M; Fodor, R; Dmitriev, Yuri I; Briqueu, Louis; Rosendahl, Bruce R; Hekinian, Roger (1980): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, LIV, 957 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.54.1980

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 9.146800 * Longitude: -105.109500

Date/Time Start: 1977-05-15T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1977-05-15T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.10 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 36.25 m

Event(s):

54-423 * Latitude: 9.146800 * Longitude: -105.109500 * Date/Time: 1977-05-15T00:00:00 * Elevation: -3161.0 m * Penetration: 53.5 m * Recovery: 27.7 m * Location: North Pacific/SEDIMENT POND * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 7 cores; 49 m cored; 0 m drilled; 56.6 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Pyrite, FeS2	Py	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Iron	Fe	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

400 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Nannos [%]	10 Foram [%]	11 Rad [%]	12 Diatoms [%]	13 Spiculae [%]	14 Clay min [%]	15 Py [%]	16 Fe [%]	17 Volc glass [%]
0.10	54-423-1-1,10	0	50	50	Upper pleistocene	BROWN CALCAREOUS CLAY	relative abundance	30	10	2	2	2	50	0	10	2
1.00	54-423-1-11,100	0	80	10	Upper pleistocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	80	10	2	2	2	10	0	0	2
1.80	54-423-1-2,30	0	80	20	Upper pleistocene	PYRITE NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	55	5	2	2	2	20	20	0	2
2.70	54-423-1-21,120	5	75	20	Upper pleistocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	65	5	2	2	2	20	0	10	2
3.20	54-423-1-3,20	10	70	20	Upper pleistocene	BROWN CALCAREOUS CLAY	relative abundance	45	15	2	2	2	20	0	20	2
3.60	54-423-1-3,60	20	70	10	Upper pleistocene	FORAM NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	60	30	2	2	2	10	2	0	2
4.10	54-423-2-1,10	5	55	40	Upper pleistocene	BROWN CALCAREOUS CLAY	relative abundance	20	20	2	2	2	40	0	20	2
5.30	54-423-2-11,130	5	85	10	Upper pleistocene	SILICEOUS NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	60	10	10	10	2	10	0	0	2
6.25	54-423-2-2,75	5	85	10	Upper pleistocene	FORAM NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	75	15	2	2	2	10	0	0	2
7.40	54-423-2-3,40	5	85	10	Upper pleistocene	FORAM NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	60	20	5	5	2	10	2	0	2
8.00	54-423-2-31,100	0	70	30	Upper pleistocene	CALCAREOUS BROWN CLAY	relative abundance	40	20	2	2	2	30	0	10	2
13.80	54-423-3-1,30	5	85	10	Upper pleistocene	FORAM-NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	70	20	2	2	2	10	2	0	2
14.10	54-423-3-1,60	10	60	30	Upper pleistocene	BROWN CALCAREOUS CLAY	relative abundance	55	5	0	0	0	30	0	10	2
14.80	54-423-3-11,130	5	75	20	Upper pleistocene	FORAM NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	50	30	2	2	2	20	2	0	2
15.75	54-423-3-2,75	0	80	20	Upper pleistocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	70	5	2	2	2	20	5	0	2
17.25	54-423-3-3,75	0	80	20	Upper pleistocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	70	10	2	2	2	20	0	0	2
18.60	54-423-3-4,60	0	80	20	Upper pleistocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	65	10	5	2	2	20	0	0	2
20.10	54-423-3-5,60	0	80	20	Upper pleistocene	FORAM-NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	60	20	2	2	2	20	0	0	2
25.25	54-423-4-2,75	0	80	20	Upper pleistocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	75	5	5	2	2	20	5	0	2
26.75	54-423-4-3,75	0	80	20	Upper pleistocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	20	10	2	2	2	20	2	0	2
28.25	54-423-4-4,75	0	80	20	Upper pleistocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	70	10	2	2	2	20	2	0	2
29.75	54-423-4-5,75	0	80	20	Upper pleistocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	70	10	2	2	2	20	0	0	2
33.25	54-423-5-1,75	0	95	5	Upper pleistocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	20	5	2	2	2	5	0	0	2
34.75	54-423-5-2,75	0	90	10	Upper pleistocene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	80	10	2	2	2	10	0	0	2
36.25	54-423-5-3,75	0	80	20	Upper pleistocene	FORAM NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	relative abundance	65	15	2	2	2	20	2	0	2