Citation:

PANGAEA.230776

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Milow, E Dean; Goll, Robert M; Olsson, Richard K; von der Borch, Christopher C; Vallier, Tracy L; Weser, Oscar E; Burns, Robert E; McManus, Dean A (1970): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, V, 827 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.5.1970

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 19.854200 * Longitude: -140.048000

Date/Time Start: 1969-05-23T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1969-05-23T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 1.00 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 34.60 m

Event(s):

5-41 * Latitude: 19.854200 * Longitude: -140.048000 * Date/Time: 1969-05-23T00:00:00 * Elevation: -5339.0 m * Penetration: 34.1 m * Recovery: 25.7 m * Location: North Pacific/HILL * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 5 cores; 34.1 m cored; 0 m drilled; 75.4 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Minerals, other	Min other	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Zeolite	Zeo	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Micronodules	Micronod	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

388 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Rad [%]	10 Diatoms [%]	11 Spiculae [%]	12 Min other [%]	13 Zeo [%]	14 Clay min [%]	15 Volc glass [%]	16 Micronod [%]
1.00	5-41-1-11,100	0	50	50	Neogene	ZEOLITIC CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	50	50	0	0
1.32	5-41-1-11,132	0	40	60	Neogene	ZEOLITIC CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	40	60	0	0
3.51	5-41-1-3,51	0	60	40	Neogene	ZEOLITIC RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	10	50	40	0	0
4.10	5-41-1-31,110	0	45	55	Neogene	ZEOLITIC RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	10	35	55	0	0
5.25	5-41-1-4,75	0	25	75	Neogene	ZEOLITE BEARING RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	0	0	15	10	75	0	0
6.50	5-41-1-5,50	0	20	80	Upper eocene	ZEOLITE BEARING RED CLAY	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	10	10	80	2	23
7.00	5-41-1-51,100	0	15	85	Upper eocene	RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	10	5	85	0	6
8.25	5-41-1-6,75	0	10	90	Upper eocene	RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	0	0	5	5	90	0	0
9.10	5-41-1-CC,0	0	40	60	Upper eocene	ZEOLITIC RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	10	30	60	0	0
9.75	5-41-2-1,75	0	45	55	Upper eocene	ZEOLITIC RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	5	40	55	0	0
10.20	5-41-2-11,120	0	40	60	Upper eocene	ZEOLITIC RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	5	35	60	0	0
11.10	5-41-2-2,60	0	45	55	Upper eocene	ZEOLITIC RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	5	40	55	2	0
11.69	5-41-2-21,119	0	45	55	Upper eocene	ZEOLITIC RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	5	40	55	0	0
12.75	5-41-2-3,75	0	25	75	Upper eocene	ZEOLITE BEARING RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	5	20	75	0	0
14.25	5-41-2-4,75	0	45	55	Upper eocene	ZEOLITIC RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	5	40	55	0	0
15.10	5-41-2-CC,0	0	35	65	Upper eocene	ZEOLITIC RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	5	30	65	0	0
19.50	5-41-3-11,150	60	25	15	Upper eocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	85	2	2	0	0	15	0	0
21.00	5-41-3-21,150	50	20	30	Upper eocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	70	0	0	0	0	30	0	0
22.50	5-41-3-31,150	40	40	20	Middle eocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	75	0	0	0	0	20	0	0
22.60	5-41-3-CC,0	0	15	5	Middle eocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	90	0	0	5	10	5	0	0
22.60	5-41-3-CC,0	45	50	85	Middle eocene	RED CLAY	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	0	85	0	0
30.00	5-41-4-21,150	50	35	15	Middle eocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	80	0	0	0	0	15	0	0
31.50	5-41-4-31,150	48	37	15	Middle eocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	75	0	0	0	0	15	0	0
33.00	5-41-4-41,150	50	40	10	Middle eocene	RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	90	0	0	0	0	10	0	0
34.50	5-41-4-51,150	50	45	5		RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	90	0	0	0	0	5	0	0
34.60	5-41-4-CC,0	50	45	5		RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	90	0	0	0	0	5	0	0