Citation:

PANGAEA.230774

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Milow, E Dean; Goll, Robert M; Olsson, Richard K; von der Borch, Christopher C; Vallier, Tracy L; Weser, Oscar E; Burns, Robert E; McManus, Dean A (1970): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, V, 827 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.5.1970

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 32.804700 * Longitude: -139.571500

Date/Time Start: 1969-05-15T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1969-05-15T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 1.20 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 17.68 m

Event(s):

5-39 * Latitude: 32.804700 * Longitude: -139.571500 * Date/Time: 1969-05-15T00:00:00 * Elevation: -4929.0 m * Penetration: 17 m * Recovery: 16.5 m * Location: North Pacific/HILL * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 2 cores; 17 m cored; 0 m drilled; 97.1 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Minerals, other	Min other	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Zeolite	Zeo	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Iron	Fe	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Micronodules	Micronod	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

463 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Carb [%]	10 Nannos [%]	11 Foram [%]	12 Min other [%]	13 Zeo [%]	14 Clay min [%]	15 Fe [%]	16 Volc glass [%]	17 Micronod [%]
1.20	5-39-1-11,120	50	50	Neogene	ZEOLITIC CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	2	20	40	50	0	2	1
2.00	5-39-1-2,50	35	65	Neogene	ZEOLITE-BEARING CLAYEY MUD	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	15	20	65	0	2	0
2.60	5-39-1-21,110	45	55	Neogene	ZEOLITIC CLAYEY MUD (RED)?	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	10	30	55	0	5	0
2.90	5-39-1-21,140	50	50	Neogene	ZEOLITIC RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	10	40	50	0	2	0
3.50	5-39-1-3,50	30	70	Neogene	ZEOLITE-BEARING RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	10	20	70	0	0	0
3.75	5-39-1-3,75	40	60	Neogene	ZEOLITIC RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	10	30	60	0	0	0
4.40	5-39-1-31,140	60	40	Neogene	ZEOLITE RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	10	50	40	0	0	0
4.80	5-39-1-4,30	35	65	Neogene	ZEOLITIC RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	2	0	10	25	65	0	0	0
5.50	5-39-1-41,100	40	60	Neogene	ZEOLITIC RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	5	35	60	0	0	0
5.84	5-39-1-41,134	20	80	Neogene	ZEOLITE-BEARING RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	10	10	80	0	2	0
5.94	5-39-1-41,144	40	60	Neogene	ZEOLITIC RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	10	30	60	0	0	0
6.46	5-39-1-5,46	55	45	Neogene	DEVITRIFIED VOLCANIC ASH (?)	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	5	50	45	0	0	0
7.20	5-39-1-51,120	20	80	Neogene	ZEOLITE-BEARING RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	10	10	80	0	0	0
7.45	5-39-1-51,145	40	60	Neogene	RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	20	20	60	0	0	0
7.90	5-39-1-6,40	30	70	Neogene	ZEOLITE-BEARING RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	20	10	70	0	0	0
8.50	5-39-1-61,100	50	50	Neogene	ZEOLITE-BEARING RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	40	10	50	0	2	0
9.90	5-39-2-1,90	40	60	Neogene	ZEOLITE-BEARING RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	35	5	60	1	0	0
10.10	5-39-2-11,110	35	65	Neogene	ZEOLITIC RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	5	30	65	0	2	0
11.00	5-39-2-2,50	30	70	Neogene	ZEOLITE-BEARING RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	10	20	70	0	2	0
11.60	5-39-2-21,110	40	60	Neogene	HEMATITE-RICH ZEOLITE-BEARING RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	35	5	60	0	0	0
11.85	5-39-2-21,135	25	75	Neogene	ZEOLITE-BEARING RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	20	5	75	0	0	0
13.00	5-39-2-31,100	30	70	Neogene	RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	30	2	70	0	0	0
13.60	5-39-2-4,10	55	45	Neogene	RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	5	45	50	0	0
14.10	5-39-2-4,60	55	45	Neogene	RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	5	2	45	50	0	0
14.55	5-39-2-41,105	25	75	Lower eocene	ZEOLITE-BEARING RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	20	5	75	0	0	0
15.75	5-39-2-5,75	50	50	Lower eocene	RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	0	50	50	0	0
16.30	5-39-2-51,130	20	80	Lower eocene	RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	20	2	80	0	0	0
17.00	5-39-2-6,50	30	70	Lower eocene	RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	30	0	70	0	0	0
17.68	5-39-2-61,118	32	68		NANNOFOSSIL-BEARING RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	12	5	0	20	0	63	0	0	0