McManus, Dean A; Burns, Robert E (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 5-38 [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.230773
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Related to:
DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM
Milow, E Dean; Goll, Robert M; Olsson, Richard K; von der Borch, Christopher C; Vallier, Tracy L; Weser, Oscar E; Burns, Robert E; McManus, Dean A (1970): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, V, 827 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.5.1970
Further details:
Project(s):
Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)
Coverage:
Latitude: 38.702000 * Longitude: -140.354500
Date/Time Start: 1969-05-12T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1969-05-12T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 1.50 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 47.30 m
Event(s):
5-38 * Latitude: 38.702000 * Longitude: -140.354500 * Date/Time: 1969-05-12T00:00:00 * Elevation: -5137.0 m * Penetration: 48 m * Recovery: 47.4 m * Location: North Pacific/HILL * Campaign: Leg5 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 6 cores; 48 m cored; 0 m drilled; 98.8 % recovery
Parameter(s):
# | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DEPTH, sediment/rock | Depth sed | m | Geocode | ||
2 | Sample code/label | Sample label | DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation | |||
3 | Sand | Sand | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
4 | Silt | Silt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
5 | Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay | <2 µm | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
6 | Stratigraphy | Stratigraphy | Smear slide analysis | |||
7 | Lithology/composition/facies | Lithology | Smear slide analysis | |||
8 | Comment | Comment | Smear slide analysis | |||
9 | Nannofossils | Nannos | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
10 | Minerals, other | Min other | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
11 | Zeolite | Zeo | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
12 | Clay minerals | Clay min | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
13 | Iron | Fe | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
14 | Volcanic glass | Volc glass | % | Smear slide analysis |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
429 data points
Data
1 Depth sed [m] | 2 Sample label | 3 Sand [%] | 4 Silt [%] | 5 <2 µm [%] | 6 Stratigraphy | 7 Lithology | 8 Comment | 9 Nannos [%] | 10 Min other [%] | 11 Zeo [%] | 12 Clay min [%] | 13 Fe [%] | 14 Volc glass [%] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.50 | 5-38-1-2,0 | 0 | 20 | 80 | Neogene | ZEOLITE-BEARING RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 10 | 10 | 80 | 0 | 2 |
2.00 | 5-38-2-1,0 | 0 | 20 | 80 | Neogene | ZEOLITE-BEARING RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 10 | 80 | 0 | 0 |
3.50 | 5-38-2-2,0 | 0 | 30 | 70 | Neogene | ZEOLITE-BEARING RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 20 | 70 | 0 | 0 |
5.42 | 5-38-2-3,42 | 0 | 30 | 70 | Neogene | ZEOLITE-BEARING RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 5 | 25 | 70 | 0 | 0 |
5.70 | 5-38-2-3,70 | 0 | 25 | 75 | Neogene | ZEOLITE-BEARING RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 5 | 20 | 75 | 0 | 0 |
7.25 | 5-38-2-4,75 | 0 | 10 | 90 | Neogene | RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 10 | 90 | 0 | 0 |
9.10 | 5-38-1-CC,0 | 0 | 20 | 80 | Neogene | ZEOLITE-BEARING RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 10 | 80 | 0 | 0 |
10.05 | 5-38-2-6,55 | 0 | 15 | 85 | Neogene | ZEOLITE-BEARING RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 15 | 85 | 1 | 0 |
13.15 | 5-38-3-11,115 | 0 | 90 | 10 | Neogene | DEVITRIFIED VOLCANIC ASH | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 10 | 80 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
13.51 | 5-38-3-2,1 | 0 | 15 | 85 | Neogene | ZEOLITE-BEARING RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 15 | 85 | 0 | 0 |
15.20 | 5-38-3-3,20 | 0 | 10 | 90 | Neogene | ZEOLITE-BEARING RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 10 | 90 | 0 | 0 |
16.85 | 5-38-3-4,35 | 0 | 95 | 5 | Neogene | DEVITRIFIED VOLCANIC ASH (PHILIPSITE) | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 5 | 90 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
17.75 | 5-38-3-41,125 | 0 | 10 | 90 | Neogene | ZEOLITE-BEARING RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 10 | 90 | 0 | 0 |
18.50 | 5-38-3-5,50 | 0 | 25 | 75 | Neogene | ZEOLITE-BEARING RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 10 | 15 | 75 | 0 | 0 |
18.90 | 5-38-3-5,90 | 0 | 80 | 20 | Neogene | DEVITRIFIED VOLCANIC ASH (PHILIPSITE) | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 10 | 70 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
20.60 | 5-38-3-61,110 | 0 | 30 | 70 | Neogene | ZEOLITE-BEARING RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 10 | 20 | 70 | 0 | 0 |
23.25 | 5-38-4-2,75 | 0 | 10 | 90 | Neogene | RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 5 | 5 | 90 | 0 | 0 |
24.75 | 5-38-4-3,75 | 0 | 15 | 85 | Neogene | ZEOLITE-BEARING RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 5 | 10 | 85 | 0 | 0 |
26.40 | 5-38-4-4,90 | 0 | 10 | 90 | Neogene | ZEOLITE-BEARING RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 10 | 90 | 0 | 0 |
27.85 | 5-38-4-5,85 | 0 | 15 | 85 | Neogene | ZEOLITE-BEARING RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 5 | 10 | 85 | 0 | 0 |
29.00 | 5-38-4-6,50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Neogene | VOLCANIC ASH | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
30.75 | 5-38-5-1,75 | 0 | 5 | 95 | Neogene | RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 5 | 95 | 0 | 0 |
30.90 | 5-38-5-1,90 | 0 | 5 | 95 | Neogene | RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 5 | 95 | 0 | 0 |
33.90 | 5-38-5-3,90 | 0 | 2 | 98 | Neogene | RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 2 | 2 | 98 | 0 | 0 |
37.30 | 5-38-5-51,130 | 0 | 2 | 98 | Neogene | RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 2 | 2 | 98 | 0 | 0 |
39.06 | 5-38-6-1,6 | 0 | 70 | 30 | Lower eocene | RED CLAY NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 70 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 |
39.80 | 5-38-6-1,80 | 0 | 70 | 30 | Lower eocene | RED CLAY NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 70 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 |
40.50 | 5-38-6-11,150 | 0 | 65 | 35 | Lower eocene | RED CLAY NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 65 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 0 | 0 |
42.00 | 5-38-6-21,150 | 0 | 65 | 35 | Lower eocene | RED CLAY NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 65 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 0 | 0 |
44.62 | 5-38-6-41,112 | 0 | 90 | 10 | Lower eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 90 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
45.00 | 5-38-6-41,150 | 0 | 60 | 40 | Lower eocene | NANNO OOZE (FERRUG) | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 40 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
46.50 | 5-38-6-51,150 | 0 | 50 | 50 | Lower eocene | NANNO OOZE (FERRUG) | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 50 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
47.30 | 5-38-6-6,80 | 0 | 65 | 35 | Lower eocene | RED CLAY NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 65 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 0 | 0 |