Citation:

PANGAEA.230752

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Montadert, Lucien; Roberts, David G; Auffret, Gérard A; Bock, W D; Dupeuble, P A; Hailwood, Ernie A; Harrison, William E; Kagami, H; Lumsden, D N; Müller, C M; Schnitker, Detmar; Thompson, T L; Timofeev, Pyotr P (1979): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. U. S. Government Printing Office, XLVIII, 1183 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.48.1979

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods. hdl:10013/epic.32353.d001

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 47.874700 * Longitude: -8.840700

Date/Time Start: 1976-06-11T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1976-06-11T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.33 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 132.96 m

Event(s):

48-402 * Latitude: 47.874700 * Longitude: -8.840700 * Date/Time: 1976-06-11T00:00:00 * Elevation: -2339.0 m * Penetration: 137 m * Recovery: 12 m * Location: North Atlantic/SLOPE * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 5 cores; 42 m cored; 0 m drilled; 28.6 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Dolomite	Dol	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Algae	Algae	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Quartz	Qz	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Feldspar	Fsp	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Mica	Mica	%	Smear slide analysis
20	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
21	Glauconite	Glt	%	Smear slide analysis
22	Pyrite, FeS2	Py	%	Smear slide analysis
23	Iron	Fe	%	Smear slide analysis
24	Heavy minerals	HM	%	Smear slide analysis
25	Tourmaline	Tur	%	Smear slide analysis
26	Hornblende	Hbl	%	Smear slide analysis
27	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis
28	Rock fragments	Rock fragm	%	Smear slide analysis
29	Terrigenous	Terr	%	Smear slide analysis	terrigeneous detritus

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

448 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Carb [%]	10 Dol [%]	11 Nannos [%]	12 Foram [%]	14 Rad [%]	15 Diatoms [%]	16 Spiculae [%]	17 Qz [%]	18 Fsp [%]	19 Mica [%]	20 Clay min [%]	21 Glt [%]	22 Py [%]	23 Fe [%]	24 HM [%]	25 Tur [%]	26 Hbl [%]	27 Volc glass [%]	28 Rock fragm [%]	29 Terr [%]
0.33	48-402-1-1,33	25	35	40	Pleistocene	MARLY FORAMNANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	22	2	25	15	0	0	2	20	2	0	15	2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	37
0.55	48-402-1-1,55	3	40	57	Pleistocene	CALCAREOUS MUD	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	15	2	2	2	0	1	2	15	0	1	64	2	1	0	0	0	1	0	0	0
2.37	48-402-1-2,87	0	40	60	Pleistocene	CALCAREOUS MUD	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	10	1	2	0	0	2	0	20	0	2	63	0	1	2	1	0	0	0	0	0
4.70	48-402-1-CC,0	0	0	0	Pleistocene	MARLY FORAMNANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	2	0	0	9	0	0	0	0	0	2	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	2	0
42.76	48-402-2-1,76	10	35	55	Pleistocene	CALCAREOUS MUD	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	15	1	3	3	0	0	0	25	0	0	50	1	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
43.00	48-402-2-CC,0	0	0	0	Pleistocene	CALCAREOUS MUD	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	2	0	8	0	0	0	85	0	1	0	2	0	2	0	0	2	0	0	0
81.10	48-402-3-11,110	30	45	25	Pleistocene	CALCAREOUS MUD	Minor lithology; relative abundance	5	2	10	10	0	0	2	57	2	0	15	2	2	0	1	0	0	0	0	75
81.20	48-402-3-11,120	50	20	30	Pleistocene	MARLY FORAM NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	10	0	20	30	0	0	0	28	2	0	10	1	2	0	2	0	0	0	0	40
81.30	48-402-3-11,130	15	35	50	Pleistocene	MARLY NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	3	0	35	15	0	0	2	10	0	1	33	1	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	45
81.49	48-402-3-11,149	15	30	55	Pleistocene	MARLY NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	0	35	15	0	0	2	10	0	1	35	1	1	1	0	1	0	0	0	47
81.60	48-402-3-CC,0	0	0	0	Pleistocene	MARLY NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	3	1	0	10	0	0	1	78	0	0	0	2	0	3	0	0	0	1	0	0
118.10	48-402-4-CC,0	0	0	0	Upper eocene	MARLY NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	5	2	35	55	0	1	30	5	0	0	49	3	0	3	0	0	0	0	0	54
118.10	48-402-4-CC,0	0	20	80	Upper eocene	MARLY NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	0	0	5	9	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
127.86	48-402-5-1,36	0	40	60	Upper eocene	SILICEOUS MARLY NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	20	0	25	3	3	0	10	7	0	0	31	1	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	38
132.72	48-402-5-4,72	0	30	70	Upper eocene	SILICEOUS MARLY NANNO CHALK	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	25	0	15	3	2	0	10	5	0	0	39	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	44
132.96	48-402-5-CC,0	0	0	0	Upper eocene	SILICEOUS MARLY NANNO CHALK	Minor lithology; relative abundance	3	2	0	40	5	0	41	10	0	2	0	1	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0