Montadert, Lucien; Roberts, David G (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 48-402 [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.230752
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Related to:
DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM
Montadert, Lucien; Roberts, David G; Auffret, Gérard A; Bock, W D; Dupeuble, P A; Hailwood, Ernie A; Harrison, William E; Kagami, H; Lumsden, D N; Müller, C M; Schnitker, Detmar; Thompson, T L; Timofeev, Pyotr P (1979): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. U. S. Government Printing Office, XLVIII, 1183 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.48.1979
Further details:
Processed smear slide data base - background and methods. hdl:10013/epic.32353.d001
Project(s):
Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)
Coverage:
Latitude: 47.874700 * Longitude: -8.840700
Date/Time Start: 1976-06-11T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1976-06-11T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.33 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 132.96 m
Event(s):
48-402 * Latitude: 47.874700 * Longitude: -8.840700 * Date/Time: 1976-06-11T00:00:00 * Elevation: -2339.0 m * Penetration: 137 m * Recovery: 12 m * Location: North Atlantic/SLOPE * Campaign: Leg48 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 5 cores; 42 m cored; 0 m drilled; 28.6 % recovery
Parameter(s):
# | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DEPTH, sediment/rock | Depth sed | m | Geocode | ||
2 | Sample code/label | Sample label | DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation | |||
3 | Sand | Sand | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
4 | Silt | Silt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
5 | Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay | <2 µm | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
6 | Stratigraphy | Stratigraphy | Smear slide analysis | |||
7 | Lithology/composition/facies | Lithology | Smear slide analysis | |||
8 | Comment | Comment | Smear slide analysis | |||
9 | Carbonates | Carb | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
10 | Dolomite | Dol | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
11 | Nannofossils | Nannos | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
12 | Foraminifera | Foram | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
13 | Algae | Algae | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
14 | Radiolarians | Rad | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
15 | Diatoms | Diatoms | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
16 | Spiculae | Spiculae | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
17 | Quartz | Qz | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
18 | Feldspar | Fsp | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
19 | Mica | Mica | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
20 | Clay minerals | Clay min | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
21 | Glauconite | Glt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
22 | Pyrite, FeS2 | Py | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
23 | Iron | Fe | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
24 | Heavy minerals | HM | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
25 | Tourmaline | Tur | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
26 | Hornblende | Hbl | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
27 | Volcanic glass | Volc glass | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
28 | Rock fragments | Rock fragm | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
29 | Terrigenous | Terr | % | Smear slide analysis | terrigeneous detritus |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
448 data points
Data
1 Depth sed [m] | 2 Sample label | 3 Sand [%] | 4 Silt [%] | 5 <2 µm [%] | 6 Stratigraphy | 7 Lithology | 8 Comment | 9 Carb [%] | 10 Dol [%] | 11 Nannos [%] | 12 Foram [%] | 13 Algae [%] | 14 Rad [%] | 15 Diatoms [%] | 16 Spiculae [%] | 17 Qz [%] | 18 Fsp [%] | 19 Mica [%] | 20 Clay min [%] | 21 Glt [%] | 22 Py [%] | 23 Fe [%] | 24 HM [%] | 25 Tur [%] | 26 Hbl [%] | 27 Volc glass [%] | 28 Rock fragm [%] | 29 Terr [%] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.33 | 48-402-1-1,33 | 25 | 35 | 40 | Pleistocene | MARLY FORAMNANNO OOZE | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 22 | 2 | 25 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37 |
0.55 | 48-402-1-1,55 | 3 | 40 | 57 | Pleistocene | CALCAREOUS MUD | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 15 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 64 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2.37 | 48-402-1-2,87 | 0 | 40 | 60 | Pleistocene | CALCAREOUS MUD | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 10 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 2 | 63 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4.70 | 48-402-1-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pleistocene | MARLY FORAMNANNO OOZE | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
42.76 | 48-402-2-1,76 | 10 | 35 | 55 | Pleistocene | CALCAREOUS MUD | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 15 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
43.00 | 48-402-2-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pleistocene | CALCAREOUS MUD | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 85 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
81.10 | 48-402-3-11,110 | 30 | 45 | 25 | Pleistocene | CALCAREOUS MUD | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 5 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 57 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 75 |
81.20 | 48-402-3-11,120 | 50 | 20 | 30 | Pleistocene | MARLY FORAM NANNO OOZE | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 10 | 0 | 20 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 |
81.30 | 48-402-3-11,130 | 15 | 35 | 50 | Pleistocene | MARLY NANNO OOZE | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 3 | 0 | 35 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 33 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 45 |
81.49 | 48-402-3-11,149 | 15 | 30 | 55 | Pleistocene | MARLY NANNO OOZE | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 35 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 35 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 47 |
81.60 | 48-402-3-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pleistocene | MARLY NANNO OOZE | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 3 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 78 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
118.10 | 48-402-4-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper eocene | MARLY NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 5 | 2 | 35 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 30 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 49 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 54 |
118.10 | 48-402-4-CC,0 | 0 | 20 | 80 | Upper eocene | MARLY NANNO OOZE | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
127.86 | 48-402-5-1,36 | 0 | 40 | 60 | Upper eocene | SILICEOUS MARLY NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 20 | 0 | 25 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 31 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38 |
132.72 | 48-402-5-4,72 | 0 | 30 | 70 | Upper eocene | SILICEOUS MARLY NANNO CHALK | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 25 | 0 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 39 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44 |
132.96 | 48-402-5-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper eocene | SILICEOUS MARLY NANNO CHALK | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 3 | 2 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 41 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |