Montadert, Lucien; Roberts, David G (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 48-401 [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.230751
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Related to:
DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM
Montadert, Lucien; Roberts, David G; Auffret, Gérard A; Bock, W D; Dupeuble, P A; Hailwood, Ernie A; Harrison, William E; Kagami, H; Lumsden, D N; Müller, C M; Schnitker, Detmar; Thompson, T L; Timofeev, Pyotr P (1979): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. U. S. Government Printing Office, XLVIII, 1183 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.48.1979
Further details:
Project(s):
Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)
Coverage:
Latitude: 47.427500 * Longitude: -8.810300
Date/Time Start: 1976-06-06T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1976-06-06T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.20 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 247.26 m
Event(s):
48-401 * Latitude: 47.427500 * Longitude: -8.810300 * Date/Time: 1976-06-06T00:00:00 * Elevation: -2495.0 m * Penetration: 341 m * Recovery: 103.1 m * Location: North Atlantic/TERRACE * Campaign: Leg48 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 24 cores; 228 m cored; 38 m drilled; 45.2 % recovery
Parameter(s):
# | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DEPTH, sediment/rock | Depth sed | m | Geocode | ||
2 | Sample code/label | Sample label | DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation | |||
3 | Sand | Sand | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
4 | Silt | Silt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
5 | Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay | <2 µm | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
6 | Stratigraphy | Stratigraphy | Smear slide analysis | |||
7 | Lithology/composition/facies | Lithology | Smear slide analysis | |||
8 | Comment | Comment | Smear slide analysis | |||
9 | Carbonates | Carb | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
10 | Dolomite | Dol | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
11 | Nannofossils | Nannos | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
12 | Foraminifera | Foram | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
13 | Ostracoda | Ostrac | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
14 | Radiolarians | Rad | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
15 | Diatoms | Diatoms | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
16 | Silicoflagellates | Silicoflag | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
17 | Spiculae | Spiculae | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
18 | Collophane | Collophane | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
19 | Quartz | Qz | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
20 | Feldspar | Fsp | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
21 | Mica | Mica | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
22 | Clay minerals | Clay min | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
23 | Glauconite | Glt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
24 | Opaque minerals | Opaque | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
25 | Pyrite, FeS2 | Py | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
26 | Iron | Fe | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
27 | Limonite | Lm | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
28 | Magnetite | Fe3O4 | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
29 | Heavy minerals | HM | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
30 | Organic matter | OM | % | Smear slide analysis | organic debris | |
31 | Terrigenous | Terr | % | Smear slide analysis | terrigeneous detritus |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
1559 data points
Data
1 Depth sed [m] | 2 Sample label | 3 Sand [%] | 4 Silt [%] | 5 <2 µm [%] | 6 Stratigraphy | 7 Lithology | 8 Comment | 9 Carb [%] | 10 Dol [%] | 11 Nannos [%] | 12 Foram [%] | 13 Ostrac [%] | 14 Rad [%] | 15 Diatoms [%] | 16 Silicoflag [%] | 17 Spiculae [%] | 18 Collophane [%] | 19 Qz [%] | 20 Fsp [%] | 21 Mica [%] | 22 Clay min [%] | 23 Glt [%] | 24 Opaque [%] | 25 Py [%] | 26 Fe [%] | 27 Lm [%] | 28 Fe3O4 [%] | 29 HM [%] | 30 OM [%] | 31 Terr [%] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.20 | 48-401-1-1,20 | 5 | 65 | 30 | Quaternary | FORAM MARLY CALCAREOUS OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 59 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 30 |
0.80 | 48-401-1-1,80 | 20 | 40 | 40 | Quaternary | MARLY CALCAREOUS OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 40 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 58 |
2.44 | 48-401-1-2,94 | 60 | 20 | 20 | Quaternary | SANDY MARLY CALCAREOUS OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 15 | 2 | 10 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 |
3.80 | 48-401-1-3,80 | 1 | 25 | 75 | Quaternary | CALCAREOUS MUD | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 2 | 1 | 61 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 88 |
8.40 | 48-401-1-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Quaternary | MUD | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 90 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
84.80 | 48-401-2-1,30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper eocene | NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 30 | 0 | 62 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
85.14 | 48-401-2-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper eocene | NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 92 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
94.15 | 48-401-3-1,15 | 3 | 30 | 67 | Upper eocene | NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 5 | 0 | 60 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26 |
94.45 | 48-401-3-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper eocene | NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 79 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
103.60 | 48-401-4-CC,0 | 5 | 75 | 20 | Upper eocene | SILICEOUS NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 15 | 0 | 60 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 |
103.60 | 48-401-4-CC,0 | 5 | 75 | 20 | Upper eocene | SILICEOUS NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
113.70 | 48-401-5-1,70 | 3 | 15 | 82 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 10 | 2 | 73 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 |
116.55 | 48-401-5-3,55 | 30 | 40 | 30 | Middle eocene | SANDY SILICEOUS NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 15 | 0 | 50 | 17 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 |
118.49 | 48-401-5-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 91 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
123.03 | 48-401-6-1,53 | 10 | 25 | 65 | Middle eocene | SILICEOUS NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 20 | 0 | 57 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 13 |
124.53 | 48-401-6-2,53 | 15 | 25 | 60 | Middle eocene | MARLY NANNO CHALK | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 5 | 0 | 48 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 |
128.15 | 48-401-6-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Middle eocene | SILICEOUS NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 70 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
132.30 | 48-401-7-1,30 | 2 | 68 | 30 | Middle eocene | SILICEOUS NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 10 | 0 | 62 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
137.20 | 48-401-7-4,70 | 2 | 68 | 30 | Middle eocene | SILICEOUS NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 5 | 0 | 67 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
140.65 | 48-401-7-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 95 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
143.48 | 48-401-8-2,48 | 2 | 78 | 20 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 3 | 2 | 75 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
147.07 | 48-401-8-41,107 | 2 | 0 | 40 | Middle eocene | SILICEOUS NANNO CHALK | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 5 | 0 | 61 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
151.88 | 48-401-9-1,88 | 1 | 79 | 20 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 10 | 0 | 77 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
159.96 | 48-401-9-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 65 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
166.00 | 48-401-10-41,100 | 10 | 25 | 65 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 5 | 0 | 66 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 |
170.12 | 48-401-10-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 72 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
171.30 | 48-401-11-11,130 | 5 | 20 | 75 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 5 | 2 | 65 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
173.75 | 48-401-11-3,75 | 3 | 87 | 10 | Lower eocene | NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 20 | 0 | 65 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
173.82 | 48-401-11-3,82 | 10 | 70 | 20 | Lower eocene | NANNO CHALK | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 50 | 0 | 30 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
174.30 | 48-401-11-31,130 | 7 | 20 | 73 | Lower eocene | MARLY ? NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 5 | 0 | 56 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
175.82 | 48-401-11-41,132 | 5 | 75 | 20 | Lower eocene | NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 60 | 2 | 23 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
176.70 | 48-401-11-5,70 | 1 | 0 | 40 | Lower eocene | MARLY NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 44 | 0 | 25 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 |
180.40 | 48-401-12-1,90 | 1 | 40 | 59 | Lower eocene | MARLY CALCAREOUS NANNO ? CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 42 | 0 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 42 |
186.00 | 48-401-12-5,50 | 1 | 15 | 85 | Lower eocene | CALCAREOUS CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 55 | 0 | 20 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 |
186.78 | 48-401-12-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower eocene | CALCAREOUS CHALK | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
190.90 | 48-401-13-2,40 | 3 | 30 | 67 | Lower eocene | NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 25 | 0 | 50 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 |
194.73 | 48-401-13-41,123 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower eocene | MUDSTONE | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 56 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
194.78 | 48-401-13-41,128 | 1 | 49 | 50 | Lower eocene | CALCAREOUS MUDSTONE | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 10 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 |
196.30 | 48-401-13-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper paleocene | MARLY CALCAREOUS CHALK | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 94 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
199.70 | 48-401-14-11,120 | 5 | 30 | 65 | Upper paleocene | MARLY NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 2 | 30 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
203.81 | 48-401-14-4,81 | 0 | 60 | 40 | Upper paleocene | NANNO CALCAREOUS CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 55 | 0 | 20 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35 |
205.27 | 48-401-14-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper paleocene | NANNO CALCAREOUS CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 80 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
210.00 | 48-401-15-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper paleocene | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 94 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
218.00 | 48-401-16-1,50 | 0 | 80 | 20 | Upper paleocene | NANNO CALCAREOUS CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 60 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
221.06 | 48-401-16-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower paleocene | NANNO CALCAREOUS CHALK | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 95 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
227.50 | 48-401-17-1,50 | 1 | 25 | 75 | Lower paleocene | NANNO CHALK | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 25 | 0 | 64 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
229.30 | 48-401-17-2,80 | 10 | 55 | 35 | Lower paleocene | FORAM CALCAREOUS CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 40 | 2 | 10 | 30 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
236.78 | 48-401-18-1,28 | 0 | 5 | 95 | Maestrichtian | NANNO CALCAREOUS CHALK | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 60 | 2 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
236.85 | 48-401-18-1,35 | 1 | 10 | 90 | Maestrichtian | CALCAREOUS CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 58 | 0 | 20 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 |
246.70 | 48-401-19-1,70 | 20 | 50 | 30 | Cretaceous | FORAM CALCAREOUS CHALK | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 57 | 0 | 8 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
247.23 | 48-401-19-11,123 | 1 | 69 | 30 | Cretaceous | CALCAREOUS CHALK | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 70 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 |
247.26 | 48-401-19-11,126 | 1 | 60 | 40 | Cretaceous | MARLY CALCAREOUS CHALK | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 35 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |