Citation:

PANGAEA.230749

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Montadert, Lucien; Roberts, David G; Auffret, Gérard A; Bock, W D; Dupeuble, P A; Hailwood, Ernie A; Harrison, William E; Kagami, H; Lumsden, D N; Müller, C M; Schnitker, Detmar; Thompson, T L; Timofeev, Pyotr P (1979): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. U. S. Government Printing Office, XLVIII, 1183 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.48.1979

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 47.381700 * Longitude: -9.198300

Date/Time Start: 1976-05-25T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1976-05-25T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.07 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 9.23 m

Event(s):

48-400 * Latitude: 47.381700 * Longitude: -9.198300 * Date/Time: 1976-05-25T00:00:00 * Elevation: -4399.0 m * Penetration: 9 m * Recovery: 9.2 m * Location: North Atlantic/BASIN * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 1 cores; 9 m cored; 0 m drilled; 102.6 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Dolomite	Dol	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Chert	Chert	%	Smear slide analysis	fragments
14	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Silicoflagellates	Silicoflag	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Quartz	Qz	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Feldspar	Fsp	%	Smear slide analysis
20	Mica	Mica	%	Smear slide analysis
21	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
22	Glauconite	Glt	%	Smear slide analysis
23	Opaque minerals	Opaque	%	Smear slide analysis
24	Pyrite, FeS2	Py	%	Smear slide analysis
25	Iron	Fe	%	Smear slide analysis
26	Heavy minerals	HM	%	Smear slide analysis
27	Augite	Aug	%	Smear slide analysis
28	Zircon	Zrn	%	Smear slide analysis
29	Garnet	Grt	%	Smear slide analysis
30	Epidote	Ep	%	Smear slide analysis
31	Hornblende	Hbl	%	Smear slide analysis
32	Zoisite	Zo	%	Smear slide analysis
33	Rock fragments	Rock fragm	%	Smear slide analysis
34	Organic matter	OM	%	Smear slide analysis	organic debris
35	Terrigenous	Terr	%	Smear slide analysis	terrigeneous detritus

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

339 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Carb [%]	10 Dol [%]	11 Nannos [%]	12 Foram [%]	13 Chert [%]	14 Rad [%]	15 Diatoms [%]	16 Silicoflag [%]	17 Spiculae [%]	18 Qz [%]	19 Fsp [%]	20 Mica [%]	21 Clay min [%]	22 Glt [%]	23 Opaque [%]	24 Py [%]	25 Fe [%]	26 HM [%]	27 Aug [%]	28 Zrn [%]	29 Grt [%]	30 Ep [%]	31 Hbl [%]	32 Zo [%]	33 Rock fragm [%]	34 OM [%]	35 Terr [%]
0.07	48-400-1-1,7	4	66	30	Quaternary	DIATOMACEOUS NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	0	46	10	0	0	20	1	1	2	0	0	20	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	22
0.46	48-400-1-1,46	3	50	47	Quaternary	ORG MATTER BEARING NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	5	0	50	5	0	0	5	2	1	3	2	2	20	1	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	23
0.77	48-400-1-1,77	5	60	35	Quaternary	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	0	60	10	0	0	2	0	1	3	0	2	20	0	0	0	2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	24
1.25	48-400-1-11,125	1	0	10	Quaternary	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	20	0	65	1	0	0	0	0	1	2	0	0	12	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	14
1.57	48-400-1-2,7	5	40	65	Quaternary	DIAT MARLY CALC OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	24	0	15	2	0	0	25	0	7	2	0	0	25	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	27
3.21	48-400-1-3,21	1	40	60	Quaternary	MARLY CALC OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	50	0	10	0	0	2	2	0	2	10	0	0	30	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	40
4.21	48-400-1-31,121	30	60	10	Quaternary	MARLY NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	20	0	40	0	0	0	0	0	0	29	0	0	10	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	40
5.15	48-400-1-4,65	0	0	0	Quaternary	PYRITE CONCRETION	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	10	1	10	0	0	0	0	0	0	20	3	0	10	0	0	44	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
5.50	48-400-1-41,100	1	40	60	Quaternary	MARLY CALC OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	40	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	20	0	0	38	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	58
9.23	48-400-1-CC,0	0	0	0		MARLY CALC OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	7	0	0	2	1	0	0	0	0	68	4	0	0	1	3	0	4	7	1	1	1	1	1	79	7	0	0