Citation:

PANGAEA.230744

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Wind, Frank H; Whelan, Jean K; Weser, Oscar E; Sarnthein, Michael; Mountain, Gregory S; McCoy, Floyd W; Lutze, Gerhard F; Lopatin, B G; Hamilton, Norman; Garifal, Linda; Cornford, C; Cita, Maria Bianca; Cepek, Pavel; Arthur, Michael A; von Rad, Ulrich; Ryan, William B F (1979): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, XLVII Pt. 1, 835 pp + 787 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.47-1.1979

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 40.960000 * Longitude: -10.718300

Date/Time Start: 1976-04-14T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1976-04-14T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 172.61 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 208.15 m

Event(s):

47-398A * Latitude: 40.960000 * Longitude: -10.718300 * Date/Time: 1976-04-14T00:00:00 * Elevation: -3910.0 m * Penetration: 210.5 m * Recovery: 17.2 m * Location: North Atlantic/SEAMOUNT * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 2 cores; 19 m cored; 0 m drilled; 90.7 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Dolomite	Dol	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Quartz	Qz	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Feldspar	Fsp	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Mica	Mica	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Glauconite	Glt	%	Smear slide analysis
20	Pyrite, FeS2	Py	%	Smear slide analysis
21	Magnetite	Fe3O4	%	Smear slide analysis
22	Heavy minerals	HM	%	Smear slide analysis
23	Apatite	Ap	%	Smear slide analysis
24	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis
25	Organic matter	OM	%	Smear slide analysis	organic debris
26	Fecal pellets	Fecal pel	%	Smear slide analysis
27	Terrigenous	Terr	%	Smear slide analysis	terrigeneous detritus

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

364 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Carb [%]	10 Dol [%]	11 Nannos [%]	12 Foram [%]	13 Diatoms [%]	14 Spiculae [%]	15 Qz [%]	16 Fsp [%]	17 Mica [%]	18 Clay min [%]	19 Glt [%]	20 Py [%]	21 Fe3O4 [%]	22 HM [%]	23 Ap [%]	24 Volc glass [%]	25 OM [%]	26 Fecal pel [%]	27 Terr [%]
172.61	47-398A-1-1,11	0	10	90	Pliocene	MARLY NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	2	2	54	2	0	2	2	0	2	40	0	2	0	2	0	0	0	0	42
172.98	47-398A-1-1,48	5	30	65	Pliocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	0	81	5	0	2	1	0	1	10	2	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	12
176.18	47-398A-1-3,68	3	30	67	Pliocene	MARLY NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	5	0	52	3	2	0	8	1	1	30	2	2	0	2	0	0	0	0	40
176.45	47-398A-1-3,95	5	20	75	Pliocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	0	78	8	0	0	1	0	2	10	2	1	0	2	0	0	2	0	11
176.52	47-398A-1-31,102	2	10	88	Pliocene	NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	1	0	77	1	0	0	1	0	2	20	2	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	21
177.21	47-398A-1-4,21	1	20	79	Pliocene	MARLY NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	3	0	65	3	0	2	5	1	1	0	2	1	0	2	0	0	0	0	28
179.53	47-398A-1-51,103	3	20	77	Pliocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	2	74	8	0	0	1	0	2	15	2	2	0	2	0	0	0	0	16
180.43	47-398A-1-6,43	3	19	78	Pliocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	2	77	5	0	0	1	0	2	15	2	2	0	2	0	0	0	0	16
202.23	47-398A-2-11,123	3	5	92	Pliocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	1	70	3	0	0	2	0	2	24	0	0	0	2	0	1	0	0	26
202.26	47-398A-2-11,126	2	10	88	Pliocene	NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	2	0	65	5	0	0	1	0	1	25	2	2	0	0	1	0	0	1	27
202.27	47-398A-2-11,127	3	7	90	Pliocene	NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	2	0	70	1	0	0	3	0	2	21	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	3	0
203.25	47-398A-2-2,75	8	10	82	Pliocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	1	1	66	10	0	0	1	0	1	20	2	1	0	2	0	0	0	0	22
206.22	47-398A-2-4,72	5	10	85	Pliocene	NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	1	2	70	3	0	0	1	0	2	22	2	2	0	2	0	0	0	2	27
208.15	47-398A-2-51,115	3	10	87	Pliocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	0	70	5	0	0	2	0	1	20	2	2	0	0	2	0	2	0	23