Benson, William E; Sheridan, Robert E (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 44-393 [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.230734
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Related to:
Benson, William E; Enos, Paul; Freeman, Tom; Gradstein, Felix M; Murdmaa, Ivar O; Pastouret, L; Schmidt, Ronald R; Sheridan, Robert E; Stuermer, D H; Weaver, Fred M; Worstell, Paula J (1978): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. U. S. Government Printing Office, XLIV, 1005 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.44.1978
Further details:
Project(s):
Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)
Coverage:
Latitude: 28.196700 * Longitude: -75.599000
Date/Time Start: 1975-11-11T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1975-11-11T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 1.34 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 9.10 m
Event(s):
44-393 * Latitude: 28.196700 * Longitude: -75.599000 * Date/Time: 1975-11-11T00:00:00 * Elevation: -4951.0 m * Penetration: 8 m * Recovery: 4.4 m * Location: North Atlantic/BASIN * Campaign: Leg44 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 1 cores; 8 m cored; 0 m drilled; 55 % recovery
Parameter(s):
# | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DEPTH, sediment/rock | Depth sed | m | Geocode | ||
2 | Sample code/label | Sample label | DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation | |||
3 | Sand | Sand | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
4 | Silt | Silt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
5 | Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay | <2 µm | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
6 | Stratigraphy | Stratigraphy | Smear slide analysis | |||
7 | Lithology/composition/facies | Lithology | Smear slide analysis | |||
8 | Comment | Comment | Smear slide analysis | |||
9 | Carbonates | Carb | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
10 | Nannofossils | Nannos | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
11 | Foraminifera | Foram | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
12 | Radiolarians | Rad | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
13 | Diatoms | Diatoms | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
14 | Spiculae | Spiculae | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
15 | Quartz | Qz | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
16 | Feldspar | Fsp | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
17 | Mica | Mica | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
18 | Clay minerals | Clay min | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
19 | Glauconite | Glt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
20 | Iron | Fe | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
21 | Heavy minerals | HM | % | Smear slide analysis |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
119 data points
Data
1 Depth sed [m] | 2 Sample label | 3 Sand [%] | 4 Silt [%] | 5 <2 µm [%] | 6 Stratigraphy | 7 Lithology | 8 Comment | 9 Carb [%] | 10 Nannos [%] | 11 Foram [%] | 12 Rad [%] | 13 Diatoms [%] | 14 Spiculae [%] | 15 Qz [%] | 16 Fsp [%] | 17 Mica [%] | 18 Clay min [%] | 19 Glt [%] | 20 Fe [%] | 21 HM [%] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.34 | 44-393-1-11,134 | 2 | 25 | 73 | Quaternary | SILTY CALCAREOUS CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 15 | 20 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
2.60 | 44-393-1-21,110 | 0 | 10 | 90 | Quaternary | SILTY CLACAREOUS CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 15 | 25 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
3.50 | 44-393-1-3,50 | 0 | 20 | 80 | Quaternary | SILTY CALCAREOUS CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 10 | 20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
4.25 | 44-393-1-31,125 | 0 | 50 | 50 | Quaternary | MARLY NANNO OOZE | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 30 | 30 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
5.07 | 44-393-1-4,57 | 0 | 20 | 80 | Quaternary | MARLY NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 10 | 20 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
9.10 | 44-393-1-CC,0 | 1 | 30 | 70 | CALCAREOUS SILTY CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 15 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 60 | 1 | 0 | 1 |